Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Which Outcome Measure is the Best? Evaluating Responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale Following Hand and Wrist Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist pain, finger contracture, or tumor. Eighty-one subjects prospectively completed each questionnaire shortly before and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison tests. Responsiveness to clinical change was calculated using standardized response means. The DASH was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (0.77), wrist pain (0.61), and tumor (0.55); the MHQ was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (1.04), wrist pain (0.87), and finger contracture (0.62); and the PSFS was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (0.65) and finger contracture (0.64). The interval during which the highest responsiveness occurred for the carpal tunnel, wrist pain, and finger contracture groups was the preoperative to 6-month period. The tumor group experienced the highest responsiveness during the preoperative to 3-month period. Our results indicate that one or more of the instruments evaluated are suitable for outcomes research related to surgery to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist pain, finger contracture, and tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, et al. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:1204–17. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00407-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, et al. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose. Int Orthop. 2008;32:1–6. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0368-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77:820–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung KC, Kotsis SV. Outcomes of multiple microvascular toe transfers for reconstruction in 2 patients with digitless hands: 2- and 4-year follow-up case reports. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;27:652–8. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2002.33706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung KC, Wei FC. An outcome study of thumb reconstruction using microvascular toe transfer. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;25:651–8. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2000.6913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1998;23:575–87. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung KC, Hamill JB, Walters MR, et al. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:619–22. doi:10.1097/00000637-199906000-00006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM. Predictors of functional outcomes after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007;32:76–83. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, et al. Predictors of short-term outcome in people with a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Phys Ther. 2007;87:1619–32. doi:10.2522/ptj.20060155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988. p. 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Smet L. Responsiveness of the DASH score in surgically treated basal joint arthritis of the thumb: preliminary results. Clin Rheumatol. 2004;23:223–4. doi:10.1007/s10067-004-0866-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:250–4. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2003.50043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldfarb CA, Stern PJ. Metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. A long-term assessment. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1869–78.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, et al. Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2004;29:159–64. doi:10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.10.010.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:11. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-4-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herweijer H, Dijkstra PU, Nicolai JP, et al. Postoperative hand therapy in Dupuytren’s disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1736–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–8. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jolles BM, Buckbinder R, Beaton DE. A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:791–801. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klein RD, Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Open carpal tunnel release using a 1-centimeter incision: technique and outcomes for 104 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1616–22. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000057970.87632.7e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30:81–6. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kotsis SV, Lau FH, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007;32:84–90. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian occupational performance measure, 2nd ed. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, et al. Responsiveness of the short form-36, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;25:330–40. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Massy-Westropp N, Krishnan J, Ahern M. Comparing the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1996–2001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Navsarikar A, Gladman DD, Husted JA, et al. Validity assessment of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) for patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:2191.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nourbakhsh MR, Fearon FJ. The effect of oscillating-energy manual therapy on lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, placebo-control, double-blinded study. J Hand Ther. 2008;21:4–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sambandam SN, Priyanka P, Gul A, et al. Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int Orthop. 2008;32:497–504. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0344-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG 3rd, et al. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;27:537–41. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2002.32964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stewart M, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, et al. Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash. Spine. 2007;32:580–5. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000256380.71056.6d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stratford PW, Binkley FM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther. 1996;76:1109–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Szabo RM. Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26:993–1002. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2001.29487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vitiello AL, Bonello R, Pollard H. The effectiveness of ENAR for the treatment of chronic neck pain in Australian adults: a preliminary single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Chiropr Osteopat. 2007;15:9. doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Walker MJ. Manual physical therapy examination and intervention of a patient with radial wrist pain: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34:761–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:331–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Westphal T, Piatek S, Schubert S, et al. Reliability and validity of the upper limb DASH questionnaire in patients with distal radius fractures. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002;140:447–51. doi:10.1055/s-2002-33396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by a grant from The Orthopaedic and Arthritic Institute Musculoskeletal Research Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, M1 500 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada, M4N 3M5

    Catherine R. McMillan & Paul A. Binhammer

Authors
  1. Catherine R. McMillan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul A. Binhammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine R. McMillan.

About this article

Cite this article

McMillan, C.R., Binhammer, P.A. Which Outcome Measure is the Best? Evaluating Responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale Following Hand and Wrist Surgery. HAND 4, 311–318 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-009-9167-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-009-9167-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation