Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal contracting with effort and misvaluation

  • Published:
Mathematics and Financial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a new continuous-time contracting model, in which the firm value process can only be observed with noise, and there are two sources of moral hazard: the agent’s effort and misvaluation. The principal can induce the agent to alter the perceived fundamental value of the firm through misvaluation, thus changing the market estimate of that value. We consider two cases in detail: the one in which the market correctly anticipates only the effort, and the other in which it correctly anticipates both the effort and the amount of misvaluation. In the first case, we find that it is optimal for the principal to induce the agent to apply a non-zero amount of misvaluation. Using calculus of variation techniques, we find the optimal pay-per-performance sensitivity (PPS) of the contract and optimal effort and misvaluation amount, by means of solving of a second order ordinary differential equation. In the second case, which can be viewed as an extension of the seminal Holmstrom-Milgrom model to the case of noisy observations, we find that the optimal misvaluation value is zero, and we compare the resulting optimal contract to the Holmstrom-Milgrom contract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auzinger, W., Kneisl, G., Koch, O., Weinmuller, E.: SBVP 1.0—A MATLAB Solver for Singular Boundary Value Problems, Technical Report, Vienna University of Technology, 2011

  2. Balsam S., Bartov E., Marquardt C.: Accrual management, investor sophistication, and equity valuation: evidence from 10-Q filings. J. Account. Res. 40(4), 987–1012 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biais B., Mariotti T., Plantin G., Rochet J.-C.: Dynamic security design: convergence to continuous time and asset pricing implications. Rev. Econ. Stud. 74(2), 345–390 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cadenillas A., Cvitanić J., Zapatero F.: Optimal risk-sharing with effort and project choice. J. Econ. Theory 133, 403–440 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Capponi A., Cvitanić J.: Credit risk modeling with misreporting and incomplete information. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Financ. 12, 81–112 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Capponi, A., Cvitanić, J., Yolcu, T.: A variational approach to contracting under imperfect observations. SIAM J. Financ. Math. (2012)

  7. Clarke, F.H.: Methods of Dynamics and Nonsmooth Optimization, vol. 57, pp. 30–40. Capital city press, Montpelier, Vermont (1989)

  8. Cvitanić J., Zhang J.: Optimal compensation with adverse selection and dynamic actions. Math. Financ. Econ. 1, 21–55 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cvitanić J., Wan X., Zhang J.: Optimal compensation with hidden action and lump-sum payment in a continuous-time model. Appl. Math. Optim. 59, 99–146 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. DeMarzo P.M., Sannikov Y.: Optimal security design and dynamic capital structure in a continuous-time agency model. J. Financ. 61, 2681–2724 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duffie D., Lando D.: Term structure of credit spreads with incomplete accounting information. Econometrica 63, 633–664 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrarin, G., Giudici, P.: Financial scandals and the role of private enforcement: the Parmalat case. ECGI Law Working Paper 40, 2005

  13. Gibbons, R.: Lecture Note 1: Agency Theory. Preprint available at http://web.mit.edu/rgibbons/www/903LN1S10.pdf, 2010

  14. Holmstrom B., Milgrom P.: Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2), 303–328 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jensen, M.: Agency costs of overvalued equity. Financ. Manag. 34(1) (2005)

  16. Liptser R.S., Shiryaev A.N.: Statistics of Random Processes II. Applications. Springer, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Müller H.: The first-best sharing rule in the continuous-time principal-agent problem with exponential utility. J. Econ. Theory 79, 276–280 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Ou-Yang H.: An equilibrium model of asset pricing and moral hazard. Rev. Financ. Stud. 18, 1253–1303 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schättler H., Sung J.: The first-order approach to continuous-time principal-agent problem with exponential utility. J. Econ. Theory 61, 331–371 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Schättler H., Sung J.: On optimal sharing rules in discrete and continuous-times principal-agent problems with exponential utility. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 21, 551–574 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sung J.: Linearity with project selection and controllable diffusion rate in continuous-time principal-agent problems. Rand. J. Econ. 26, 720–743 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sung J.: Corporate insurance and managerial incentives. J. Econ. Theory 74, 297–332 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Tonelli, L.: Sur une mithode directe du calcd des variations. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 39 (1915)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakša Cvitanić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capponi, A., Cvitanić, J. & Yolcu, T. Optimal contracting with effort and misvaluation. Math Finan Econ 7, 93–128 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-012-0088-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-012-0088-z

Keywords

Navigation