Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of flood hazard mapping in urban areas using entropy weighting method: a case study in Hamadan city, Iran

  • Research Article - Hydrology
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flood is one of the major natural disasters which cause enormous casualties and damages particularly in urban areas. In urban areas, studies on flood hazards have been accompanied by tensions for various reasons, including complexity of urban levels, different spatial modeling indices, lack of accurate hydrological data, and precise modeling of land surface simulations. This paper used a Constrained Delaunay Triangular Irregular Network to model fine urban surfaces (based on the detailed ground sampling data), and subsequently discusses five indicators regarding the dangers of flood, namely (1) elevation, (2) slope, (3) distance to discharge channels, (4) index of development and persistence of the drainage network (IDPR), and (5) infiltration rate. In the next step for flood hazard mapping, the combination of geographical information systems and the entropy weight method as the multi-criteria decision analysis was used to combine the indicators. The proposed methodology was used for Hamadan city that is located in the central part of Hamadan Province in Iran where several floods occur annually. The flood hazard mapping indicates that approximately 15.83% of the total study area is classified as very highly hazardous, 31.72% as hazardous, 20.11% as moderate, 16.02% as minor, and 16.32% as the least hazardous. Finally, superimposition and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methods were used to verify the accuracy of the obtained flood hazard map. In terms of superimposition and ROC curve, the accuracy of the model was approximately 70% and 73%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bathrellos G, Karymbalis E, Skilodimou H, Gaki-Papanastassiou K, Baltas E (2016) Urban flood hazard assessment in the basin of Athens Metropolitan city. Greece Environ Earth Sci 75:319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD, Chousianitis K, Youssef AM, Pradhan B (2017) Suitability estimation for urban development using multi-hazard assessment map. Sci Total Environ 575:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covino T (2017) Hydrologic connectivity as a framework for understanding biogeochemical flux through watersheds and along fluvial networks. Geomorphology 277:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox LA (2009) Limitations of risk assessment using risk matrices. In: Cox LA (ed) Risk analysis of complex and uncertain systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Degiorgis M, Gnecco G, Gorni S, Roth G, Sanguineti M, Taramasso AC (2012) Classifiers for the detection of flood-prone areas using remote sensed elevation data. J Hydrol 470:302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dysarz T, Wicher-Dysarz J, Sojka M, Jaskuła J (2019) Analysis of extreme flow uncertainty impact on size of flood hazard zones for the Wronki gauge station in the Warta river. Acta Geophysica 67:661–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkhrachy I (2015) Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite images and GIS tools: a case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 18:261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández D, Lutz M (2010) Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol 111:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay A, Cerdan O, Mardhel V, Desmet M (2016) Application of an index of sediment connectivity in a lowland area. J Soils Sedim 16:280–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiglieri G, Carletti A, Pittalis D (2014) Runoff coefficient and average yearly natural aquifer recharge assessment by physiography-based indirect methods for the island of Sardinia (Italy) and its NW area (Nurra). J Hydrol 519:1779–1791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigović L, Pamučar D, Bajić Z, Drobnjak S (2017) Application of GIS-interval rough AHP methodology for flood hazard mapping in urban areas. Water 9:360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo E, Zhang J, Ren X, Zhang Q, Sun Z (2014) Integrated risk assessment of flood disaster based on improved set pair analysis and the variable fuzzy set theory in central Liaoning Province, China. Nat Hazards 74:947–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall M, Ellis J (1985) Water quality problems of urban areas. GeoJournal 11:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann T, et al (2015) Indices of hydrological and sediment connectivity-state of the art and way forward. In: EGU general assembly conference abstracts

  • Hernandes TAD, Scarpare FV, Seabra JEA (2018) Assessment of the recent land use change dynamics related to sugarcane expansion and the associated effects on water resources availability. J Clean Prod 197:1328–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S-L, Yeh C-T, Budd WW, Chen L-L (2009) A sensitivity model (SM) approach to analyze urban development in Taiwan based on sustainability indicators. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi T, Maruyama T, Singh VP (2001) Rainfall entropy for delineation of water resources zones in Japan. J Hydrol 246:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T (2015) Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: application in Rhodope-Evros region, Greece. Sci Total Environ 538:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalzig J (2008) Climate, Poverty, and Justice: What the Poznan UN climate conference needs to deliver for a fair and effective global deal. Oxfam Policy Pract Clim Change Resil 4:117–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Lee S, Lee M-J, Jung H-S (2018) Spatial assessment of urban flood susceptibility using data mining and geographic information system (GIS) tools. Sustainability 10:648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q (2013) Fuzzy approach to analysis of flood risk based on variable fuzzy sets and improved information diffusion methods. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13(2):239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Wu L, Zhu W, Hou M, Yang Y, Zheng J (2014) A new method for urban storm flood inundation simulation with fine CD-TIN surface. Water 6:1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Zhou J, An X, Zhang Y, Yang L (2010) Using fuzzy theory and information entropy for water quality assessment in Three Gorges region, China. Expert Syst Appl 37:2517–2521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohani AK, Goel N, Bhatia K (2014) Improving real time flood forecasting using fuzzy inference system. J Hydrol 509:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi FH, Fallahnejad R (2010) Imprecise Shannon’s entropy and multi attribute decision making. Entropy 12:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu H-M, Shen S-L, Zhou A, Yang J (2019) Perspectives for flood risk assessment and management for mega-city metro system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 84:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiwal D, Jha MK, Mal BC (2011) Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of India using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques. Water Resour Manag 25:1359–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud SH, Gan TY (2018) Multi-criteria approach to develop flood susceptibility maps in arid regions of Middle East. J Clean Prod 196:216–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor ÁG, Bautista S, Small EE, Dixon M, Bellot J (2008) Measurement of the connectivity of runoff source areas as determined by vegetation pattern and topography: a tool for assessing potential water and soil losses in drylands. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006367

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Özger M, Singh VP (2009) An entropy-based investigation into the variability of precipitation. J Hydrol 370:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra S, Mishra P, Mahapatra SC (2018) Delineation of groundwater potential zone for sustainable development: A case study from Ganga Alluvial Plain covering Hooghly district of India using remote sensing, geographic information system and analytic hierarchy process. J Clean Prod 172:2485–2502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2009) Flood Susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J Spatial Hydrol 9:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Radwan F, Alazba A, Mossad A (2019) Flood risk assessment and mapping using AHP in arid and semiarid regions. Acta Geophysica 67:215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez LR, Nouvel R, Duminil E, Eicker U (2017) Setting intelligent city tiling strategies for urban shading simulations. Sol Energy 157:880–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samanta S, Koloa C, Kumar Pal D, Palsamanta B (2016) Flood risk analysis in lower part of Markham river based on multi-criteria decision approach (MCDA). Hydrology 3:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanze J (2006) Flood risk management–a basic framework. In: Schanze J (ed) Flood risk management: hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sepehri M, Malekinezhad H, Ilderomi AR, Talebi A, Hosseini SZ (2018) Studying the effect of rain water harvesting from roof surfaces on runoff and household consumption reduction. Sustain Cities Soc 43:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepehri M, Malekinezhad H, Hosseini SZ, Ildoromi AR (2019) Suburban flood hazard mapping in Hamadan city, Iran. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-municipal engineer. Thomas Telford Ltd, pp 1–13

  • Shadman Roodposhti M, Aryal J, Shahabi H, Safarrad T (2016) Fuzzy shannon entropy: a hybrid GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping method. Entropy 18:343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V (1997) The use of entropy in hydrology and water resources. Hydrol Process 11:587–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalan M (2003) Prediction in ungauged basins: a grand challenge for theoretical hydrology. Hydrol Process 17:3163–3170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skilodimou HD, Bathrellos GD, Chousianitis K, Youssef AM, Pradhan B (2019) Multi-hazard assessment modeling via multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study. Environ Earth Sci 78:47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson M (1989) Cognitive science Ignorance and uncertainty: emerging paradigms. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3628-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanidis S, Stathis D (2013) Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Nat Hazards 68:569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Jiao L, Shuai C, Shen L (2018) A system dynamics model for simulating urban sustainability performance: a China case study. J Clean Prod 199:1107–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2013) Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol 504:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa R, Gupta S, Reddy D (2017) Application of geospatial modelling technique in delineation of fluoride contamination zones within Dwarka Basin, Birbhum, India. Geosci Front 8:1105–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal I (2017) Defining an optimal cut-point value in roc analysis: an alternative approach. Comput Math Methods Med 2017:3762651. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3762651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Tech Release 55:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Uwasu M, Yabar H (2011) Assessment of sustainable development based on the capital approach. Ecol Indic 11:348–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Lai C, Chen X, Yang B, Zhao S, Bai X (2015) Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. J Hydrol 527:1130–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Zhang DQ, Su J, Dong JW, Tan SK (2018) Assessing hydrological effects and performance of low impact development practices based on future scenarios modeling. J Clean Prod 179:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Ma C, Lian J, Xu K, Chaima E (2018) Urban flooding risk assessment based on an integrated k-means cluster algorithm and improved entropy weight method in the region of Haikou, China. J Hydrol 563:975–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X-l, Ding J-h, Hou H (2013) Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis. Nat Hazards 68:657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Q, Zhou J, Zhou C, Song L, Guo J (2013) Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:525–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Malekinezhad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sepehri, M., Malekinezhad, H., Hosseini, S.Z. et al. Assessment of flood hazard mapping in urban areas using entropy weighting method: a case study in Hamadan city, Iran. Acta Geophys. 67, 1435–1449 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00342-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00342-x

Keywords

Navigation