Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wer ist das schwache Geschlecht? Zur Sterblichkeit von Männern und Frauen innerhalb und außerhalb der Ehe

Who is the weaker sex? On the mortality of men and women inside and outside of marriage

  • Aufsätze
  • Published:
Leviathan

Abstract

In the middle of the life-cycle unmarried persons have much higher death rates than married ones. The differential is significantly greater for men than for women. A comparative historical data collection shows that this pattern of gendered inequality persisted from the 1920s over the 1970s to the 1990s. Comparing the gender-specific death rates within a given marital status, the highest gender gaps in mortality are reached in case of divorce or bereavement, where the male death rate is usually more than three times higher than the female one. The gendered reaction to the loss of the spouse calls for a sociological explanation. Abstracting from selection effects, a wide range of hypotheses is considered ranging from feminist sociology to socio-biologist ideas. The central hypothesis advanced here is that men die over-proportionately in case of divorce or bereavement, because they are more dependent upon the sexual and emotional attachment to their spouse, whereas women more frequently have emotionally rewarding contacts to other persons outside the conjugal relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Beauvoir, Simone de, 1968 [1949]: Das andere Geschlecht. Sitte und Sexus der Frau, Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Megan K. und Marc N. Elliott, 2002: Does the Association Between Marital Status and Health Vary by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity?, Santa Monica: RAND Corporation (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, John, 1981: Loss: Sadness and Depression, Vol. 3 of Attachment and Loss, Harmonds-worth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, David M., 1989a: Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures, in: Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(1), S. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, David M., 1989b: Toward an evolutionary psychology of human mating, in: Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(1), S. 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, Nancy, 1978: The Reproduction of Mothering, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, Nancy, 1989: Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Russell D. und Elaine Hatfield, 1989: Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers, in: Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality 2(1), S. 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creveld, Martin van, 2003: Das bevorzugte Geschlecht, München: Gerling Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Simon, 1990: Men as Success Objects and Women as Sex Objects: A Study of Personal Advertisements, in: Sex Roles 23(1/2), S. 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile, 1987 [1897]: Der Selbstmord. Dt. von Hanne und Sebastian Herkommer, Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, Alan, 1990: Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, S. 981–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, Alan, 1992: Gender Differences in Mate Selection Preferences: A Test of the Parental Investment Model, in: Psychological Bulletin 112(1), S. 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Victor R., 1983: Who Shall Live? Health Economics and Social Choice, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol, 1982: In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, Walter R., 1972: Sex, Marital Status and Suicide, in: Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 13(2), S. 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, Walter R., 1973: Sex, Marital Status, and Mortality, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 79(1), S. 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, Walter R., Hee-Choon Shin, 1989: The Psychological Well-Being of Divorced and Widowed Men and Women. An Empirical Analysis, in: Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 10(1), S. 122–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John, 1992: Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Fred, 1976: Social Limits to Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, James S., Karl R. Landis und Debra Umberson, 1988: Social Relationships and Health, in: Science 341, S. 540–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, Felicia A. und Joyce E. Whittington, 1995: Symptoms of psychological distress predict 7-year mortality, in: Psychological Medicine 25, S. 1073–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, Janet Shibley, 1990: Meta-Analysis and the Psychology of Gender Differences, in: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16(1), S. 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jónasdóttir, Anna G., 1991: Love Power and Political Interests. Towards a Theory of Patriarchy in Contemporary Western Societies, Örebro Studies 7, Örebro: University of Örebro, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter, 2000: Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States, in: Social Politics, Vol. 7, S. 127–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, Edgar, 2000: Sterblichkeit und fernere Lebenserwartung von Versicherten rentnern der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung — Aktuelle Ergebnisse einer Sterbetafelberechnung für 1996/1998. Deutsche Rentenversicherung Heft 3–4, März/April, S. 121–138.

  • Laumann, Edward O., John H. Gagnon, Robert T. Michael und Stuart Michaels, 1994: The Social Organization of Sexuality. Sexual Practices in the United States, Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Heiner und Jacqui Smith, 1999: Psychological predictors of mortality in old age, in: Journal of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences 54(1), S. 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Heiner und James W. Vaupel, 2000: Human Longevity: Trends and Determinants. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Paper prepared for: R.K. Silbereisen et al. (Hrsg.), Bericht über den 42. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Jena 2000.

  • Oliver, Mary Beth und Janet Shibley Hyde, 1993: Gender Differences in Sexuality: A Meta-Analysis, in: Psychological Bulletin 114(1), S. 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Michael D., 2001: Looking Back at Life and Its Influence on Subjective Well-Being, in: Journal of Gerontological Social Work 35(2).

  • Pines, Ayala Malach, 1999: Falling in Love: Why We Choose the Lovers We Choose, New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinzing, Friedrich, 1930f.: Die Sterblichkeit nach dem Familienstand, in: Friedrich Prinzing, Handbuch der medizinischen Statistik, 2. Aufl., 2. Halbband, Jena, S. 417–423.

  • Reil-Held, Anette, 2002: Die Rolle intergenerationaler Transfers in Einkommen und Vermögen älterer Menschen in Deutschland, Mannheim: Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Dissertation (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Bo, 2002: Explaining Modern Patriarchy. A Theory of Asymmetric Mate Selection. Göteborg University, Department of Political Science (mimeo).

  • Rubin, L.B., 1983: Intimate Strangers: Men and Women Together, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Zick, Letitia Anne Peplau und Charles T. Hill, 1981: Loving and Leaving: Sex Differences in Romantic Attachments, in: Sex Roles 7(8), S. 821–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumaker, Sally A. und D. Robin Hill, 1991: Gender Differences in Social Support and Physical Health, in: Health Psychology, Vol. 10(2), S. 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Eleanor R., Michael A. Becker, Donn Byrne und David P.J. Przybyla, 1993: Sexual Attitudes of Males and Females as Predictors of Interpersonal Attraction and Marital Compatibility, in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23(13), S. 1011–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt, 1981: Statistisches Jahrbuch für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt, 2002: Statistisches Jahrbuch 2002 für das Ausland, Wiesbaden (PDF-Version).

  • United Nations, 1998: Demographic Yearbook 1996, Vol. 48, New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, 1975: Demographic Yearbook 1974, Vol. 26, New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zick, Cathleen D., Smith, Ken R., 1991: Marital Transitions, Poverty, and Gender Differences in Mortality, in: Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 53, S. 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Diana M., Stanislav V. Kasl und Adrian M. Ostfeld, 1984: Psychosocial Predictors of Mortality Among the Elderly Poor, in: American Journal of Epidemiology 119(3), S. 410–423.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jens Alber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Ich danke Martina Sander, Anna Verena Münch und Florian Fliegner für technische Hilfen. Für hilfreiche kritische Kommentare zu früheren Entwürfen bin ich den Kollegen Ellen Immergut, Ulrich Kohler, Bo Rothstein und Reinhart Schneider zu Dank verpflichtet. Reinhard Spree danke ich dafür, dass er mich auf den mir unbekannten Datensatz für die 1920er Jahre aufmerksam gemacht hat.

About this article

Cite this article

Alber, J. Wer ist das schwache Geschlecht? Zur Sterblichkeit von Männern und Frauen innerhalb und außerhalb der Ehe. Leviathan 33, 3–39 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-005-0024-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-005-0024-1

Search

Navigation