Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plating of metacarpal fractures with locked or nonlocked screws, a biomechanical study: how many cortices are really necessary?

  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

Dorsal plate and screw fixation is a popular choice for metacarpal stabilization. The balance between construct stability and soft tissue dissection remains a surgical dilemma. Historically, six cortices of bone fixation on either side of a fracture were deemed necessary. This study aims to elucidate whether four cortices of locked fixation on either side of the fracture is equivalent to the current gold standard of six cortices of nonlocked fixation on either side of the fracture. If so, less dissection to insert shorter plates with fewer screws could be used to stably fix these fractures.

Methods

With biomechanical testing-grade composite Sawbones, a comminuted metacarpal fracture model was used to test two fixation constructs consisting of a standard dorsal plate and either six bicortical nonlocking screws (three screws per segment) or four bicortical locking screws (two screws per segment). Thirty specimens were tested to failure in cantilever bending and torsion.

Results

There was statistical equivalence between the locking and nonlocking constructs in cantilever bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, maximum bending load, and maximum torque.

Conclusion

The tested metacarpal fracture model had equivalent biomechanical properties when fixed with a standard dorsal plate and either six bicortical nonlocking screws or four bicortical locking screws. By utilizing fewer cortices of fixation, there will be less dissection and less soft tissue stripping during fixation of metacarpal fractures. This will also be of benefit in very proximal or distal fractures as multiple cortices of fixation are often difficult to obtain during stabilization of these challenging fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bach HG, Gonzalez MH, Hall RF. Locked intramedullary nailing of metacarpal fractures secondary to gunshot wounds. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;31A(7):1083–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bottlang M, Doornink J, Fitzpatrick DC, et al. Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1985–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bottlang M, Doornink J, Lujan TJ, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL, Augat P, et al. Effects of construct stiffness on healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(2):12–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dona E, Gillies RM, Gianoutsos MP, et al. Plating of metacarpal fractures: unicortical or bicortical screws? J Hand Surg (Br). 2004;29(3):218–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dougherty PJ, Kim D, Meisterling S, et al. Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(6):399–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, et al. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):488–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fambrough RA, Green DP. Tendon rupture as a complication of screw fixation in fractures in the hand. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(5):781–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Firoozbakhsh KK, Moneim MS, Doherty W, et al. Internal fixation of oblique metacarpal fractures. A biomechanical evaluation by impact loading. Clin Orthop. 1996;325:296–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Firoozbakhsh KK, Moneim MS, Howey T, et al. Comparative fatigue strengths and stabilities of metacarpal internal fixation techniques. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1993;18(6):1059–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeland AE, Orbay JL. Extraarticular hand fractures in adults: a review of new developments. Clin Orthop. 2006;445:133–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gajendran VK, Szabo RM, Myo GK, et al. Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34(10):1851–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardner MJ, Nork SE, Huber P, Krieg JC. Stiffness modulation of locking plate constructs using near cortical slotted holes: a preliminary study. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:281–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury. 2003;34 Suppl 2:B63–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez MH, Igram CM, Hall Jr RF. Flexible intramedullary nailing for metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;20(3):382–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hak DJ, Althausen P, Hazelwood SJ. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough? J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(4):207–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris AH, Fernandes-Taylor S, Giori N. “Not statistically different” does not necessarily mean “the same”: the important but underappreciated distinction between difference and equivalence studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(5):e29 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lindvall EM, Sagi HC. Selective screw placement in forearm compression plating: results of 75 consecutive fractures stabilized with 4 cortices of screw fixation on either side of the fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(3):157–62. discussion 162–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mann RJ, Black D, Constine R, et al. A quantitative comparison of metacarpal fracture stability with five different methods of internal fixation. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1985;10(6 Pt 2):1024–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meunier MJ, Hentzen E, Ryan M, et al. Predicted effects of metacarpal shortening on interosseous muscle function. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2004;29(4):689–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ochman S, Doht S, Paletta J, et al. Comparison between locking and non-locking plates for fixation of metacarpal fractures in an animal model. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2010;35(4):597–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Opgrande JD, Westphal SA. Fractures of the hand. Orthop Clin North Am. 1983;14(4):779–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Orbay J. Intramedullary nailing of metacarpal shaft fractures. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2005;9(2):69–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prevel CD, Eppley BL, Jackson JR, et al. Mini and micro plating of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;20(1):44–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Prevel CD, McCarty M, Katona T, et al. Comparative biomechanical stability of titanium bone fixation systems in metacarpal fractures. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35(1):6–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Royle SG. Rotational deformity following metacarpal fracture. J Hand Surg (Br). 1990;15(1):124–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruchelsman DE, Mudgal CS, Jupiter JB. The role of locking technology in the hand. Hand Clin. 2010;26(3):307–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruedi TP, Murphy WM. AO principles of fracture management. New York: Thieme; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sohn RC, Jahng KH, Curtiss SB, et al. Comparison of metacarpal plating methods. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2008;33(3):316–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stern PJ, Wieser MJ, Reilly DG. Complications of plate fixation in the hand skeleton. Clin Orthop. 1987;214:59–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vanik RK, Weber RC, Matloub HS, et al. The comparative strengths of internal fixation techniques. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9(2):216–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Waris E, Ashammakhi N, Happonen H, et al. Bioabsorbable miniplating versus metallic fixation for metacarpal fractures. Clin Orthop. 2003;410:310–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Waris E, Ashammakhi N, Raatikainen T, et al. Self-reinforced bioabsorbable versus metallic fixation systems for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;27(5):902–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Alex HS Harris, PhD, for his assistance with the statistical design and analysis. We wish to thank Synthes for providing the plates and screws used in this study.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Statement of Informed Consent

There were no patients in this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest, commercial associations, or intent of financial gain regarding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA

    Cameron Barr, Anthony W Behn & Jeffrey Yao

  2. 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Redwood City, CA, 94063-6342, USA

    Jeffrey Yao

Authors
  1. Cameron Barr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony W Behn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Yao.

About this article

Cite this article

Barr, C., Behn, A.W. & Yao, J. Plating of metacarpal fractures with locked or nonlocked screws, a biomechanical study: how many cortices are really necessary?. HAND 8, 454–459 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9544-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9544-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation