Abstract
The present investigation was done to understand the fungal-fungal interactions mechanisms based on level of nonspecific adhesion of a potential fungal mycoparasite (Trichoderma) to their fungal host (Macrophomina phaseolina). The relative cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) and cell surface electrostatic charge (CSEC) of 29 isolates of Trichoderma species, analyzed by bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbon (BATH), hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), microelectrophoresis and contact angle, revealed a large degree of variability. CSH and CSEC of conidia depended on culture age, pH and temperature. Maximum CSH and CSEC were recorded in 25–28 °C range, and both declined significantly with increasing temperature. Isolate Trichoderma hazianum (Th)-23/98 expressed surface hydrophobicity at 25–28 °C and hydrophilicity at 40 °C. Surface hydrophobicity of the isolate was susceptible to various proteases (trypsin, pepsin, proteinase k and a-chymotrypsin) and inhibitors (SDS, mercaptoethanol and Triton X-100) and a significant reduction in CSH was recorded in hydrophobic conidia. Hydrophilic conidia remained more or less unaffected by such treatments. SDS-PAGE analysis of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic conidia exhibited several protein bands in the 25 to 61 kDa range. However, each protein population contained one protein that was not observed in the other population. For hydrophobic conidia, the unique protein had an apparent molecular mass of 49 kDa, while the unique protein associated with hydrophilic conidia had a molecular mass of 61 kDa. Our findings suggest that CSH and CSEC of mycoparasitic Trichoderma may contribute to non-specific adhesion on to the sclerotial surfaces of Macrophomina phaseolina that may be influenced by growth and environmental conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apoga D, Jansson HB, Tunlid A (2001) Adhesion of conidia and germlings of the plant pathogenic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana to solid surfaces. — Mycological Research 105: 1251–1260.
Bidochka MJ, St Leger, Joshi RJ, Roberts DW (1995) The rodlet layer from aerial and submerged conidia of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana contains hydrophobin. — Mycological Research 99: 403–406.
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. — Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248–254.
De Vries OHM, Fekkes MP, Wosten HAB, Wessels JGH (1993) Insoluble hydrophobin complexes in the walls of Schizophyllum commune and other filamentous fungi. — Archives of Microbiology 159: 330–335.
Donlon B, Colleran E (1993) A comparison of different methods to determine the hydrophobicity of acetogenic bacteria. — Journal of Microbial Methods 17: 27–37.
Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (1990) Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity: history measurement and significance. In Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (eds) Microbial Cell surface Hydrophobicity, pp. 1–37. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC.
Elad Y (1995) Mycoparasitism. In Kohmoto K, Singh US, Singh RP (eds) Pathogenesis and Host Specificity in Plant Diseases: Histopathological Biochemical Genetic and Molecular Basis, Volume II. Eukaryotes, pp. 289–307. Pergamon Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, U.K.
Gannon JT, Manilal VB, Alexander M (1991) Relationship between cell surface properties and transport of bacteria through soil. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 57: 190–193.
Hazen KC, Glee PM (1994) Hydrophobic cell wall protein glycosylation by the pathogenic fungicides Candida albicans. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 40: 266–272.
Hazen KC, Glee PM (1995) Cell surface hydrophobicity and medically important fungi. — Current topics in Medical Mycology 6: 1–37.
Hazen KC, Hazen BW (1992) Hydrophobic surface protein masking by the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans. — Infection and Immunity 60: 1499–1508.
Hazen KC, Lay JG, Hazen BW, Fu RC, Murthy S (1990) Partial biochemical characterization of cell surface hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of Candida albicans. — Infection and Immunity 58: 3469–3476.
Hazen KC, Plotkin BJ, Klimas DM (1986) Influence of growth condition on cell surface hydrophobicity of Candida albicans and Candida glabarata. — Infection and Immunity 54: 269–271.
Hazen KC (1990) Cell surface hydrophobicity of medically important fungi especially Candida species. In Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (eds) Microbial Cell Surface Hydrophobicity, pp. 249–295. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC.
Hazen KC, Wu JG, Masuoka J (2001) Comparison of the hydrophobic properties of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis. — Infection and Immunity 69: 779–786.
Herrera-Estrella A, Chet I (2002) The biological control agent Trichoderma from fundamentals to applications. In Arora DK, Bridge PD, Bhatnagar D (eds) Fungal Biotechnology, pp. 2. Marcel Dekker, U.S.A (in press).
Inbar J, Chet I (1994) A newly isolated lectin from the plant pathogenic fungus Sclerotium rolfsii: purification characterization and role in mycoparasitism. — Microbiology 140: 651–657.
Inbar J, Chet I (1997) Lectins and Biocontrol. — Critical Review in Biotechonology 17: 1–20.
James AM (1991) Charge properties of microbial cell surfaces. In Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial Cell Surface Analysis: Structural and Physiochemical Methods, pp. 221–262. VCH Publishers, New York.
Jeffs LB, Khachatourians GG (1997) Estimation of spore hydrophobicity for members of the genera Beauveria, Metarhizium and Tolypocladium by salt-mediated aggregation and sedimentation. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 43: 23–28.
Jeffs LB, Xavier IJ, Mattai RE & Khachatourians GG (1999) Relationships between fungal spore morphologies and surface properties for entomorphogenic members of the genera Beauveria, Metarhizium, Tolypocladium and Verticillium. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 45: 936–948.
Jones L, O’Shea P (1994) The electrostatic nature of the cell surface of Candida albicans: a role in adhesion. — Experimental Mycology 18: 111–120.
Jones L, Hobden C, O’Shea P (1995) Use of real-time fluorescent probe to study the electrostatic properties of the cell surface of Candida albicans. — Mycological Research 99: 969–976.
Kennedy MJ, Sandin RL (1988) Influence of growth condition on Candida albicans adhesion hydrophobicity and cell wall ultrastructure. — Journal of Medical Veterinary Mycology 26: 79–92.
Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. — Nature 227: 680–685.
Marshall KC (1991) The importance of studying microbial cell surfaces. In Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial Cell Surface Analysis, pp. 3–19. VCH Publisher, New York.
Martz C, Jurgens K (2001) Effects of hydrphobic and electrostatic cell surface properties of bacteria on feeding rates of hetertrophic nanoflagellates. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67: 814–820.
Mihail JD, Taylor SD (1995) Interpreting variability among isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina in pathogenicity pycnidium production and chlorate utilization. — Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 1596–1603.
Neu TR (1996) Significance of bacterial surface-active compounds in interaction of bacteria with interfaces. — Microbiological Review 60: 151–166.
Rentschler J (1971) Die Wasserbenetzbarkeit von Blattoberflächen und ihre submikroskopische Wachsstruktur. — Plants 96: 119–135.
Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E (1980) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons a simple method for measuring cell surface hydrophobicity. — FEMS Microbiology Letters 9: 29–33.
Schafer A, Ustohl P, Harms H, Stauffer F, Dracos T, Zehnder AJB (1998) Transport of bacteria in unsaturated porus media. — Journal of Contaminating Hydrology 33: 149–169.
Silva TMJ, Glee PM, Hazen KC (1995) Influence of cell surface hydrophobicity on attachment of Candida albicans to extracellular matrix proteins. — Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology 33: 117–122.
Singh T (2002) Specific and non-specific mechanisms of recognition between Trichoderma and Macrophomina phaseolina interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Banaras Hindu University, India.
Smith SN, Chohan RA, Armstrong RA, Whipps JM (1998) Hydrophobicity and surface charge of conidia of the mycoparasite Coniothyriums minitans. — Mycological Research 102: 243–249.
Smith SN, Armstrong RA, Barker M, Bird RA, Chohan R, Hartell NA, Whipps JM (1999) Determination of Coniothyrium minitans conidial and germling lectin avidity by flow cytometry and digital microscopy. — Mycological Research 103: 1533–1539.
Srivastava AK, Gupta S, Arora DK (1996) Agglutination response of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma harzianum to Macrophomona phaseolina under different growth conditions. — Microbiological Research 151: 193–200.
Tronchin G, Bouchara JP, Ferron M, Larcher G, Chabasse D (1995) Cell surface properties of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia: correlation between adherence agglutination and rearrangements of the cell wall. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41: 714–721.
Van der Mei HC, Rosenberg M, Busscher H (1991) Assessment of microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. In Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial Cell Surface Analysis, pp. 263–287. VCH Publisher, New York.
Wessels JGH (1997) Hydrophobins: Proteins that change the nature of the fungal surface. — Advance Microbiology and Physiology 38: 1–45.
Wessels JGH (1999) Fungi in their own right. — Fungal Genetics and Biology 27: 134–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, T., Saikia, R., Jana, T. et al. Hydrophobicity and surface electrostatic charge of conidia of the mycoparasitic Trichoderma species. Mycol Progress 3, 219–228 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0092-x
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0092-x