Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological Analysis of the Carpal Tunnel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Although carpal tunnel release is one of the most commonly performed procedures in the USA, the morphology of the carpal tunnel as determined previously in the literature has been questioned. Previous methodology has been questioned for accuracy by recent studies. The purpose of this study was to perform a morphological analysis of the carpal tunnel and correlate carpal tunnel and hand dimensions. The carpal tunnels of ten cadaveric specimens were emptied of their contents and a silicone cast of the carpal tunnel was then created. This cast was then digitized, and the dimensions of the carpal tunnel were calculated. These dimensions were compared with the measured hand dimensions of the specimens. The width, depth, tilt angle, length, cross-sectional area, and volume of the carpal tunnel were 19.2 ± 1.7 mm, 8.3 ± 0.9 mm, 14.8 ± 7.8°, 12.7 ± 2.5 mm, 134.9 ± 23.6 mm2, and 1,737 ± 542 mm3, respectively. Width, depth, and cross-sectional area did not change significantly along the length of the carpal tunnel, but tilt angle did. The width of the palm strongly correlates with the width of the carpal tunnel. Other dimensional correlations did not reach statistical significance. The carpal tunnel is of uniform dimension along its length. The long axis of the carpal tunnel in cross-section rotates volarly from the radial side of the hand increasingly with distal progression along the carpal tunnel. Based on our analysis of ten cadaveric specimens, the width of the carpal tunnel may be estimated by the width of the palm using the equation: \( {\text{Widt}}{{\text{h}}_{\text{CT}}} = 1.285 + 0.236 \times {\text{Widt}}{{\text{h}}_{\text{palm}}} \).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allmann KH, Horch R, Uhl M, et al. MR imaging of the carpal tunnel. Eur J Radiol. 1997;25(2):141–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bower JA, Stanisz GJ, Keir PJ. An MRI evaluation of carpal tunnel dimensions in healthy wrists: implications for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(8):816–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cobb TK, Dalley BK, Posteraro RH, et al. Establishment of carpal contents/canal ratio by means of magnetic resonance imaging. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;17(5):843–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobb TK, Dalley BK, Posteraro RH, et al. Anatomy of the flexor retinaculum. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1993;18(1):91–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb TK, Bond JR, Cooney WP, et al. Assessment of the ratio of carpal contents to carpal tunnel volume in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a preliminary report. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1997;22(4):635–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geoghegan JM, Clark DI, Bainbridge LC, et al. Risk factors in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2004;29:315–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horch RE, Allmann KH, Laubenberger J, et al. Median nerve compression can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging of the carpal tunnel. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(1):76–82. discussion 82-73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mogk JP, Keir PJ. Evaluation of the carpal tunnel based on 3-D reconstruction from MRI. J Biomech. 2007;40:2222–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monagle K, Dai G, Chu A, et al. Quantitative MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(6):1581–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer DH, Hanrahan LP. Social and economic costs of carpal tunnel surgery. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:167–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Papanicolaou GD, McCabe SJ, Firrell J. The prevalence and characteristics of nerve compression symptoms in the general population. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26(3):460–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Richman JA, Gelberman RH, Rydevik B, et al. Carpal tunnel volume determination by magnetic resonance imaging three-dimensional reconstruction. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1987;12(5 Pt 1):712–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Skie M, Zeiss J, Ebraheim NA, et al. Carpal tunnel changes and median nerve compression during wrist flexion and extension seen by magnetic resonance imaging. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1990;15(6):934–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshioka S, Okuda Y, Tamai K, et al. Changes in carpal tunnel shape during wrist joint motion. MRI evaluation of normal volunteers. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1993;18(5):620–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pacek CA, Chakan MC, Goitz RJ, Kaufmann RA, Li ZM. A morphological study of the transverse carpal ligament. Hand. 2009. doi:10.1007/s11552-009-9219-2

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank several people for their assistance: Matthew Chakan for the performance of experiments, Luke Xie for the three-dimensional figures, and Jay Irrgang, PhD, for the statistical analysis. The authors acknowledge the support from the National Institutes Health (NIH R03AR054510).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zong-Ming Li.

Additional information

Ethical Statement

As this was a cadaveric study, all experimentations were performed following the approval by the University of Pittsburgh Committee for Oversight of Research Involving the Dead (CORID).

About this article

Cite this article

Pacek, C.A., Tang, J., Goitz, R.J. et al. Morphological Analysis of the Carpal Tunnel. HAND 5, 77–81 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-009-9220-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-009-9220-9

Keywords

Navigation