Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of Prognostic Genes for Colon Cancer through Gene Co-expression Network Analysis

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The present study was aimed to identify novel key genes, prognostic biomarkers and molecular pathways implicated in tumorigenesis of colon cancer.

Methods

The microarray data GSE41328 containing 10 colon cancer samples and 10 adjacent normal tissues was analyzed to identify 4763 differentially expressed genes. Meanwhile, another microarray data GSE17536 was performed for weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA).

Results

In present study, 12 co-expressed gene modules associated with tumor progression were identified for further studies. The red module showed the highest association with pathological stage by Pearson’s correlation analysis. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that genes in red module focused on cell division, cell proliferation, cell cycle and metabolic related pathway. Then, a total of 26 key hub genes were identified, and GEPIA database was subsequently selected for validation. Holliday junction-recognizing protein (HJURP) and cell division cycle 25 homolog C (CDC25C) were identified as effective prognosis biomarkers, which were all detrimental to prognosis. Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) found the two hub genes were enriched in “oocyte meiosis”, “oocyte maturation that are progesterone-mediated”, “p53 signaling pathway”, and “cell cycle”. Furthermore, the immunohistochemistry and western blotting showed that HJURP was highly expressed in colon cancer tissue.

Conclusion

HJURP was identified as a key gene associated with colon cancer progression and prognosis by WGCNA, which might influence the prognosis by regulating cell cycle pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018,68(6):394–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chin AI, Lam JS, Figlin RA, et al. Surveillance strategies for renal cell carcinoma patients following nephrectomy. Rev Urol, 2006,8(1):1–7

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Frouws MA, Reimers MS, Swets M, et al. The Influence of BRAF and KRAS Mutation Status on the Association between Aspirin Use and Survival after Colon Cancer Diagnosis. PLoS One, 2017,12(1):e0170775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu L, Wang G, Zhang Q, et al. Karyopherin alpha 2 expression is a novel diagnostic and prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett, 2017,13(3):1194–1200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Langfelder P, Horvath S. An r package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008,9,559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Waligórska-Stachura J, Jankowska A, Waśko R, et al. Survivin—prognostic tumor biomarker in human neoplasms—review. Ginekol Pol, 2012, 83(7):537–540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sant GR, Kempuraj D, Marchand JE, et al. The mast cell in interstitial cystitis: role in pathophysiology and pathogenesis. Urology, 2007,69(4 Suppl):34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, et al. Affy—analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics, 2004, 20(3):307–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015,43(7):e47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yip AM, Horvath S. Gene network interconnectedness and the generalized topological overlap measure. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007,8:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, et al. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science, 2002, 297(5586):1551–1555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol, 2003,4(5):P3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foroughi K, Amini M, Atashi A, et al. Tissue-Specific Down-Regulation of the Long Non-Coding RNAs PCAT18 and LINC01133 in Gastric Cancer Development. Int J Mol Sci, 2018,19(12):3881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen J, Wang X, Hu B, et al. Candidate genes in gastric cancer identified by constructing a weighted gene co-expression network. PeerJ, 2018,6:e4692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnhart-Dailey MC, Trivedi P, Stukenberg PT, et al. HJURP interaction with the condensin II complex during G1 promotes CENP-A deposition. Mol Biol Cell, 2017,28(1):54–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunleavy EM, Roche D, Tagami H, et al. HJURP is a cell-cycle-dependent maintenance and deposition factor of CENP-A at centromeres. Cell, 2009,137(3):485–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perpelescu M, Hori T, Toyoda A, et al. HJURP is involved in the expansion of centromeric chromatin. Mol Biol Cell, 2015,26(15):2742–2754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tachiwana H, Müller S, Blümer J, et al. HJURP involvement in de novo CenH3(CENP-A) and CENP-C recruitment. Cell Rep, 2015,11(1):22–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen YF, Liang YX, Yang JA, et al. Upregulation of Holliday junction recognition protein predicts poor prognosis and biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer. Oncol Lett, 2019,18(6):6697–6703

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu Z, Huang G, Sadanandam A, et al. The expression level of HJURP has an independent prognostic impact and predicts the sensitivity to radiotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res, 2010,12(2):R18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cao R, Wang G, Qian K, et al. Silencing of HJURP induces dysregulation of cell cycle and ROS metabolism in bladder cancer cells via PPARy-SIRT1 feedback loop. J Cancer, 2017,8(12):2282–2295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei Y, Ouyang GL, Yao WX, et al. Knockdown of HJURP inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by repressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2019,23(9):3847–3856

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li L, Li X, Meng Q, et al. Increased Expression of Holliday Junction-Recognizing Protein (HJURP) as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced-Stage Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24:3050–3055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen T, Huang H, Zhou Y, et al. HJURP promotes hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation by destabilizing p21 via the MAPK/ERK1/2 and AKT/GSK3β signaling pathways. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2018,37(1):193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen T, Zhou L, Zhou Y, et al. HJURP Promotes Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition via Upregulating SPHK1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Biol Sci, 2019,15(6):1139–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wei Y, Ouyang GL, Yao WX, et al. Knockdown of HJURP inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by repressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2019,23(9):3847–3856

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morikawa T, Hino R, Uozaki H, et al. Expression of ribonucleotide reductase M2 subunit in gastric cancer and effects of RRM2 inhibition in vitro. Hum Pathol, 2010,41(12):1742–1748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lei Y, Geng Z, Guo-Jun W, et al. Prognostic significance of survivin expression in renal cell cancer and its correlation with radioresistance. Mol Cell Biochem 2010,344(1–2):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahotka C, Krieg T, Krieg A, et al. Distinct in vivo expression patterns of survivin splice variants in renal cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer, 2002,100(1):30–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xie Y, Ma X, Gu L, et al. Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of Survivin Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci Rep, 2016,6:29794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu XL, Yang ZW, He L, et al. RRS1 silencing suppresses colorectal cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis by inhibiting G2/M progression and angiogenesis. Oncotarget, 2017,8(47):82968–82980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fabbro M, Zhou BB, Takahashi M, et al. Cdk1/Erk2-and Plk1-dependent phosphorylation of a centrosome protein, Cep55, is required for its recruitment to midbody and cytokinesis. Dev Cell, 2005,9(4):477–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh PK, Srivastava AK, Rath SK, et al. Expression and clinical significance of Centrosomal protein 55 (CEP55) in human urinary bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Immunobiology, 2015,220(1):103–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Naderi A, Teschendorff AE, Barbosa-Morais NL, et al. A gene-expression signature to predict survival in breast cancer across independent data sets. Oncogene, 2007, 26(10):1507–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang C, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. High CEP55 expression is associated with poor prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther, 2018, 11:4979–4990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tan Y, Wang Q, Xie Y, et al. Identification of FOXM1 as a specific marker for triple negative breast cancer. Int J Oncol, 2019,54(1):87–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Breyer J, Wirtz RM, Erben P, et al. FOXM1 overexpression is associated with adverse outcome and predicts response to intravesical instillation therapy in stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int, 2019,123(1):187–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mao-hui Feng or Fei Su.

Additional information

This project was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81072152 and No. 81770283), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2015CFA027), Research Foundation of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hubei Province (No. WJ2015MA010 and No. WJ2017M249), Clinical Medical Research Center of Peritoneal Cancer of Wuhan (No. 2015060911020462) and Subsidy Project of No. 1 Hospital of Lanzhou University (No. ldyyyn2018-13) and Innovation fund of universities in Gansu Province (No. 2020B-009).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Dw., Yang, Zs., Xu, J. et al. Identification of Prognostic Genes for Colon Cancer through Gene Co-expression Network Analysis. CURR MED SCI 41, 1012–1022 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-021-2386-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-021-2386-2

Key words

Navigation