Skip to main content
Log in

Was ist dran am skandinavischen Modell?

Eine vergleichende Betrachtung

What’s so Fine with the Scandinavian Model? A Comparative Analysis

  • Aufsätze
  • Published:
Leviathan

Abstract

Scandinavia is, in spite of a few weaknesses still a socio-economic model for countries that do not want to follow the Anglo-Saxon route of far-reaching liberalization of the labour market and the welfare state. Most striking is the combination of high employment (including high public sector employment), the facilitation of employment for women, relatively low inequality and poverty, solid public finances and top-level competitiveness, particularly in Denmark, Finland and Sweden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aarvaag Stokke, Torgeir und Christer Thörnqvist, 2001: Strikes and Collective Bargaining in the Nordic Countries, in European Journal of Industrial Relations 7(3), S. 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsen, Peter, 2006: Welfare Reform. Renewal or Deviation?, in: John L. Campbell, John A. Hall und Ove K. Pederson (Hrsg.), National Identity and a Variety of Capitalism: The Case of Denmark, Montreal: McGill University Press, S. 356–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Peder, 1997: Wonderful Denmark?, in: CPB Report 97/2, S. 46–47.

  • Andersen, Torben M. und Michael Svarer, 2008: Flexicurity — Labour Market Performance in Denmark, erscheint in: CESifo Economic Studies; doi:101093/cesifo/ifm015.

  • Anxo, Dominique und Harald Niklasson, 2002: The Swedish Model in Turbulent Times: Decline or Renaissance? Labor and Employment Relations Association Series. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting.

  • Becker, Uwe, 2005a: The German Contrast. On Bad Comparisons, Special Circumstances, Luck and Policies that Turned Out to be Wrong, in: Uwe Becker und Herman Schwartz (Hrsg.), Employment Miracles. A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, S. 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Uwe, 2005b: An Example of Competitive Corporatism?. The Dutch Political Economy 1983–2003 in Critical Examination, in: Journal of European Public Policy 12(6), S. 1078–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Uwe und Herman Schwartz, 2005: Conclusion: the Importance of Lucky Circumstances, and Still the Liberal — Social Democratic Divide, in: dies. (Hrsg.), Employment Miracles. A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, S. 231–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, David G., 2007: International Patterns of Union Membership, in: British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1), S. 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, Mark, 2002: Great Transformations. Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, David H. und John D. Stephens, 2007: Employment Performance in OECD Countries. A Test of Neoliberal and Institutional Hypotheses, in: Comparative Political Studies 40(12), S. 1486–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredgaard, Thomas, Flemming Larsen und Per K. Madsen, 2005: The Flexible Danish Labour Market, in Carma Research Papers, Alborg University.

  • Compston, Hugh und Per K. Madsen, 2001: Conceptual Innovation and Public Policy: Unemployment and Paid Leave Schemes in Denmark, in: Journal of European Social Policy 11(2), S. 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, James B, Susanna Sandstrom, Anthony Shorrocks und Edward N. Wolff, 2008: The World Distribution of Household Wealth, London/Helsinki/New York: eScholarship Repository.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, Barry, 2006: The European Economy since 1945: Coordinated Capitalism and Beyond, Princeton University Press.

  • Elvander, Nils, 2002: The New Swedish Regime for Collective Bargaining and Conflict Resolution: A Comparative Perspective, in: European Journal of Industrial Relations 8(2), S. 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Britannica Online, o.J.: Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.

  • Esping-Anderson, Gösta, 1985: Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gösta, 2007: Sociological Explanations of Changing Income Distribution, in: American Behavioral Scientist 50(5), S. 639–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etla, 2003: Nokia in the Finnish Economy; http://brie-etla.org/_pdf/wef_rouvinen_yla-antilla_wirelless_finland.pdf.

  • European Commission, 2003: The Social Situation in the European Union, Brüssel: Europäische Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2004: European Competitiveness Report 2004, Luxemburg: Eur-Op.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2006: Spring Economic Forecasts 2006, Brüssel, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Förster, Michael und Marco Mira d’Ercole, 2005: Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s, in: OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 22, OECD Publishing.

  • Gallie, David, 2007: Production Regimes and the Quality of Employment in Europe, in: Annual Review of Sociology 33, S. 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer und Anders Lindbom, 2005: Employment and Unemployment in Denmark and Sweden: Success or Failure for the Universal Welfare Model?, in: Uwe Becker und Herman Schwartz (Hrsg.), Employment Miracles. A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, S. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselius, Patrik, 2006: Work Absence and Social Security in Sweden, Department of Economics, Uppsala University; www.sns.se/document/nber2_oh.pdf.

  • ITC, 2004: International Trade Statistics. Country Market Analysis Profiles, New York: International Trade Center (Unctad/WTO; www.intracen.org/mensu/countries.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  • ITT, 2004: The European Innovation Scoreboard 2004, Innovation and Technology Transfer (European Commission), Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalina, Thorsten und Claudia Weinkopf, 2008: Weitere Zunahme der Niedriglohnbeschäftigung, IAQ-Report 2008-01, Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation, Universität Duisburg-Essen.

  • Kiander, Jaakko, 2005: The Evolution of the Finnish Model in the 1990s: From Depression to High-Tech Boom, in: Uwe Becker und Herman Schwartz (Hrsg.), Employment Miracles. A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, S. 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter und Joakim Palme, 2003: New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalisation: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95, in: American Political Science Review 97, S. 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall, Johannes, 2004: The Politics of Purpose: Swedish Macroeconomic Policy After the Golden Age, Göteborg: Göteborg Studies in Politics 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, Pauli, 2004: The Nordic Model and Consensual Competitiveness in Finland, in: Anders Castén et al.: Between Sociology and History. Essays on Microhistory, Collective Action, and Nation-Building, Helsinki: SKS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, Per K., 1999: Denmark: Flexibility, security and labor market success, ILO Employment & Training Papers 53, Geneva; www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/strat/publ/etp53.html.

  • Milner, Henry, 2001: Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work, Hanover N.H: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, Eli und Kari Lilja, 2005: Change in Coordinated market Economies: The Case of Nokia and Finland, in: G. Morgan et al., Changing Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 352–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1999: Employment Outlook 1999, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2004: Employment Outlook 2004, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2006a: Employment Outlook 2006, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2006b: Statistics Portal. Productivity Database, September 2006, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2007: Employment Outlook 2007, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, o.j.: OECD Electronic Database, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • Plougmann, Peter und Per K. Madsen, 2002: Flexibility, Employment development and Active Labour Market Policy in Denmark and Sweden in the 1990s, in: CEPA Working Paper 2002-04, New York: New School University, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, David, 2005a: How to Reduce Sickness Absences in Sweden: Lessons from International Experience, OECD, Economics Department, Working Paper 442, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, David, 2005b: Getting Better Value for Money From Sweden’s Health Care System, OECD, Economics Department, Working Paper 443, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 1987: Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Das Modell Deutschland im Vergleich, Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, Martin, 2004: Musterland mit Schwächen. Wirtschafts- und Arbeitsmarktentwicklung in der Schweiz, IWG Impulse, Bonn: Institut für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, Hans-Werner, 2005: Die Basar-Ökonomie. Deutschland: Exportweltmeister oder Schlusslicht?, Berlin: Econ Business Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF, 2006: World Competitiveness Report 2006–2007, Basel: World Economic Forum; www.wefroum.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • WKO, 2003: Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003, Wien: Wirtschaftskammern Österreichs.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, 2003: International Trade Statistics 2003, Geneva: World Trade Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, U. Was ist dran am skandinavischen Modell?. Leviathan 36, 229–248 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-008-0013-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-008-0013-2

Navigation