Skip to main content
Log in

Independent relationship between body mass index and LH peak value of GnRH stimulation test in ICPP girls: A cross-sectional study

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of obesity on idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP) girls is still under discussion. The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and sexual hormone levels of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test in ICPP girls is controversial and the underlying mechanism is unclear. This study aims to further explore the independent effect of excess adiposity on peak luteinizing hormone (LH) level of stimulation test in ICPP girls and the role of other related factors. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on 618 girls diagnosed as having ICPP, including 355 cases of normal weight, 99 cases of overweight and 164 cases of obese. The results showed that obese group had more progressed Tanner stage and no significant difference (P=0.28) in LH peak was found as basal LH value was used as a covariate. The obese group had higher total testosterone (TT), adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), 17-α hydroxyprogesterone (17-αOHP) and androstendione (AN), with significantly increased fasting insulin (FIN) and homeostasis model of assessment for insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR). Stratified analysis showed inconsistency of the relationship between BMI-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS) and LH peak in different Tanner stages (P for interaction=0.017). Further smoothing plot showed linear and non-linear relationship between BMI-SDS and LH peak in three Tanner stages. Then linear regression model was used to analyze the relationship between BMI-SDS and LH peak in different Tanner stages, with and without different confounding factors being adjusted. In B2 stage, BMI-SDS was negatively associated with LH peak. In B3 stage, when BMI-SDS <1.5, as BMI-SDS increased, the level of LH peak decreased (model I: β=–1.8, 95% CI=–4.7 to 1.1, P=0.214). When BMI-SDS ≥1.5, BMI-SDS was significantly positively associated with LH peak (model I: β=4.5, 95% CI=1.7 to 7.4, P=0.002). In B4 stage, when BMI-SDS <1.5, BMI-SDS was negatively associated with LH peak (model I: β=–11.6, 95% CI=–22.7 to–0.5, P=0.049). When BMI-SDS ≥1.5, BMI-SDS was positively associated with LH peak (model I: β=–4.2, 95% CI=–3.3 to 11.7, P=0.28). It is concluded that there is an independent correlation between BMI-SDS and LH peak of stimulation test in ICPP girls, their relationships are different in different Tanner stages, and the effect of BMI-SDS can be affected by adrenal androgens, estradiol and glucose metabolism parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burt Solorzano CM, McCartney CR. Obesity and the pubertal transition in girls and boys. Reproduction, 2010,140(3):399–410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Latronico AC, Brito VN, Carel JC. Causes, diagnosis, and treatment of central precocious puberty. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2016,4(3):265–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carel JC, Léger J. Precocious Puberty. N Engl J Med, 2008,358(22):2366–2377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brito VN, Latronico AC, Arnhold IJP, et al. Update on the etiology, diagnosis and therapeutic management of sexual precocity. Arq Bras Endrocrinol Metab, 2008,52(1):18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Neely EK, Hintz RL, Wilson DM, et al. Normal ranges for immunochemiluminometric gonadotropin assays. J Pediatr, 1995,127(1):40–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brito VN, Batista MC, Borges MF, et al. Diagnostic value of fluorometric assays in the evaluation of precocious puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1999,84(10):3539–3544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplowitz PB. Link between body fat and the timing of puberty. Pediatrics, 2008,121(3):S208–S217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knudsen KL, Blank SK, Burt SC, et al. Hyperandrogenemia in obese peripubertal girls: correlates and potential etiological determinants. Obesity, 2010,18(11):2118–2124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bordini B, Littlejohn E, Rosenfield RL. Blunted sleep-related luteinizing hormone rise in healthy premenarcheal pubertal girls with elevated body mass index. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009,94(4):1168–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. McCartney CR, Prendergast KA, Blank SK, et al. Maturation of luteinizing hormone (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) secretion across puberty: evidence for altered regulation in obese peripubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009,94(1):56–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Lerner-Geva L, Copperman NM, et al. Lipid and insulin levels in obese children: changes with age and puberty. Obesity, 2007,15(11):2825–2831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCartney CR, Prendergast KA, Chhabra S, et al. The association of obesity and hyperandrogenemia during the pubertal transition in girls: obesity as a potential factor in the genesis of postpubertal hyperandrogenism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2006,91(5):1714–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCartney CR, Blank SK, Prendergast KA, et al. Obesity and sex steroid dhanges across puberty: evidence for marked hyperandrogenemia in pre-and early pubertal Obese Girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007,92(2):430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fu JF, Liang JF, Zhou XL, et al. Impact of BMI on gonadorelin-stimulated LH peak in premenarcheal girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty. Obesity, 2015,23(3):637–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giabicani E, Allali S, Durand A, et al. Presentation of 493 consecutive girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty: a single-center study. PLoS One, 2013,8(7):e70931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li H Ji CY, Zong XN, et al. Body mass index growth curves for Chinese children and adolescents aged 0 to 18 years. Zhong Hua Er Ke Za Zhi (Chinese), 2009,47(7):493–498

    Google Scholar 

  17. Consensus statement for the diagnosis and treatment of central precocious puberty (2015). Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi (Chinese), 2015,53(6):412–418

  18. Tanner JM, Marshall WA. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child, 1969,44:291–303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiologic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford University Press: Stanford, California,1959:91(1).

  20. Brown RJ, Yanovski JA. Estimation of insulin sensitivity in children: methods, measures and controversies. Pediatr Diabetes, 2014,15(3):151–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Xi B, Zhao X, Shen Y, et al. An obesity genetic risk score predicts risk of insulin resistance among Chinese children. Endocrine, 2014,47(3):825–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bucholtz DC, Chiesa A, Pappano WN, et al. Regulation of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion by insulin in the diabetic male lamb. Biol Reprod, 2000,62(5):1248–1255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams NI, Lancas MJ, Cameron JL. Stimulation of luteinizing hormone secretion by food intake: evidence against a role for insulin. Endocrinology, 1996,137(6):2565–2571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hileman SM, Schillo KK, Hall JB. Effects of acute, intracerebroventricular administration of insulin on serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone, insulin, and glucose in ovariectomized lambs during restricted and ad libitum feed intake. Biol Reprod, 1993,48(1):117–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dong Q, Lazarus RM, Wong LS, et al. Pulsatile LH secretion in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in the rat. J Endocrinol, 1991,131(1):49–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sliwowska JH, Fergani C, Gawalek M, et al. Insulin: its role in the central control of reproduction. Physiol Behav, 2014,133:197–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Blank SK, McCartney CR, Chhabra S, et al. Modulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator sensitivity to progesterone inhibition in hyperandrogenic adolescent girls-implications for regulation of pubertal maturation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009,94(7):2360–2366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. McGee WK, Bishop CV, Bahar A, et al. Elevated androgens during puberty in female rhesus monkeys lead to increased neuronal drive to the reproductive axis: a possible component of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod, 2012,27(2):531–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Collins JS, Beller JP, Burt Solorzano C, et al. Blunted day-night changes in luteinizing hormone pulse frequency in girls with obesity: the potential role of hyperandrogenemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014,99(8):2887–2896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pielecka J, Quaynor SD, Moenter SM. Androgens increase gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuron firing activity in females and interfere with progesterone negative feedback. Endocrinology, 2006,147(3):1474–1479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Couse JF, Korach KS. Estrogen receptor null mice: what have we learned and where will they lead us? Endocr Rev, 1999,20(3):358–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gill S, Sharpless JL, Rado K, et al. Evidence that GnRH decreases with gonadal steroid feedback but increases with age in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002,87(5):2290–2296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Welt CK, Pagan YL, Smith PC, et al. Control of follicle-stimulating hormone by estradiol and the inhibins: critical role of estradiol at the hypothalamus during the luteal-follicular transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003,88(4):1766–1771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shaw ND, Histed SN, Srouji SS, et al. Estrogen negative feedback on gonadotropin secretion: evidence for a direct pituitary effect in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010,95(4):1955–1961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee HS, Yoon JS, Hwang JS. Luteinizing hormone secretion during gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulation tests in obese girls with central precocious puberty. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol, 2016,8(4):392–398

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-ping Luo  (罗小平).

Additional information

This study was supported by grants from 12th five-year Plan National Key Technology R&D Program (No. 2012BAI09B04) and Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. PCSIRT1131).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Hou, L., Gao, Hj. et al. Independent relationship between body mass index and LH peak value of GnRH stimulation test in ICPP girls: A cross-sectional study. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 37, 556–562 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1772-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1772-2

Key words

Navigation