Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrophobicity and surface electrostatic charge of conidia of the mycoparasitic Trichoderma species

  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present investigation was done to understand the fungal-fungal interactions mechanisms based on level of nonspecific adhesion of a potential fungal mycoparasite (Trichoderma) to their fungal host (Macrophomina phaseolina). The relative cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) and cell surface electrostatic charge (CSEC) of 29 isolates of Trichoderma species, analyzed by bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbon (BATH), hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), microelectrophoresis and contact angle, revealed a large degree of variability. CSH and CSEC of conidia depended on culture age, pH and temperature. Maximum CSH and CSEC were recorded in 25–28 °C range, and both declined significantly with increasing temperature. Isolate Trichoderma hazianum (Th)-23/98 expressed surface hydrophobicity at 25–28 °C and hydrophilicity at 40 °C. Surface hydrophobicity of the isolate was susceptible to various proteases (trypsin, pepsin, proteinase k and a-chymotrypsin) and inhibitors (SDS, mercaptoethanol and Triton X-100) and a significant reduction in CSH was recorded in hydrophobic conidia. Hydrophilic conidia remained more or less unaffected by such treatments. SDS-PAGE analysis of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic conidia exhibited several protein bands in the 25 to 61 kDa range. However, each protein population contained one protein that was not observed in the other population. For hydrophobic conidia, the unique protein had an apparent molecular mass of 49 kDa, while the unique protein associated with hydrophilic conidia had a molecular mass of 61 kDa. Our findings suggest that CSH and CSEC of mycoparasitic Trichoderma may contribute to non-specific adhesion on to the sclerotial surfaces of Macrophomina phaseolina that may be influenced by growth and environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apoga D, Jansson HB, Tunlid A (2001) Adhesion of conidia and germlings of the plant pathogenic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana to solid surfaces. — Mycological Research 105: 1251–1260.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bidochka MJ, St Leger, Joshi RJ, Roberts DW (1995) The rodlet layer from aerial and submerged conidia of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana contains hydrophobin. — Mycological Research 99: 403–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. — Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248–254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries OHM, Fekkes MP, Wosten HAB, Wessels JGH (1993) Insoluble hydrophobin complexes in the walls of Schizophyllum commune and other filamentous fungi. — Archives of Microbiology 159: 330–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donlon B, Colleran E (1993) A comparison of different methods to determine the hydrophobicity of acetogenic bacteria. — Journal of Microbial Methods 17: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (1990) Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity: history measurement and significance. In Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (eds) Microbial Cell surface Hydrophobicity, pp. 1–37. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elad Y (1995) Mycoparasitism. In Kohmoto K, Singh US, Singh RP (eds) Pathogenesis and Host Specificity in Plant Diseases: Histopathological Biochemical Genetic and Molecular Basis, Volume II. Eukaryotes, pp. 289–307. Pergamon Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon JT, Manilal VB, Alexander M (1991) Relationship between cell surface properties and transport of bacteria through soil. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 57: 190–193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen KC, Glee PM (1994) Hydrophobic cell wall protein glycosylation by the pathogenic fungicides Candida albicans. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 40: 266–272.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen KC, Glee PM (1995) Cell surface hydrophobicity and medically important fungi. — Current topics in Medical Mycology 6: 1–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen KC, Hazen BW (1992) Hydrophobic surface protein masking by the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans. — Infection and Immunity 60: 1499–1508.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen KC, Lay JG, Hazen BW, Fu RC, Murthy S (1990) Partial biochemical characterization of cell surface hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of Candida albicans. — Infection and Immunity 58: 3469–3476.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen KC, Plotkin BJ, Klimas DM (1986) Influence of growth condition on cell surface hydrophobicity of Candida albicans and Candida glabarata. — Infection and Immunity 54: 269–271.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen KC (1990) Cell surface hydrophobicity of medically important fungi especially Candida species. In Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (eds) Microbial Cell Surface Hydrophobicity, pp. 249–295. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen KC, Wu JG, Masuoka J (2001) Comparison of the hydrophobic properties of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis. — Infection and Immunity 69: 779–786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Estrella A, Chet I (2002) The biological control agent Trichoderma from fundamentals to applications. In Arora DK, Bridge PD, Bhatnagar D (eds) Fungal Biotechnology, pp. 2. Marcel Dekker, U.S.A (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar J, Chet I (1994) A newly isolated lectin from the plant pathogenic fungus Sclerotium rolfsii: purification characterization and role in mycoparasitism. — Microbiology 140: 651–657.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar J, Chet I (1997) Lectins and Biocontrol. — Critical Review in Biotechonology 17: 1–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James AM (1991) Charge properties of microbial cell surfaces. In Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial Cell Surface Analysis: Structural and Physiochemical Methods, pp. 221–262. VCH Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffs LB, Khachatourians GG (1997) Estimation of spore hydrophobicity for members of the genera Beauveria, Metarhizium and Tolypocladium by salt-mediated aggregation and sedimentation. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 43: 23–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffs LB, Xavier IJ, Mattai RE & Khachatourians GG (1999) Relationships between fungal spore morphologies and surface properties for entomorphogenic members of the genera Beauveria, Metarhizium, Tolypocladium and Verticillium. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 45: 936–948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, O’Shea P (1994) The electrostatic nature of the cell surface of Candida albicans: a role in adhesion. — Experimental Mycology 18: 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, Hobden C, O’Shea P (1995) Use of real-time fluorescent probe to study the electrostatic properties of the cell surface of Candida albicans. — Mycological Research 99: 969–976.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy MJ, Sandin RL (1988) Influence of growth condition on Candida albicans adhesion hydrophobicity and cell wall ultrastructure. — Journal of Medical Veterinary Mycology 26: 79–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. — Nature 227: 680–685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall KC (1991) The importance of studying microbial cell surfaces. In Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial Cell Surface Analysis, pp. 3–19. VCH Publisher, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martz C, Jurgens K (2001) Effects of hydrphobic and electrostatic cell surface properties of bacteria on feeding rates of hetertrophic nanoflagellates. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67: 814–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihail JD, Taylor SD (1995) Interpreting variability among isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina in pathogenicity pycnidium production and chlorate utilization. — Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 1596–1603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu TR (1996) Significance of bacterial surface-active compounds in interaction of bacteria with interfaces. — Microbiological Review 60: 151–166.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rentschler J (1971) Die Wasserbenetzbarkeit von Blattoberflächen und ihre submikroskopische Wachsstruktur. — Plants 96: 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E (1980) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons a simple method for measuring cell surface hydrophobicity. — FEMS Microbiology Letters 9: 29–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer A, Ustohl P, Harms H, Stauffer F, Dracos T, Zehnder AJB (1998) Transport of bacteria in unsaturated porus media. — Journal of Contaminating Hydrology 33: 149–169.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva TMJ, Glee PM, Hazen KC (1995) Influence of cell surface hydrophobicity on attachment of Candida albicans to extracellular matrix proteins. — Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology 33: 117–122.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh T (2002) Specific and non-specific mechanisms of recognition between Trichoderma and Macrophomina phaseolina interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Banaras Hindu University, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SN, Chohan RA, Armstrong RA, Whipps JM (1998) Hydrophobicity and surface charge of conidia of the mycoparasite Coniothyriums minitans. — Mycological Research 102: 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SN, Armstrong RA, Barker M, Bird RA, Chohan R, Hartell NA, Whipps JM (1999) Determination of Coniothyrium minitans conidial and germling lectin avidity by flow cytometry and digital microscopy. — Mycological Research 103: 1533–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava AK, Gupta S, Arora DK (1996) Agglutination response of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma harzianum to Macrophomona phaseolina under different growth conditions. — Microbiological Research 151: 193–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tronchin G, Bouchara JP, Ferron M, Larcher G, Chabasse D (1995) Cell surface properties of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia: correlation between adherence agglutination and rearrangements of the cell wall. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41: 714–721.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Mei HC, Rosenberg M, Busscher H (1991) Assessment of microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. In Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial Cell Surface Analysis, pp. 263–287. VCH Publisher, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels JGH (1997) Hydrophobins: Proteins that change the nature of the fungal surface. — Advance Microbiology and Physiology 38: 1–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels JGH (1999) Fungi in their own right. — Fungal Genetics and Biology 27: 134–145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilip K. Arora.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, T., Saikia, R., Jana, T. et al. Hydrophobicity and surface electrostatic charge of conidia of the mycoparasitic Trichoderma species. Mycol Progress 3, 219–228 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0092-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0092-x

Keywords

Navigation