Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic detection of compressing fascial bands around the ulnar nerve within the FCU

  • Surgery Articles
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to endoscopically evaluate the ulnar nerve proximal and distal to the cubital tunnel after in situ decompression to identify and eventually release fascial bands capable of compressing the ulnar nerve.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 16 ulnar nerve compression cases in 12 patients. Eight men and four women with a mean age of 52 years (range, 23–77 years) were clinically diagnosed and confirmed with neurophysiologic studies. A 4–6-cm curvilinear incision was made at the medial elbow, and the ulnar nerve was identified and decompressed at the cubital tunnel. Then, a 2.7-mm endoscope was passed 8 to 10 cm proximal and distal to the medial epicondyle allowing for visualization of the ulnar nerve and its surrounding soft tissues.

Results

The endoscopic evaluation of the 16 ulnar nerves demonstrated no compressive bands outside of the cubital tunnel. All patients had satisfactory outcomes.

Conclusions

The good results reported after in situ ulnar nerve decompression have questioned the need for endoscopically assisted decompression of the ulnar nerve proximal and distal to the cubital tunnel. Some authors suggest the existence of fascial bands within the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) capable of compressing the ulnar nerve. This study would suggest that fibrous bands deep in the FCU capable of compressing the ulnar nerve do not exist. Our satisfactory outcomes would support the perception that extensive decompression of the ulnar nerve beyond the cubital tunnel is not routinely needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amadio PC, Beckenbaugh RD. Entrapment of the ulnar nerve by the deep flexor-pronator aponeurosis. J Hand Surg Am. 1986;11:83–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bain GI, Bajhau A. Endoscopic release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow using the Agee device: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:691–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartels RH, Verhagen WI, van der Wilt GJ, et al. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: part 1. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:522–30. Discussion 522–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biggs MCurtis JA. Randomized, prospective study comparing ulnar neurolysis in situ with submuscular transposition. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:296–304. Discussion 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradshaw DY, Shefner JM. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurol Clin. 1999;17:447–61. v–vi.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Degeorges R, Masquelet AC. The cubital tunnel: anatomical study of its distal part. Surg Radiol Anat. 2002;24:169–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabel GT, Amadio PC. Reoperation for failed decompression of the ulnar nerve in the region of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:213–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gervasio O, Gambardella G, Zaccone C, et al. Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:108–17. Discussion 117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmann R, Siemionow M. The endoscopic management of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2006;31:23–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang JH, Samadani U, Zager EL. Ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy at the elbow: simple decompression. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:1150–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Macadam SA, Gandhi R, Bezuhly M, et al. Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1314.e1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mc GA. The results of transposition of the ulnar nerve for traumatic ulnar neuritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950;32-B:293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nakao Y, Takayama S, Toyama Y. Cubital tunnel release with lift-type endoscopic surgery. Hand Surg. 2001;6:199–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siemionow M, Agaoglu G, Hoffmann R. Anatomic characteristics of a fascia and its bands overlying the ulnar nerve in the proximal forearm: a cadaver study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007;32:302–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsai TM, Bonczar M, Tsuruta T, et al. A new operative technique: cubital tunnel decompression with endoscopic assistance. Hand Clin. 1995;11:71–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsai TM, Chen IC, Majd ME, et al. Cubital tunnel release with endoscopic assistance: results of a new technique. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:21–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Watts AC, Bain GI. Patient-rated outcome of ulnar nerve decompression: a comparison of endoscopic and open in situ decompression. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1492–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

There are no disclosures of financial support or possible conflict of interest on behalf of any of the three authors listed above. DJN serves as the President of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) and has ownership in Upex.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronak M. Patel.

About this article

Cite this article

Nagle, D.J., Patel, R.M. & Paisley, S. Endoscopic detection of compressing fascial bands around the ulnar nerve within the FCU. HAND 7, 103–107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-011-9377-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-011-9377-x

Keywords

Navigation