Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Digit replantation in children: a nationwide analysis of outcomes and trends of 455 pediatric patients

  • Surgery Articles
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

The short-term outcomes of pediatric digit replantation have been derived primarily from single-center/surgeon experience. The purpose of this study was to conduct a nationwide analysis of outcomes and trends of pediatric digit replantation as compared to adult patients.

Methods

Digit replantation patients were identified in the 1999–2011 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Outcomes included in-hospital procedure-related and total complications, microvascular revision, amputation, and length of stay (LOS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare pediatric and adult patients and to identify independent predictors of outcomes. The annual rate of replantation among pediatric digit amputation patients was evaluated over the study period.

Results

A total of 3,010 patients who underwent digit replantation were identified, including 455 pediatric patients. For all replantations, age ≤18 years was associated with a lower likelihood of suffering a total complication (odds ratio (OR) 0.66, P = 0.006), requiring amputation (OR 0.62, P < 0.001), and experiencing LOS >5 days (OR 0.77, P = 0.019), after adjusting for comorbidity, amputation severity, digit type, number of replantations, and hospital characteristics. Similar associations were observed between patient age and replantation outcomes for single-finger replantations. The rate of pediatric replantation (range 16 to 27 %) remained consistent through the study period (incidence rate ratio 0.98, P = 0.06).

Conclusions

The rate of pediatric replantation has been relatively low, being 27 % at most in a given year. Importantly, short-term outcomes are better in children than for adults, supporting the indication to perform replantation in this age group when the surgeon feels that replantation is feasible and safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker GL, Kleinert JM. Digit replantation in infants and young children: determinants of survival. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(1):139–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buncke GM, Buntic RF, Romeo O. Pediatric mutilating hand injuries. Hand Clin. 2003;19(1):121–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KA, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Diseases. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen MW, Narayan D. Economics of upper extremity replantation: national and local trends. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):2003–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng GL, Pan DD, Yang ZX, et al. Digital replantation in children. Ann Plast Surg. 1985;15(4):325–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung KC, Kowalski CP, Walters MR. Finger replantation in the United States: rates and resource use from the 1996 healthcare cost and utilization project. J Hand Surg. 2000;25(6):1038–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dec W. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Tech Hand Upper Extrem Surg. 2006;10(3):124–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedrich JB, Poppler LH, Mack CD, et al. Epidemiology of upper extremity replantation surgery in the United States. J Hand Surg. 2011;36(11):1835–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grob M, Papadopulos NA, Zimmermann A, et al. The psychological impact of severe hand injury. J Hand Surg: Eur. 2008;33(3):358–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo LC, Da DP, Nin PZ, et al. Digital replantation in children: a long-term follow-up study. J Hand Surg. 1998;23(4):635–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project [Internet]. Overview of the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/overview.jsp.

  13. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project [Internet]. Overview of the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/discwt/nisnote.jsp.

  14. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project [internet]. Overview of the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. Available from: http://www.hcupus.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_teach/nisnote.jsp.

  15. Holt DR, Kirk SJ, Regan MC, et al. Effect of age on wound healing in healthy human beings. Surgery. 1992;112(2):293–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ikeda K, Yamauchi S, Hashimoto F, et al. Digital replantation in children: a long-term follow-up study. Microsurgery. 1990;11(4):261–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaeger SH, Tsai T-M, Kleinert HE. Upper extremity replantation in children. Orthop Clin North Am. 1981;12(4):897–907.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JYS, Brown RJ, Jones NF. Pediatric upper extremity replantation. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer TM. Psychological aspects of mutilating hand injuries. Hand Clin. 2003;19(1):41–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Michalko KB, Bentz ML. Digital replantation in children. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(11):S444–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohan R, Panthaki Z, Armstrong MB. Replantation in the pediatric hand. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(4):996–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Netscher N, Murphy K, Fiore N. Hand surgery. Townsend: Sabiston textbook of surgery. 19th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Payatakes AH, Zagoreos NP, Fedorcik GG, et al. Current practice of microsurgery by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Hand Surg. 2007;32(4):541–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Phillips TJ. Aging and wound healing. Wounds. 1999;11(4):2D–6D.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richards WT, Barber MK, Richards WA, et al. Hand injuries in the state of Florida, are centers of excellence needed? Journal of Trauma—Injury. Infect Crit Care. 2010;68(6):1480–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saies AD, Urbaniak JR, Nunley JA, et al. Results after replantation and revascularization in the upper extremity in children. J Bone Joint Surg—Series A. 1994;76(12):1766–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(3):723–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shale CM, Tidwell III JE, Mulligan RP, et al. A nationwide review of the treatment patterns of traumatic thumb amputations. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(6):647–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma S, Lin S, Panozzo A, et al. Thumb replantation: a retrospective review of 103 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(4):352–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shenaq SM, Kattash M. Pediatric microsurgery. In: Bentz ML, editor. Pediatric plastic surgery. Stamford: Appleton and Lange; 1998. p. 99–826.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Soucacos PN. Indications and selection for digital amputation and replantation. J Hand Surg. 2001;26(6):572–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Squitieri L, Reichert H, Kim HM, et al. Patterns of surgical care and health disparities of treating pediatric finger amputation injuries in the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(4):475–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Taras JS, Nunley JA, Urbaniak JR, et al. Replantation in children. Microsurgery. 1991;12(3):216–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Urbaniak J. Replantation in children. Pediatric plastic surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 1984:1168-1185.

  35. Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, et al. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury. 2000;31(1):33–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Nicholas L. Berlin declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Charles T. Tuggle declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

James G. Thomson declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Alexander Au declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Statement of Informed Consent

This study was deemed exempt from Institutional Review Board approval by our University Human Investigation Committee, as only publicly available, de-identified information was examined. No informed consent for this study was obtained given the nature of the data. HIC Protocol # 1401013202.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Au.

About this article

Cite this article

Berlin, N.L., Tuggle, C.T., Thomson, J.G. et al. Digit replantation in children: a nationwide analysis of outcomes and trends of 455 pediatric patients. HAND 9, 244–252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9628-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9628-8

Keywords

Navigation