Abstract
Background
The short-term outcomes of pediatric digit replantation have been derived primarily from single-center/surgeon experience. The purpose of this study was to conduct a nationwide analysis of outcomes and trends of pediatric digit replantation as compared to adult patients.
Methods
Digit replantation patients were identified in the 1999–2011 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Outcomes included in-hospital procedure-related and total complications, microvascular revision, amputation, and length of stay (LOS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare pediatric and adult patients and to identify independent predictors of outcomes. The annual rate of replantation among pediatric digit amputation patients was evaluated over the study period.
Results
A total of 3,010 patients who underwent digit replantation were identified, including 455 pediatric patients. For all replantations, age ≤18 years was associated with a lower likelihood of suffering a total complication (odds ratio (OR) 0.66, P = 0.006), requiring amputation (OR 0.62, P < 0.001), and experiencing LOS >5 days (OR 0.77, P = 0.019), after adjusting for comorbidity, amputation severity, digit type, number of replantations, and hospital characteristics. Similar associations were observed between patient age and replantation outcomes for single-finger replantations. The rate of pediatric replantation (range 16 to 27 %) remained consistent through the study period (incidence rate ratio 0.98, P = 0.06).
Conclusions
The rate of pediatric replantation has been relatively low, being 27 % at most in a given year. Importantly, short-term outcomes are better in children than for adults, supporting the indication to perform replantation in this age group when the surgeon feels that replantation is feasible and safe.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker GL, Kleinert JM. Digit replantation in infants and young children: determinants of survival. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(1):139–45.
Buncke GM, Buntic RF, Romeo O. Pediatric mutilating hand injuries. Hand Clin. 2003;19(1):121–31.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KA, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Diseases. 1987;40(5):373–83.
Chen MW, Narayan D. Economics of upper extremity replantation: national and local trends. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):2003–11.
Cheng GL, Pan DD, Yang ZX, et al. Digital replantation in children. Ann Plast Surg. 1985;15(4):325–31.
Chung KC, Kowalski CP, Walters MR. Finger replantation in the United States: rates and resource use from the 1996 healthcare cost and utilization project. J Hand Surg. 2000;25(6):1038–42.
Dec W. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Tech Hand Upper Extrem Surg. 2006;10(3):124–9.
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.
Friedrich JB, Poppler LH, Mack CD, et al. Epidemiology of upper extremity replantation surgery in the United States. J Hand Surg. 2011;36(11):1835–40.
Grob M, Papadopulos NA, Zimmermann A, et al. The psychological impact of severe hand injury. J Hand Surg: Eur. 2008;33(3):358–62.
Guo LC, Da DP, Nin PZ, et al. Digital replantation in children: a long-term follow-up study. J Hand Surg. 1998;23(4):635–46.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project [Internet]. Overview of the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/overview.jsp.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project [Internet]. Overview of the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/discwt/nisnote.jsp.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project [internet]. Overview of the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. Available from: http://www.hcupus.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_teach/nisnote.jsp.
Holt DR, Kirk SJ, Regan MC, et al. Effect of age on wound healing in healthy human beings. Surgery. 1992;112(2):293–8.
Ikeda K, Yamauchi S, Hashimoto F, et al. Digital replantation in children: a long-term follow-up study. Microsurgery. 1990;11(4):261–4.
Jaeger SH, Tsai T-M, Kleinert HE. Upper extremity replantation in children. Orthop Clin North Am. 1981;12(4):897–907.
Kim JYS, Brown RJ, Jones NF. Pediatric upper extremity replantation. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32(1):1–10.
Meyer TM. Psychological aspects of mutilating hand injuries. Hand Clin. 2003;19(1):41–9.
Michalko KB, Bentz ML. Digital replantation in children. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(11):S444–7.
Mohan R, Panthaki Z, Armstrong MB. Replantation in the pediatric hand. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(4):996–8.
Netscher N, Murphy K, Fiore N. Hand surgery. Townsend: Sabiston textbook of surgery. 19th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012. 1972.
Payatakes AH, Zagoreos NP, Fedorcik GG, et al. Current practice of microsurgery by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Hand Surg. 2007;32(4):541–7.
Phillips TJ. Aging and wound healing. Wounds. 1999;11(4):2D–6D.
Richards WT, Barber MK, Richards WA, et al. Hand injuries in the state of Florida, are centers of excellence needed? Journal of Trauma—Injury. Infect Crit Care. 2010;68(6):1480–90.
Saies AD, Urbaniak JR, Nunley JA, et al. Results after replantation and revascularization in the upper extremity in children. J Bone Joint Surg—Series A. 1994;76(12):1766–76.
Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(3):723–37.
Shale CM, Tidwell III JE, Mulligan RP, et al. A nationwide review of the treatment patterns of traumatic thumb amputations. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(6):647–51.
Sharma S, Lin S, Panozzo A, et al. Thumb replantation: a retrospective review of 103 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(4):352–6.
Shenaq SM, Kattash M. Pediatric microsurgery. In: Bentz ML, editor. Pediatric plastic surgery. Stamford: Appleton and Lange; 1998. p. 99–826.
Soucacos PN. Indications and selection for digital amputation and replantation. J Hand Surg. 2001;26(6):572–81.
Squitieri L, Reichert H, Kim HM, et al. Patterns of surgical care and health disparities of treating pediatric finger amputation injuries in the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(4):475–85.
Taras JS, Nunley JA, Urbaniak JR, et al. Replantation in children. Microsurgery. 1991;12(3):216–20.
Urbaniak J. Replantation in children. Pediatric plastic surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 1984:1168-1185.
Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, et al. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury. 2000;31(1):33–40.
Conflict of Interest
Nicholas L. Berlin declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Charles T. Tuggle declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
James G. Thomson declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Alexander Au declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).
Statement of Informed Consent
This study was deemed exempt from Institutional Review Board approval by our University Human Investigation Committee, as only publicly available, de-identified information was examined. No informed consent for this study was obtained given the nature of the data. HIC Protocol # 1401013202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Berlin, N.L., Tuggle, C.T., Thomson, J.G. et al. Digit replantation in children: a nationwide analysis of outcomes and trends of 455 pediatric patients. HAND 9, 244–252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9628-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9628-8