Skip to main content
Log in

Computed tomography for suspected scaphoid fractures: comparison of reformations in the plane of the wrist versus the long axis of the scaphoid

  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

Definitive diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures remains difficult. We tested the null hypothesis that, for diagnosis of true fractures among suspected scaphoid fractures, computed tomography (CT) reformations along the long axis of the scaphoid have the same accuracy as reformations made relative to the anatomical planes of the wrist.

Methods

In a prospective trial, 34 patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture underwent CT scanning within 10 days after trauma. CT reformations along the long axis of the scaphoid (CT-scaphoid) and along planes relative to the wrist (CT-wrist) were made. We used radiographs obtained 6 weeks after injury as the reference standard for a true fracture. A blinded panel including two surgeons and one radiologist came to a consensus diagnosis for each reformation plane.

Results

The reference standard showed six fractures of the scaphoid (prevalence, 18 %). Using CT-wrist, a scaphoid fracture was diagnosed in five patients (15 %), with three false positive, four false negative and two true positive diagnoses. Using CT-scaphoid, a scaphoid fracture was diagnosed in five patients (15 %), with one false positive, two false negative and four true positive results. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 33, 89 and 79 % for CT-wrist and 67, 96 and 91 % for CT-scaphoid, respectively. This resulted in positive predictive values of 36 % for CT-wrist and 76 % for CT-scaphoid. Negative predictive values were 87 % for CT-wrist and 94 % for CT-scaphoid. No significant differences were found with the number of patients available.

Conclusions

For diagnosis of true fractures among suspected scaphoid fractures, the diagnostic performance characteristics of CT scans reformatted along the long axis of the scaphoid were better than CT scans in the planes of the wrist, but the differences were not significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adey L, Souer JS, Lozano-Calderon S, Palmer W, Lee SG, Ring D. Computed tomography of suspected scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:61–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ. 1994;309:102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bain GI, Bennett JD, Richards RS, Slethaug GP, Roth JH. Longitudinal computed tomography of the scaphoid: a new technique. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:271–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buijze GA, Mallee WH, Beeres FJ, Hanson TE, Johnson WO, Ring D. Diagnostic performance tests for suspected scaphoid fractures differ with conventional and latent class analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3400–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SC. The scaphoid compression test. J Hand Surg (Br). 1989;14:323–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jenkins PJ, Slade K, Huntley JS, Robinson CM. A comparative analysis of the accuracy, diagnostic uncertainty and cost of imaging modalities in suspected scaphoid fractures. Injury. 2008;39:768–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kocher MS, Zurakowski D. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: a primer for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:607–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lozano-Calderon S, Blazar P, Zurakowski D, Lee SG, Ring D. Diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement with radiography and computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2695–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mallee W, Doornberg JN, Ring D, van Dijk CN, Maas M, Goslings JC. Comparison of CT and MRI for diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:20–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Memarsadeghi M, Breitenseher MJ, Schaefer-Prokop C, et al. Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology. 2006;240:169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miettinen OS. The matched pairs design in the case of all-or-none responses. Biometrics. 1968;24:339–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Munk B, Frokjaer J, Larsen CF, et al. Diagnosis of scaphoid fractures. A prospective multicenter study of 1,052 patients with 160 fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:359–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Herndon JH. Acute fractures of the scaphoid. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:225–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ring D, Lozano-Calderon S. Imaging for suspected scaphoid fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:954–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders WE. Evaluation of the humpback scaphoid by computed tomography in the longitudinal axial plane of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Am. 1988;13:182–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart NR, Gilula LA. CT of the wrist: a tailored approach. Radiology. 1992;183:13–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Drs. SP Kamminga, resident in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, for his support to include several patients for this study and Mrs. WA van Enst of the Dutch Cochrane Center for her dedication in the statistical analysis.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Conflict of interest statement

There were no financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence this work. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wouter H. Mallee.

About this article

Cite this article

Mallee, W.H., Doornberg, J.N., Ring, D. et al. Computed tomography for suspected scaphoid fractures: comparison of reformations in the plane of the wrist versus the long axis of the scaphoid. HAND 9, 117–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9556-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9556-z

Keywords

Navigation