Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Surgery Classification for Endoscopic Approaches to Middle Ear Cholesteatoma

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study aimed to develop a novel surgery classification for an endoscopic approach to middle ear cholesteatoma. We retrospectively analyzed the surgical approaches and outcomes of patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. Middle ear cholesteatoma surgeries were divided into four types and two special types as follows: type I, attic retraction pocket, which only requires tympanostomy tube placement or retraction pocket resection and cartilage reconstruction; type II, cholesteatoma which is limited to the attic or in which endoscopy can confirm complete removal of mastoid cholesteatoma lesions, including type II a, requiring only use of a curette, and type II b, requiring use of an electric drill or chisel; type III, cholesteatoma not limited to the attic, in which endoscopy cannot confirm complete removal of mastoid cholesteatoma lesions, requiring the combined use of endoscope and microscope to perform endoscopic tympanoplasty and “Canal Wall Up” mastoidectomy; type IV, extensive involvement of mastoid cavity cholesteatoma lesions and/or cases with a potential risk of complications, removal of which can only be performed under a microscope for “Canal Wall Down” mastoidectomy. In addition, there were two special types: “difficult external auditory canal” and congenital cholesteatoma in children. In our system, type I and type II middle ear cholesteatoma surgery was completely performed under an endoscope alone. However, estimating the extent of the lesions, determining the choice of mastoid opening and reestablishing ventilation are the key points for an endoscopic approach to middle ear cholesteatoma. The classification of endoscopic middle ear cholesteatoma surgery may benefit the selection of surgical indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anikin IA, Bokuchava TA. The peculiar clinical features of different types of acquired cholesteatoma of the middle ear. Vestn Otorinolaringol, 2018,83(3):11–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hou ZH, Li RX, Yang SM. Application of Endoscopic Techniques in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma Surgeries. Chin J Otol (Chinese), 2017,15(4):393–397

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuo CW, Wu HM. Fully endoscopic laser stapedotomy: is it comparable with microscopic surgery? Acta Otolaryngol, 2018,138(10):871–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kong WJ. Endoscopic ear surgery: flash in the pan or transformative innovation? J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chinese), 2018,32(6):427–434

    Google Scholar 

  5. Presutti L, Gioacchini FM, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, et al. Results of endoscopic middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma treatment: a systematic review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2014,34(3):153–157

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen MS, Basonbul RA, Kozin ED, et al. Residual Cholesteatoma during Second-Look Procedures following Primary Pediatric Endoscopic Ear Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017,157(6):1034–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yung M, Tono T, Olszewska E, et al. EAONO/JOS Joint Consensus Statements on the Definitions, Classification and Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. J Int Adv Otol, 2017,13(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe T, Ito T, Furukawa T, et al. The Efficacy of Color-Mapped Diffusion-Weighted Images Combined With CT in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cholesteatoma Using Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery. Otol Neurotol, 2015,36(10):1663–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Master AN, Flores JM, Gardner LG, et al. Anatomical Factors Influencing Selective Vestibular Neurectomy: A Comparison of Posterior Fossa Approaches. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base, 2016,77(1):19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cui Y. Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery. Xi’an: World Book Publishing Xi’an Co., Ltd., 2019:9

    Google Scholar 

  11. Louw L. Acquired cholesteatoma pathogenesis: stepwise explanations. J Laryngol Otol, 2010,124(6):587–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diacova S, McDonald TJ. A comparison of outcomes following tympanostomy tube placement or conservative measures for management of otitis media with effusion. Ear Nose Throat J, 2007,86(9):552–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalcioglu MT, Cokkeser Y, Kizilay A, et al. Follow-up of 366 ears after tympanostomy tube insertion: why is it draining? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2003,128(4):560–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaya I, Turhal G, Ozturk A. Results of endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty procedure with limited tympanomeatal flap incision. Acta Otolaryngol, 2017,137(11):1174–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schröder S, Reineke U, Lehmann M, et al. Chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction in adults: long-term results of baloon eustachian tuboplasty. HNO, 2013,61(2):142–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marchioni D, Villari D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, et al. Endoscopic open technique in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011,268(11):1557–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palva T, Northrop C, Ramsay H. Aeration and drainage pathways of Prussak’s space. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2001,57(1):55–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marchioni D, Mattioli F, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, et al. Trans canal endoscopic approach to the sinus tympani: a clinical report. Otol Neurotol, 2009,30:758–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bista M, Mahato NB, Regmi D. Innovative Method of Using Endoscope in Postoperative Canal Wall Down Mastoid Cavity. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, 2018,56(211):650–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Azevedo AF, Soares AB, Garchet HQ, et al. Tympanomastoidectomy: Comparison between canal wall-down and canal wall-up techniques in surgery for chronic otitis media. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013,17(3):242–245

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Quan Y, Liu J, Liu Z, et al. Detection of hypoplasia of bony cochlear nerve canal by the opening threshold of virtual endoscopy: a pilot study. Acta Radiol, 2014,55(3):318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahdoufi R, Tazi N, Barhmi I, et al. Bilateral primitive cholesteatoma of external auditory canal with congenital stenosis. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2016,24:108–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin D, Li C, Juan H, et al. Morphological Characteristics of Osseous External Auditory Canal and Its Relationship With External Auditory Canal Cholesteatoma in Patients With Congenital Aural Stenosis. Otol Neurotol, 2017,38(10):1528–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ito T, Kubota T, Watanabe T, et al. Transcanal endoscopic ear surgery for pediatric population with a narrow external auditory canal. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2015,79(12):2265–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Palva T, Northrop C, Ramsay H. Aeration and drainage pathways of Prussak’s space. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2001,57(1):55–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kerckhoffs KG, Kommer MB, van Strien TH, et al. The disease recurrence rate after the canal wall up or canal wall down technique in adults. Laryngoscope, 2016,126(4):980–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, et al. The investigation of the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Otol Neurotol, 2008,29(6):803–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Crowson MG, Ramprasad VH, Chapurin N, et al. Cost analysis and outcomes of a second-Look tympanoplasty-mastoidectomy strategy for cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope, 2016,126(11):2574–2579

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yu Sun, Hong-jun Xiao or Wei-jia Kong.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2019kfyXKJC039).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Wang, Eh., Yu, Jt. et al. A Novel Surgery Classification for Endoscopic Approaches to Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. CURR MED SCI 40, 9–17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-020-2141-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-020-2141-0

Key words

Navigation