Abstract
Purpose
A comanipulator for assisting endorectal prostate biopsies is evaluated through a first-in-man clinical trial. This lightweight system, based on conventional robotic components, possesses six degrees of freedom. It uses three electric motors and three brakes. It features a free mode, where its low friction and inertia allow for natural manipulation of the probe and a locked mode, exhibiting both a very low stiffness and a high steady-state precision.
Methods
Clinical trials focusing on the free mode and the locked mode of the robot are presented. The objective was to evaluate the practical usability and performance of the robot during clinical procedures. A research protocol for a prospective randomized clinical trial has been designed. Its specific goal was to compare the accuracy of biopsies performed with and without the assistance of the comanipulator.
Results
The accuracy is compared between biopsies performed with and without the assistance of the comanipulator, across the 10 first patients included in the trial. Results show a statistically significant increase in the precision.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American cancer society. http://www.cancer.org
Bassan H, Hayes T, Patel R, Moallem M (2007) A novel manipulator for 3D ultrasound guided percutaneous needle insertion. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2007, pp 617–622
Baumann M, Mozer P, Daanen V, Troccaz J (2012) Prostate biopsy tracking with deformation estimation. Med Image Anal 16(3):562–576
Denavit J, Hartenberg RS (1955) A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. Trans ASME J Appl Mech 23:215–221
Eigen. www.eigen.com
Fichtinger G, DeWeese TL, Patriciu A, Tanacs A, Mazilu D, Anderson JH, Masamune K, Taylor RH, Stoianovici D (2002) System for robotically assisted prostate biopsy and therapy with intraoperative ct guidance. Acad Radiol 9(1):60–74
Fichtinger G, Fiene JP, Kennedy CW, Kronreif G, Iordachita I, Song DY, Burdette EC, Kazanzides P (2008) Robotic assistance for ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy. Med Image Anal 12(5):535–545 Special issue on the 10th international conference on medical imaging and computer assisted intervention - MICCAI 2007
Fischer G, Iordachita I, Csoma C, Tokuda J, DiMaio S, Tempany C, Hata N, Fichtinger G (2008) MRI-compatible pneumatic robot for transperineal prostate needle placement. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 13(3):295–305
Haption. http://www.haption.fr
Hungr N, Baumann M, Long J, Troccaz J (2012) A 3-d ultrasound robotic prostate brachytherapy system with prostate motion tracking. IEEE Trans Robot 28(6):1382–1397
Koelis. http://www.koelis.fr
Krieger A, Iordachita I, Guion P, Singh A, Kaushal A, Menard C, Pinto P, Camphausen K, Fichtinger G, Whitcomb L (2011) An MRI-compatible robotic system with hybrid tracking for MRI-guided prostate intervention. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(11):3049–3060
Lagerburg V, Moerland MA, Lagendijk JJ, Battermann JJ (2005) Measurement of prostate rotation during insertion of needles for brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 77(3):318–323
Lu-Yao G, Albertsen P, Moore D, Shih W, Lin Y, Di Paola R, Barry M, Zietman A, O’Leary M, Walker-Corkery E, Yao S (2009) Outcomes of localized prostate cancer following conservative management. JAMA 302(11):1202–1209
Patriciu A, Petrisor D, Muntener M, Mazilu D, Schar M, Stoianovici D (2007) Automatic brachytherapy seed placement under MRI guidance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(8):1499–1506
Phee L, Xiao D, Yuen J, Chan CF, Ho H, Choon H, Christopher C, Wan SN (2005) Ultrasound guided robotic system for transperineal biopsy of the prostate. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2005. ICRA 2005. pp 1315–1320
Podder T, Ng WS, Yu Y (2007) Multi-channel robotic system for prostate brachytherapy. In: Engineering in medicine and biology society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th annual international conference of the IEEE, pp 1233–1236
Poquet Torterotot C, Vitrani MA, Mozer P, Morel G (2014) Achieving high precision in prostate biopsy thanks to robot closed loop control based on 3D ultrasound imaging. In: Surgetica 2014, pp 1–4
Poquet C, Mozer P, Vitrani MA, Morel G (2015) An endorectal ultrasound probe comanipulator with hybrid actuation combining brakes and motors. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 20(1):186–196. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2014.2314859
Schneider C, Okamura A, Fichtinger G (2004) A robotic system for transrectal needle insertion into the prostate with integrated ultrasound. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA ’04. 2004, vol 1, pp 365–370
Song SE, Cho N, Fischer G, Hata N, Tempany C, Fichtinger G, Iordachita I (2010) Development of a pneumatic robot for MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy and brachytherapy: new approaches. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 2010, pp 2580–2585
Stattin P, Holmberg E, Johansson JE, Holmberg L, Adolfsson J, Hugosson J (2010) Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(13):950–958
Stone NN, Roy J, Hong S, Lo YC, Stock RG (2002) Prostate gland motion and deformation caused by needle placement during brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 1(3):154–160
Torterotot C, Mozer P, Baumann M, Vitrani M, Morel G (2010) Analysis of endorectal probe kinematics during prostate biopsies. In: Proceedings of the Hamlyn symposium on medical robotics, ISBN: 978-0-9563776-1-6, pp 47–48
Torterotot-Poquet C, Vitrani MA, Mozer P, Morel G (Dec.2011) Ultrasound image-based comanipulation for enhanced perception of the contacts with a distal soft organ. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), 2011, pp 1140–1146
van den Bosch MR, Moman MR, van Vulpen M, Battermann JJ, Duiveman E, van Schelven LJ, de Leeuw H, Lagendijk JJW, Moerland MA (2010) MRI-guided robotic system for transperineal prostate interventions: proof of principle. Phys Med Biol 55(5):N133
Wei Z, Ding M, Downey D, Fenster A (2005) 3D TRUS guided robot assisted prostate brachytherapy. In: Duncan J, Gerig G (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention-MICCAI 2005, lecture notes in computer science, vol 3750. Springer, New York, pp 17–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants
The research protocol for a clinical trial was authorized by the sponsor of the clinical study (Grenoble University Hospital) and the relevant legal authorities through the reference PROSBOT-Apollo Biopsies assisted by comanipulated robot—Pilot Clinical trial, 2015; Acceptance number NCT02132975. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
This work was partly supported by the project PROSBOT funded by ANR, TECSAN 2011 program, under reference ANR-11-TECS-0017 and by French state funds managed by the ANR within the Investissements d’Avenir programme (Labex CAMI) under reference ANR-11-LABX-0004.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vitrani, MA., Baumann, M., Reversat, D. et al. Prostate biopsies assisted by comanipulated probe-holder: first in man. Int J CARS 11, 1153–1161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1399-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1399-y