Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanical comparison of gourd-shaped LCP versus LCP for fixation of comminuted tibial shaft fracture

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare monotonic biomechanical properties of gourd-shaped LCP fixation with LCP fixation of human tibial shaft in gap fracture mode. Twenty paired fresh cadaveric human tibias were randomly divided into 4 groups (5 pairs each): (1) axial loading single cycle to failure testing, (2) torsion single cycle to failure testing, (3) 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing, and (4) dynamic 4-point bending testing. A 7-hole 4.5 mm gourd-shaped LCP was secured on the anteromedial surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair, respectively, using 6 locking screws in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th and 7th hole with the middle hole unfilled and just located at the mid-diaphysis of the tibia. A 7-hole 4.5 mm LCP was secured on the other bone with the same method. Standard AO/ASIF techniques were used. After fixation finished, a 10 mm gap in the mid-diaphysis of tibia was created, centrally located at the unfilled hole. The axial, torsional, and bending stiffness and failure strengths were calculated from the collected data in static testings and statistically compared using paired Student’s t-test. The 4-point bending fatigue lives of the two constructs were calculated from the dynamic testing data and also statistically compared using paired Student’s t-test. Failure modes were recorded and visually analyzed. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results showed that the axial, torsional and bending stiffness of gourd-shaped LCP construct was greater (4%, 19%, 12%, respectively, P<0.05) than that of the LCP construct, and the axial, torsional and bending failure strengths of gourd-shaped LCP construct were stronger (10%, 46%, 29%, respectively, P<0.05) than those of the LCP construct. Both constructs failed as a result of plate plastic torsional deformation. After axial loading and 4-point bending testings, LCP failed in term of an obvious deformation of bent apex just at the unfilled plate hole, while the gourd-shaped LCP failed in term of a deformation of bent arc between the 3rd and 5th holes, which indicated a more consistent stress distribution on gourd-shaped LCP. Fatigue life of gourd-shaped LCP construct was significantly greater than LCP construct (153 836±2 228 vs. 132 471±6 460 cycles, P<0.01). All constructs failed as a result of fracture of the plate through the compression hole of the unfilled combination screw hole. The biomechanical testing showed that gourd-shaped LCP can provide greater stiffness and strength, and longer fatigue life than LCP. The gourd-shaped LCP may be more advantageous mechanically and may reduce the plate breakage rate clinically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frigg R. Locking compression plate (LCP). An osteosynthesis plate based on the dynamic compression plate and the point contact fixator (PC-Fix). Injury, 2001,32(Suppl 2):63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wagner M, Frigg R. Locking compression plate (LCP): Ein neuer AO-Standard. OP J, 2000,16(3):238–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Florin M, Arzdorf M, Linke B, et al. Assessment of stiffness and strength of 4 different implants available for equine fracture treatment: a study on a 20 degrees oblique long bone fracture model using a bone substitute. Vet Surg, 2005,34(3): 231–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sommer C, Gautier E, Müller M, et al. First clinical results of the locking compression plate (LCP). Injury, 2003,34(Suppl 2):43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sommer C, Babst R, Müller M, et al. Locking compression plate loosening and plate breakage: a report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma, 2004,18(8):571–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Green E, Lubahn JD, Evans J. Risk factors, treatment, and outcomes associated with nonunion of the midshaft humerus fracture. J Surg Orthop Adv, 2005,14(2):64–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gandhi A, Liporace F, Azad V, et al. Diabetic fracture healing. Foot Ankle Clin, 2006,11(4):805–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunner H, Simpson JP. Fatigue fracture of bone plates. Injury, 1980,11(3):203–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vallier HA, Hennessey TA, Sontich JK, et al. Failure of LCP condylar plate fixation in the distal part of the femur: a report of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 2006,88(4):846–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yukata K, Doi K, Hattori Y, et al. Early breakage of a titanium volar locking plate for fixation of a distal radius fracture: case report. J Hand Surg Am, 2009,34(5): 907–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cartner JL, Messina A, Baker C, et al. Does insertion torque affect the mechanics of locking hole inserts and fatigue performance of bridge plate constructs? Bone Joint Sci, 2011,2(3):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ruedi TP, Murphy WM. AO principles of fracture management. Stuttgart New York: Thieme Verlag, 2000,139–230

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, et al. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability? Injury, 2007,38(3):358–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozkaya N, Nordin M. Fundamentals of Biomechanics, Equilibrium, Motion, and Deformation. New York, NY, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991,277–278

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brinker WO, Olmstead ML, Sumner-Smith G, et al. Manual of Internal Fixation in Small Animals. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 1998,1–289

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scott P, Elizabeth G, Roberto E. Fatigue analysis of plates used for fracture stabilization in small dogs and cats. Vet Surg, 2006,35(6):573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanchanomai C, Phiphobmongkol V, Muanjan P. Fatigue failure of an orthopedic implant-A locking compression plate. Eng Failure Anal, 2008,15(5):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffmeier KL, Hofmann GO, Mückley T. Choosing a proper working length can improve the lifespan of locked plates: A biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2011,26(4):405–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bellapianta J, Dow K, Pallotta NA, et al. Threaded screw head inserts improve locking plate biomechanical properties. J Orthop Trauma, 2011,25(2):65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dumbleton JH, Black J. Principles of mechanics. In: Black J, Dumbleton JH, eds. Clinical biomechanics: a case history approach. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1981,359–400

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tencer AF, Johnson KD, Kyle RF, et al. Biomechanics of fractures and fracture fixation. Instr Course Lect, 1993,42:19–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seide K, Triebe J, Faschingbauer M. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus-a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007,22(2): 176–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roe S. Internal Fracture Fixation: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 2003, 1798–1881

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sod GA. Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics: Initial and Initial Boundary-value Problems. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1986,321

    Google Scholar 

  25. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 2002,84(8):1093–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, et al. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma, 2004,18(8):488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Perren SM. Backgrounds of the technology of internal fixators. Injury, 2003,34(Suppl 2):B1–B3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D. Fracture healing: the diamond concept. Injury, 2007,38(Suppl 4):S3–S6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Epari DR, Kassi JP, Schell H, et al. Timely fracture-healing requires optimization of axial fixation stability. J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 2007,89(7):1575–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Firoozabadi R, McDonald E, Nguyen T-Q, et al. Does plugging unused combination screw holes improve the fatigue life of fixation with locking plates in comminuted supracondylar fractures of the femur? J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 2012,94(2):241–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wheeler KR, James LA. Fatigue behavior of type 316 stainless steel under simulated body conditions. J Biomed Mater Res, 1971,5(3):267–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brunner H, Simpson JP. Fatigue fracture of bone plates. Injury, 1980,11(3):203–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dawson DB, Pelloux RM. Corrosion fatigue crack growth of titanium alloys in aqueous environments. Metallurg Trans, 1974,5(3):723–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China

    Guo-hui Xu  (徐国辉), Bo Liu  (刘 勃), Qi Zhang  (张 奇), Juan Wang  (王 娟), Wei Chen  (陈 伟), Yue-ju Liu  (刘月驹), A-qin Peng  (彭阿钦) & Ying-ze Zhang  (张英泽)

Authors
  1. Guo-hui Xu  (徐国辉)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bo Liu  (刘 勃)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qi Zhang  (张 奇)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Wang  (王 娟)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wei Chen  (陈 伟)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yue-ju Liu  (刘月驹)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A-qin Peng  (彭阿钦)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ying-ze Zhang  (张英泽)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying-ze Zhang  (张英泽).

Additional information

This project was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2004AA421024).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Gh., Liu, B., Zhang, Q. et al. Biomechanical comparison of gourd-shaped LCP versus LCP for fixation of comminuted tibial shaft fracture. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 33, 250–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-013-1106-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-013-1106-y

Key words

Search

Navigation