Skip to main content
Log in

On admissible strategies in robust utility maximization

  • Published:
Mathematics and Financial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existence of optimal strategy in robust utility maximization is addressed when the utility function is finite on the entire real line. A delicate problem in this case is to find a “good definition” of admissible strategies to admit an optimizer. Under certain assumptions, especially a kind of time-consistency property of the set \({\mathcal{P}}\) of probabilities which describes the model uncertainty, we show that an optimal strategy is obtained in the class of those whose wealths are supermartingales under all local martingale measures having a finite generalized entropy with one of \({P\in\mathcal{P}}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ansel J.-P., Stricker C.: Couverture des actifs contingents et prix maximum. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Stat. 30, 303–315 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellini F., Frittelli M.: On the existence of minimax martingale measures. Math. Financ. 12, 1–21 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Biagini S., Černý A.: Admissible strategies in semimartingale portfolio selection. SIAM J. Control Optim. 49, 42–72 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Biagini S., Frittelli M.: The supermartingale property of the optimal wealth process for general semimartingales. Financ. Stoch. 11, 253–266 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Delbaen, F.: The structure of m-stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neutral measures. In: In memoriam Paul-André Meyer: Séminaire de Probabilités XXXIX, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1874, pp. 215–258. Springer, Berlin (2006)

  6. Delbaen F., Schachermayer W.: The mathematics of arbitrage. Springer Finance. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delbaen F., Grandits P., Rheinländer T., Samperi D., Schweizer M., Stricker C.: Exponential hedging and entropic penalties. Math. Financ. 12, 99–123 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Föllmer H., Gundel A.: Robust projections in the class of martingale measures. Ill. J. Math. 50, 439–472 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Föllmer H., Schied A., Weber S.: Robust preferences and robust portfolio choice. In: Bensoussan, A., Zhang, Q., Ciarlet, P.G. (eds.) Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Methods in Finance, Handbook of Numerical Analysis, pp. 29–88. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frittelli, M., Rosazza Gianin, E.: Equivalent formulations of reasonable asymptotic elasticity. Tech. Rep. 12, Dept. Matematica per le Decisioni, University of Florence (2004)

  11. Goll T., Rüschendorf L.: Minimax and minimal distance martingale measures and their relationship to portfolio optimization. Financ. Stoch. 5, 557–581 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacod, J.: Intégrales stochastiques par rapport à une semimartingale vectorielle et changements de filtration. In: Séminaire de Probabilités, XIV, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 784, pp. 161–172. Springer, Berlin (1980)

  13. Jacod J., Shiryaev A.N.: Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes. Grundlehren. Math. Wiss. vol. 288, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kabanov Y.M., Stricker C.: On the optimal portfolio for the exponential utility maximization: remarks to the six-author paper. Math. Financ. 12, 125–134 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kramkov D., Schachermayer W.: The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9, 904–950 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kramkov D., Schachermayer W.: Necessary and sufficient conditions in the problem of optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 13, 1504–1516 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Owari K.: Robust utility maximization with unbounded random endowment. Adv. Math. Econ. 14, 147–181 (2011a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Owari, K.: Duality in robust utility maximization with unbounded claim via a robust extenstion of Rockafellar’s theorem. Preprint arXiv:1101.2968v1 (2011b)

  19. Owari K.: A note on utility maximization with unbounded random endowment. Asia-Pac. Financ. Mark. 18, 89–103 (2011c)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Schachermayer W.: Optimal investment in incomplete markets when wealth may become negative. Ann. Appl. Probab. 11, 694–734 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Schachermayer W.: A super-martingale property of the optimal portfolio process. Financ. Stoch. 7, 433–456 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Schied A.: Optimal investments for risk- and ambiguity-averse preferences: a duality approach. Financ. Stoch. 11, 107–129 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Schied A., Wu C.-T.: Duality theory for optimal investments under model uncertainty. Stat. Decis. 23, 199–217 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Strasser, E.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the supermartingale property of a stochastic integral with respect to a local martingale. In: Séminaire de Probabilités XXXVII, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1832, pp. 385–393. Springer, Berlin (2003)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keita Owari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Owari, K. On admissible strategies in robust utility maximization. Math Finan Econ 6, 77–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-012-0068-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-012-0068-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation