Skip to main content
Log in

Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective

  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers the use of mixed methods in international business research by reviewing empirical studies in four major journals. A total of 484 articles were reviewed, 68 of which had applied a mixed method strategy.

In our analysis we categorize mixed methods according to their use in different stages of the research process and provide a range of alternative designs for mixing qualitative and quantitative methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, P. H./ Skaates, M. A., Ensuring Validity in Qualitative International Business Research, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 464–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J./ Toulan, O./ Arnold, D., Global Account Management in Multinational Corporations: Theory and Evidence, Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 2, 2001, pp. 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Publishing Qualitative Research in International Business, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 570–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Further Reflections on their Integration, in Brannen, J. (ed.), Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, Aldershot: Avebury 1992, pp. 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T./ Fiske D. W., Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix, Psychological Bulletin, 56, 2, 1959, pp. 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T./ Gospel, H./ Montgomery, J., Running on the Spot? A Review of Twenty Years of Research on the Management of Human Resources in Comparative and International Perspective, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10, 3, 1999, pp. 520–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T./ Pugh, D. S., Foreign Country Priorities in the Internationalisation Process: A Measure and an Exploratory Test on British Firms, International Business Review, 10, 3, 2001, pp. 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, Thousand Oaks: Sage 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks: Sage 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W./ Plano Clark, V. L./ Gutmann, M. L./ Hanson, W. E., Advanced Mixed Methods Research Designs, in Tashakkori, A./ Teddlie, C. (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage 2003, pp. 209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, L./ Young, C./ Lee, M., Methodological Triangulation in Measuring Public Transportation Service Quality, Transportation Journal, 40, 1, 2000, pp. 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. H., Qualitative Research in Organizational Behaviour, Journal of Management Studies, 20, 3, 1983, pp. 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, New York: McGraw Hill 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, F./ Reeb D., Ranking the International Business Journals, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 4, 2000, pp. 689–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H./ Chu, W., The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-automaker Relationships in the U.S., Japan, and Korea, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 2, 2000, pp. 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger, C./ Kelle, U., Making Inferences in Mixed Methods: The Rules of Integration, in Tashakkori, A./ Teddlie, C. (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage 2003, pp. 457–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, J./ Hooley, G./ Cox, T./ Beracs, J./ Fonfara, K./ Snoj, B., The Development and Impact of Marketing Capabilities in Central Europe, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 1, 2000, pp. 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, M./ Edwards, R./ Buckley, P. J., Is Cultural Similarity Misleading? The Experience of Australian Manufacturers in Britain, International Business Review, 12, 3, 2003, pp. 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurmerinta-Peltomäki, L./ Nummela, N., First the Sugar, then the Eggs ... Or the Other Way Round? Mixing Methods in International Business Research, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 162–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D., Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 4, 1979, pp. 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B./ Turner, L. A., Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Method Research, in Tashakkori, A./ Teddlie, C. (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage 2003, pp. 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenartowicz, T./ Johnson, J. P., Comparing Managerial Values in Twelve Latin American Countries: An Exploratory Study, Management International Review, 42, 3, 2002, pp. 279–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manrai, L. A./ Manrai, A. K./ Lascu, D.-N., A Country-cluster Analysis of the Distribution and Promotion Infrastructure in Central and Eastern Europe, International Business Review, 10, 5, 2001, pp. 517–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C., Qualitative Research Methods in International Business: The State of the Art, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C./ Penttinen, H./ Tahvanainen, M., Interviewing in the Multinational Corporation: Challenges of the Organisational Context, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 244–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas, in McGrath, J. E./ Martin, J./ Kulka, R. A. (eds.), Judgement Calls in Research, Beverly Hills: Sage 1982, pp. 69–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall, M./ Beaty, D./ Oddou, G. R., Where Have All the Theorists Gone? An Archival Review of the International Management Literature, International Journal of Management, 10, 2, 1993, pp. 146–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michailova, S., Contextualising Fieldwork: Reflections on Conducting Research in Eastern Europe, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, R. B., Word-of-Mouth Referral Sources for Buyers of International Corporate Financial Services, Journal of World Business, 35, 3, 2000, pp. 314–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M., Principles of Mixed Methods and Multimethod Research Design, in Tashakkori, A./ Teddlie, C. (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage 2003, pp. 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, I./ Ridenour, C. S./ Newman, C./ DeMarco G. M. P., A Typology of Research Purposes and Its Relationship to Mixed Methods, in Tashakkori, A./ Teddlie, C. (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage 2003, pp. 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann, M., Triangulation: A Methodological Discussion, The International Journal of Tourism Research, 2, 2, 2000, pp. 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q., Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Newbury Park: Sage 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J., Between-method Triangulation in Organizational Diagnosis, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 4, 2, 1996, pp. 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W./ York, A. S., Behind Intermediary Performance in Export Trade: Transactions, Agents, and Resources, Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 2, 2001, pp. 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, B./ Welch, L., International Retailing Operations: Downstream Entry and Expansion via Franchising, International Business Review, 9, 4, 2000, pp. 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. B., Empirical Research in International Management: A Critique and Future Agenda, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, T. S./ Bliss, L. A./ Gallagher, S./ Pérez-Prado, A., Taking the Next Step: Mixed Methods Research in Organizational Systems, Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21, 1, 2003, pp. 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, T. A./ Williams, E. A., Research Methodology in Management: Current Practices, Trends, and Implications for Future Research, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 6, 2000, pp. 1248–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L./ Sidani, S., Quantitative and Qualitative Methods: Is There an Alternative?, Evaluation and Program Planning, 18, 1, 1995, pp. 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, X., Antecedent Factors of International Business Negotiations in the China Context, Management International Review, 41, 2, 2001, pp. 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A./ Teddlie, C., Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks: Sage 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C./ Tashakkori, A., Major Issues and Controversies in the Use of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, in Tashakkori, A./ Teddlie, C. (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage 2003, pp. 3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa, M. R./ Mueller, S. L./ Thomas, A. S., Cultural Fit and Job Satisfaction in a Global Service Environment, Management International Review, 43, 2, 2003, pp. 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J./ Campbell, D. T./ Schwartz, R. D./ Sechrest, L., Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences, Chicago: Rand McNally 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edition, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, D. E./ Welch, L. S., Getting Published: The Last Great Hurdle?, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./ Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 551–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S., Recent Developments in International Management Research: A Review of 20 Top Management Journals, Journal of Management, 28, 3, 2002, pp. 277–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurmerinta-Peltomäki, L., Nummela, N. Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. MANAGE. INT. REV. 46, 439–459 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0100-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0100-z

Keywords

Navigation