Skip to main content
Log in

Coordination of supply chain investments and the advantage of revenue sharing

  • Forschung
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As examples of the practice show, revenue-sharing agreements between independent companies are arranged to coordinate a supply chain. Using an incomplete contracting model this article identifies conditions under which revenue-sharing agreements as well as pricing agreements are favorable for the involved companies. The main results show that revenue sharing increases the investment tendency of the upstream company to make revenue affecting specific investments and, under certain circumstances, increases the expected profit of both companies. Therefore, revenue sharing should be used if the success of the supply chain depends on a supply chain-crossing differentiation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P et al (1994) Renegotiation design with unverifiable information. Econometrica 62(2):257–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal D, Lal R (1995) Contractual arrangements in franchising. An empirical investigation. J Mark Res 32(2):213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldenius T (2000) Intrafirm trade, bargaining power, and specific investments. Rev Account Stud 5(1):27–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldenius T, Reichelstein S (1998) Alternative Verfahren zur Bestimmung innerbetrieblicher Verrechnungspreise. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtschaft Forsch 50(3):236–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldenius T et al (1999) Negotiated versus cost-based transfer pricing. Rev Account Stud 4(2):67–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya S, Lafontaine F (1995) Double-sided moral hazard and the nature of share contracts. RAND J Econ 26(4):761–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böckem S, Schiller U (2004) Transfer pricing and hold-ups in supply chains. Ger Econ Rev 5(2):211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley I, Price C (1988) The economic regulation of private industries by price constraints. J Ind Econ 37(1):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. In: de Kok AG, Graves SC (eds) Supply chain management. Design, coordination and operation. Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 229–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2005) Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts. Strengths and limitations. Manage Sci 51(1):30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che Y-K, Chung T-Y (1999) Contract damages and cooperative investments. RAND J Econ 30(1):84–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che Y-K, Hausch DB (1999) Cooperative investments and the value of contracting. Am Econ Rev 89(1):125–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu Y-H, Hu J-L (2003) Payment types and number of franchisees. Ser Ind J 23(4):42–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu W, Desai PS (1995) Channel coordination mechanisms for customer satisfaction. Mark Sci 14(4):343–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung T-Y (1991) Incomplete contracts, specific investments, and risk sharing. Rev Econ Stud 58(197):1031–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwolka A, Simons D (2003) Impacts of revenue sharing, profit sharing and transfer pricing on quality-improving investments. Eur Account Rev 12(1):47–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen I, Lachman R (1988) The generality of the strategic contingencies approach to sub-unit power. Organ Stud 9(3):371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling K, Cubbin J (1971) Price, quality and advertising competition. An econometric investigation of the United Kingdom car market. Economica 38(152):378–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana JD, Spier KE (2001) Revenue sharing and vertical control in the video rental industry. J Ind Econ 59(3):223–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlin A, Reichelstein S (1995) Specific investment under negotiated transfer pricing. An efficiency result. Account Rev 70(2):275–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM (1962). Power-dependence relations. Am Sociol Rev 27(1):32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM (1972a) Exchange theory, Part I. A psychological basis for social exchange. In: Berger J, Zelditch M, Anderson B (eds) Sociological theories in progress. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 38–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM (1972b) Exchange theory, Part II. Exchange relations and network structures. In: Berger J, Zelditch M, Anderson B (eds) Sociological theories in progress. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 58–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM (1976). Social exchange theory. Ann Rev Sociol 2(1):335–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French JRP, Raven BH (1959) The bases of social power. In: Cartwright D (ed) Studies in social power. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 150–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak Y, Wang Y (2004) Revenue-sharing vs. wholesale-price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Product Oper Manag 13(1):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannoccaro I, Pontrandolfo P (2004) Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. Int J Product Econ 89(2):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A et al (1984) A comparison of market share models and estimation procedures. J Mark Res 21(2):202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership. A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J Polit Econ 94(4):691–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart OD (1988) Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm. J Law Econ Organ 4(1):119–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart OD (1995) Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart OD, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J Polit Econ 98(6):1119–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickson DJ et al (1971) A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Admin Sci Q 16(2):216–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinings CR et al (1974) Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Admin Sci Q 19(1):22–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1956) On the economics of transfer pricing. J Bus 29(3):172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1957) Economics of the divisionalized firm. J Bus 30(1):96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1964) Internal pricing and decentralized decisions. In: Bonini CP, Jaedicke RK, Wagner HM (eds) Management controls. New directions in basic research. McGraw-Hill, New York, 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden S (1999) Renegotiation and the efficiency of investments. RAND J Econ 30(1):106–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NB (2006) Divisional performance measurement and transfer pricing for intangible assets. Rev Account Stud 11(2 – 3):339–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43(3):513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1990) Improving channel coordination through franchising. Market Sci 9(4):299–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengsfeld S (2006) Anreizwirkungen kostenbasierter Verrechnungspreise und die Vergabe von Verfügungsrechten für Investitionen. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtschaft Forsch 58(6):477–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo S, Çakanyildirim M (2005) Pricing and Production Games under Revenue Sharing and Information Updates. J Rev Pricing Manag 4(3):270–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod WB, Malcomson JM (1993) Investments, holdup and the form of market contracts. Am Econ Rev 83(4):811–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini JT (2007) Verrechnungspreise zur Koordination und Erfolgsermittlung. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta M (2004) Competition policy. Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JF (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21(1):128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nöldeke G, Schmidt KM (1995) Option contracts and renegotiation. A solution to the hold-up problem. RAND J Econ 26(2):163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nöldeke G, Schmidt KM (1998) Sequential investments and options to own. RAND J Econ 29(4):633–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack BA (2001) The capacitated newsboy problem with revenue sharing. J App Math Decision Sci 5(1):21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackford, Oxford

  • Petruzzi NC, Dada M (1999) Pricing and the newsvendor problem. A review with extensions. Operat Res 47(2):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer T (2002) Kostenbasierte oder verhandlungsorientierte Verrechnungspreise? Weiterführende Überlegungen zur Leistungsfähigkeit der Verfahren. Z Betriebswirtschaft 72(12):1269–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer T (2003) Corporate-Governance-Strukturen interner Märkte. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Porter ME (2004) Competitive strategy. Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan RG, Zingales L (1998) Power in a theory of the firm. Q J Econ 113(2):387–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan RG, Zingales L (2001) The firm as a dedicated hierarchy. A theory of the origins and growth of firms. Q J Econ 116(3):805–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson WP (1992) Contractual solutions to the hold-up problem. Rev Econ Stud 59(201):777–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahay S (2003) Transfer pricing based on actual cost. J Manag Account Res 15(1):177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders CS, Scamell RF (1982) Intraorganizational distributions of power. Replication research. Acad Manag J 25(1):192–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1975) Reexamination of the perfect concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Int J Game Theory 4(1):25–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1992) Preismanagement. Analyse, Strategie, Umsetzung. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler JJ (1950) Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J Polit Econ 58(4):347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis GJ (1988) The price elasticity of selective demand. A meta-analysis of econometric models of sale. J Mark Res 25(4):331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telser LG (1962) The demand for branded goods as estimated from consumer panel data. Rev Econ Stat 44(3):300–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y et al (2004) Channel performance under consignment contract with revenue sharing. Manag Sci 50(1):34–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wielenberg S (2000) Negotiated transfer pricing, specific investment, and optimal capacity choice. Rev Account Stud 5(3):197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Lohmann MBR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lohmann, C. Coordination of supply chain investments and the advantage of revenue sharing. Z Betriebswirtsch 80, 969–990 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-010-0388-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-010-0388-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation