Abstract
During the last decades, a globalized and free market economy has become the worldwide accepted paradigm for organizing economic affairs. Indeed many positive effects of globalization have materialized and improved the wellbeing of humans, particularly in the poorer parts of the world. However, there is a dark side to globalization—negative external effects, e.g. the exploitation and destruction of natural resources—that is causing growing discontent (e.g. Stiglitz, Globalization and its discontents. Penguin, London, 2002). Different initiatives have been taken in order to deal with the deficits of globalization but have not yet resulted in a resounding success. This paper deals with the downsides of globalization and is not telling a “success story”. For this reason, it is a scholarly article and an essay at the same time, dealing with its subject sometimes from a personal point of view. After presenting some examples for negative side effects of our current economic system, it is argued that capitalism is not only promoting growth through innovation, but that it follows a path of greed and exploitation. Building on path dependence theory, self-reinforcing mechanisms are identified that lead into a lock-in of the current path and make it hard to alter its course. Against this background, three suggestions to tackle the deficits of globalization are presented and critically discussed—the Principles for Responsible Education (PRME), the attempt to restrict globalization (e.g. Steingart), and the implementation of a global governance system (e.g. Homann). Finally, a careful conclusion is drawn: A sequenced approach of education, sanction, and institution building might be the best solution to fasten up the slow moving process of fixing the shortcomings of globalization. It has to be clearly understood that this is not a contribution aimed against globalization and global competition. However, the issues raised in this article urgently need to be addressed. It logically follows that further research is needed in time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchian A (1950) Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. J Polit Econ 58:211–221
Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99:116–131
Arthur WB (1994) Increasing returns and path dependency in the economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Becker G (1957) The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Beckman CM, Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ Sci 19:3–24
Bogan CE, English MJ (1994) Benchmarking for best practices. Winning through innovative adaptation. Mc Graw-Hill, New York
Boxwell RJ (1994) Benchmarking for competitive advantage. Mc Graw-Hill, New York
Britannica (2014) Essay, encyclopaedia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/192869/essay. Accessed 10th June 2014
Coleman JS (1986) Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. Am J Sociol 91(1986):1309–1335
David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75:332–337
Denzau AT, North DC (1994) Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos 47(1994):3–31
Haase, M., Roedenbeck, M., Söllner, A. (2009), A sketch of a mechanism-based explanation of cognitive path processes, lock-in of individual mental models and institutional rigidity, in: Scherer, A.G., Kaufmann, I.M., Patzer, M. (Ed.), Methoden in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Wiesbaden 2009, 21-46
Hiß S (2009a) Corporate social responsibility—innovation Oder tradition? Zum Wandel der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen in Deutschland. Zfwu 10(3):287–303
Hiß S (2009) From implicit to explicit corporate social responsibility: institutional change as a fight for myths. Bus Ethics Q 19/3:433–451
Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/Mass
Homann K (1991) Der Sinn der Unternehmensethik in der Marktwirtschaft. In: Corsten u.a. H (ed) Die soziale dimension der Unternehmung, Berlin, pp 97–118
Homann K (1994) Marktwirtschaft und Unternehmensethik. In: Forum für Philosophie Bad Homburg (Hrsg.), Markt und Moral—Die Diskussion um die Unternehmensethik, Bern u.a., pp 109–130
Homann K (2006) Competition and morality, discussion paper no. 2006-4, edited by Wittenberg-Center for Global Ethics, Zentrum für Globale Ethik e.V
Homann K (2007) Globalization from a business ethics point of view. In: Homann, K, Kowlowski P, Luetge C (eds) Globalisation and business ethics, Aldershot, pp 3–9
Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16(1):46. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/
Kinderman D (2011) ‘Free us up so we can be responsible!’ The co-evolution of corporate social responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socio Econ Rev 2011:1–29
Krugman PR (1979) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. J Int Econ 9(4):469–479
Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kulik CT, Bainbridge HTJ, Cregan C (2008) Known by the company we keep: stigma-by-association effects in the workplace. Acad Manag Rev 33:216–230
Leibenstein H (1950) Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. Q J Econ 64:183–207
Mirkovic S (2013) Corporate legitimacy in a postnational constellation. Sitting on the fence between private authority and legitimacy crisis. PhD Thesis, Europa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder)
North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
North DC (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Pies I, Hielscher S, Beckmann M (2009) Moral commitments and the societal role of business: an ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Bus Ethics Q 19(3):S375–S401
Rappaport A (1986) Creating shareholder value: the new standard for business performance. Free Press, New York
Reagan R (1981) Inaugural address. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=43130. Accessed 20 January 1981
Ricardo D (1817) Principles of political economy and taxation. J.M. Dent & Sons, London/New York, p 1911
Richter R (2011) German “Ordnungstheorie”. In: Annual conference from the Perspective of the New Institutional Economics, ISNIE, Stanford
Shleifer A (2004) Does competition destroy ethical behavior? Am Econ Rev 94(2):414–418
Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev 63(2):129–138
SmithA (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Strahan and Cadell, London
Spiegel-online (2009) Schmutziges Mafia-Geschäft. 120 Behälter Atommüll im Mittelmeer versenkt. http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/schmutziges-mafia-geschaeft-120-behaelter-atommuell-im-mittelmeer-versenkt-a-648978.html. Accessed 1 May 2014
Steingart G (2008) War for wealth: the truth about globalization and why the flat world is broken. McGraw-Hill, New York
Stigler GJ (1987) Competition. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P (eds) The New Palgrave: a dictionary of economics. The New Palgrave dictionary of economics online, Palgrave Macmillan, 27 November 2012, doi:10.1057/9780230226203.2244
Stiglitz J (2002) Globalization and its discontents. Penguin, London
Suchanek A, Waldkirch R (2002) The task of business ethics. Katholische Universität Eichstätt, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt
Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad Manag Rev 34(4):689–709
Vogel D (2005) The market for virtue. The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press, Washington
Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New York
World Bank (2012) Turn down the heat. Why a 4 °C warmer world must be avoided. In: A report for the World Bank by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Climate Analytics, November 2012. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Söllner, A. Globalization, greed, and exploitation. How to break the baleful path?. J Bus Econ 84, 1211–1235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0742-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0742-4