Skip to main content
Log in

Study on S wave splitting in Dayao earthquake sequence with M=6.2 and M=6.1 in Yunnan in 2003

  • Published:
Acta Seismologica Sinica

Abstract

The polarization direction of fast wave and the delay time between fast and slow wave were measured for two earthquake sequences occurred continuously on 21 July (M=6.2) and 16 October (M=6.1) in Dayao, Yunnan in 2003 using cross-correlation coefficient method, after determining the high-resolution hypocentral locations of the earthquake sequences using the double-difference earthquake location algorithm. The results indicated that ① The phenomena of S wave splitting are obvious in the two earthquake sequences, and the average polarization directions of fast wave in most stations are almost consistent with regional maximum horizontal compressive stress direction except the station Santai. There are bimodal fast directions in the polarization directions at station Santai and the mean polarization direction is N80°E, indicating an inconsistent phenomenon referred to regional maximum horizontal compressive stress direction. ② There is no apparent relation between delay time and focal depth in the sequences, but the polarization direction show different character in different delay time range. ③ The comparison of S wave splitting results in the two earthquake sequences show that the polarization direction in M=6.2 earthquake sequence is more scattered and its average fast direction is 20° larger than that of M=6.1 sequence, and the delay times between two sequences show a little difference. ④ The spatial variation in S wave splitting polarization direction may be due to the stress disturbance imposed by the M=6.2 and the M=6.1 mainshocks on regional background stress field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Booth D C and Crampin S. 1985. Shear-wave polarizations on a curved wavefront at an isotropic free-surface[J]. Geophys J R astron Soc, 83: 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHEN Yun-tai. 2003. Seismic energy and seismic efficiency [A]. In: Department of Earthquake Prediction and Prevention, China Earthquake Administration eds. Seismic Parameters—The Application of Digital Seismology in the Study on Earthquake Prediction. [C] Beijing: Seismological Press, 51–72 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy G L and Boatwright J L. 1995. Global patterns of radiated seismic energy and apprent stess [J]. J Geophys Res, 100: 18 205–18 228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran E S, Vidale J E, Li Y G. 2003. Near-fault anisotropy following the Hector Mine earthquake [J]. J Geophys Res, 108(B9): 2436–2447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampin S, Peacock S, Gao Y, et al. 2004. The scatter of time delays in shear-wave splitting above small earthquakes [J]. Geophys J Int, 156: 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampin S, Volti T, Stefansson R. 1999. A successfully stress-forecast earthquake [J]. Geophys J Int, 138:F1–F5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampin S. 1978. Seismic wave propagation through a cracked solid: Polarization as possible dilatancy diagnostic [J]. Geophys J R Astron Soc, 53: 467–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J C. 1986. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology M]. Hoboken N J: John Wiley, 646.

    Google Scholar 

  • DING Guo-yu. 1991. Introduce of Lithospheric Geodynamics in China [M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1–68 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamar F and Bernard P. 1997. Shear wave anisotropy in the Erzincan basin and its relationship with crustal strain [J]. J Geophys Res, 102: 20 373–20 393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GAO Yuan and ZHENG Si-hua. 1994. Study on shear wave splitting in Tangshan region (II)—Correlation function analysis method [J]. Earthquake Research in China, 10(9): 22–32 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gephart J W. 1990. FMSI: A FORTRAN program for inverting fault/slickenside and earthquake focal mechanism data to obtain the regional stress tensor [J]. Comput & Geosci, 16(7): 953–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardebeck J L, Nazareth J J, Hauksson E. 1998. The static stress change triggering model: Constraints from two southern California aftershock sequences [J]. J Geophys Res, 103: 24 427–24 437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris R A. 1998. Introduction to special section: Stress triggering, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard [J]. J Geophys Res, 103: 24 347–24 358.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUA Wei, LIU Jie, ZHENG Si-hua, CHEN Zhang-li. 2006. The characteristic analysis and seismic triggering study of Dayao M=6.2 and M=6.1 earthquake sequences in 2003 [J]. Earthquake Research in China, 22(1): 10–23 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Li-ren and Ma Qing. 1997. Preliminary results on kinematic model of tectonic blocks derived from precision GPS obervations in southwest China [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 10(1): 27–34 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • King G C P, Stein R S, Lin J. 1994. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 84: 935–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAI Xi-an, XU Ju-sheng, ZHUOLI Ge-tu, et al. 2000. The fundamental characteristics of principal tectonic blocks present movement in Chinese mainland [J]. Earthquake Research in China, 16(3): 213–222 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary P C, Crampin S, McEvilly T V. 1990. Seismic fracture anisotropy in the Earth’s crust:An overview [J]. J Geophys Res, 95(7): 11 105–11 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • LI Bai-ji, QIN Jia-zheng, QIAN Xiao-dong. 2002. Shear-wave splitting of the aftershocks for the 1995 earthquake of Yunnan Wuding [J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 25(2): 108–114 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • LIU Kun, ZHANG Zhong-jie, HU Jia-fu, et al. 2001. The frequency relativity of S wave splitting and its meaning in Chinese [J]. Science in China (Series D), 31(2): 155–161 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y F, Teng T L, Ben-Zion Y. 2004. Systematic analysis of shear-wave splitting in the aftershock zone of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake: Shallow crustal anisotropy and lack of precursory variations [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 94(6): 2 330–2 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIU Zu-yin, SU You-jin, QIN Jia-zheng, et al. 2002. Seismic Activity of Yunnan, in 20th Century [M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 25–47 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia K V and Jupp P E. 2000. Directional Statistics [M]. Hoboken N J: John Wiley, 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttli O. 1961. The effect of earth’s surface on the S-wave particle motion [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 51: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada T, Matsuzawa T, Matsumoto S, et al. 1994. Shear wave splitting observed in the southwestern part of Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan [J]. J phys Earth, 42: 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada Y. 1992. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in half-space [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 82: 1 018–1 040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng Z and Ben-Zion Y. 2004. Systematic analysis of crustal anisotropy along the Karadere-Düzce branch of the North Anatolian fault [J]. Geophys J Int, 159: 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng Z and Ben-Zion Y. 2005. Spatiotemporal variations of crustal anisotropy from similar events in aftershocks of the 1999 M=7.4 Izmit and M=7.1 Düzce, Turkey, earthquake sequences [J]. Geophys J Int, 160: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QIAN Xiao-dong, LI Bai-ji, QIN Jia-zheng. 2002. Study on shear wave splitting for sequence of the aftershocks of Yao’an M s=6.5 earthquake in Yunnan [J]. Earthquake Research in China, 18(2): 157–165 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage M K, Shih X R, Meyer R P, et al. 1989. Shear-wave anisotropy of active tectonic regions via automated S-wave polarization analysis [J]. Tectonophysics, 165: 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer P M. 1999. Introduction to Seismology [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih X R and Meyer R P. 1990. Observation of shear wave splitting from nature events: South Moat of Long Valley caldera, California, June 29 to August 12, 1982 [J]. J Geophys Res, 95: 11 179–11 196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WU Zhong-liang. 2003. Radiated seismic energy and source spectrum [A]. In: Department of Earthquake Prediction and Prevention, China Earthquake Administration eds. Seismic Parameters—The Application of Digital Seismology in the Study on Earthquake Prediction. [C] Beijing: Seismological Press, 73–81 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M and Brune J N. 1968. Seismic moment, stress, and source dimensions for earthquakes in the California-Nevada region [J]. J Geophys Res, 73: 4 681–4 694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z and Schwartz S Y. 1994. Seismic anisotropy in the shallow crust of the Loma Prieta segment of the San Andreas fault system [J]. J Geophys Res, 99: 9 651–9 661.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Wei  (华 卫).

Additional information

Foundation item: National Program on Key Basic Projects (2004CB418406), Program for the Tenth Five-Year Plan of China (2004BA601B01-04-03) and Joint Seismological Science Foundation of China (606042).

Contribution No. 06FE3019, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration.

About this article

Cite this article

Hua, W., Liu, J., Chen, Zl. et al. Study on S wave splitting in Dayao earthquake sequence with M=6.2 and M=6.1 in Yunnan in 2003. Acta Seimol. Sin. 19, 380–396 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-004-0380-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-004-0380-1

Key words

CLC number

Navigation