Skip to main content
Log in

Fusion of coronary angiography and stress echocardiography for myocardial viability evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

 Identification of viable myocardial tissue is important for patients with a low left ventricular ejection fraction, since revascularization is effective only if the affected region is viable. After cineangiographic identification of occluded coronary vessels, the myocardial viability is usually determined using cardiac MRI or SPECT. Alternatively, myocardial deformation imaging by echocardiography has been introduced that allows detection of viable myocardium directly within the catheterization laboratory. Multimodality fusion of coronary angiograms and echocardiograms was developed to match viable regions with areas affected by occluded vessels.

Methods

 Identification of corresponding myocardial regions in both coronary angiograms and ultrasound scans was performed using multimodality image fusion. Geometrically correct superposition of these images was done to allow direct identification of the involved myocardial regions. An electromagnetic tracking system was used as a common base for co-registration of the images. The system was tested using a phantom test device in a cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Results

 A 2D projection error of \(3.8 \pm 1.1\,\text {mm}\) was achieved in trials using a cardiac phantom test object.

Conclusions

 Superimposition of the occluded coronary artery and the regional myocardial viability was achieved using automated multimodality fusion of coronary angiograms and stress echocardiograms with in vitro experiments. This system is promising for integrated single step angiography and angioplasty that may reduce procedure time, cost and length of hospitalization. Further testing in vivo is needed to verify and validate the system in a clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonow RO et al (2011) Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 364(17):1617–1625

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pierard LA, De Landsheere CM, Berthe C, Rigo P, Kulbertus HE (1990) Identification of viable myocardium by echocardiography during dobutamine infusion in patients with myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy: comparison with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:1021–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zaglavara T, Pilla T, Karvounis H, Haaverstad R, Parharidis G, Louridas G, Kenny A (2005) Detection of myocardial viability by dobutamine stress echocardiography: incremental value of diastolic wall thickness measurement. Heart 91:613–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rizzello V, Poldermans D, Schinkel AF, Biagini E, Boersma E, Elhendy A, Sozzi FB, Maat A, Crea F, Roelandt JR, Baxx JJ (2006) Long term prognosis value of myocardial viability and ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary revascularization. Heart 92:239–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anselmi M, Golia G, Cicoira M, Tinto M, Nitti MT, Trappolin R, Rossi A, Zanolla L, Marino P, Zardini P (1998) Prognostic value of detection of myocardial viability using low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in infarcted patients. Am J Cardiol 81:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Varga A, Rodriguez MA, Picano E (2006) Safety of stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 98:541–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Derumeaux G, Loufoua J, Pontier G, Cribier A, Ovize M (2001) Tissue Doppler imaging differentiates transmural from nontransmural acute myocardial infarction after reperfusion therapy. Circulation 103:589–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weidemann F, Dommke C, Bijnens B, Mertens P, Verbeken E, Maes A, Van de Werf F, De Scheerder I, Sutherland GR (2003) Defining the transmurality of a chronic myocardial infarction by ultrasonic strain-rate imaging. Circulation 107:883–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Chan AKY, Yu CM, Yip GWK, Fung JWH, Lam WWM, So NMC, Wang M, Wu EB, Wong JT, Sanderson JE (2005) Strain rate imaging differentiates transmural from non-transmural myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:864–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atesok K, Schemitsch EH (2010 May) Computer-assisted trauma surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(5):247–258

  11. Aurora, Northern Digital Incorporated (2013) http://www.ndigital.com/products/aurora.php. Retrieved 3 May 2013

  12. Tsai RY (1987) A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses. IEEE J Robot Autom 3(4):323–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wood B et al (2005) Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:493–505

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutiérrez LF et al (2007) Multimodality image guidance system integrating X-ray fluoroscopy and ultrasound image streams with electromagnetic tracking. Proc SPIE 6509:65090K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bisplinghoff S, de la Fuente M, Becker M, Radermacher K (2010) Registration method for displaying electromagnetically tracked devices in fluoroscopic images. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 3719–3722

  16. Hsu PW et al (2008) Comparison of freehand 3-D ultrasound calibration techniques using a stylus. Ultrasound Med Biol 34(10):1610–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brendel B (2005) Intraoperativer Ultraschall zur Registrierung von Knochenstrukturen in der navigierten Chirurgie, PhD Thesis, Ruhr Universität Bochum, pp 65–98

  18. Mountney P et al (2012) Ultrasound and fluoroscopic images fusion by autonomous ultrasound probe detection. MICCAI Lect Notes 7511:544–551

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elfring R (2012) Störungskompensation und Optimierung des elektromagnetischen Trackings in der computerunterstützten Chirurgie, PhD Thesis, RWTH Aachen University

Download references

Conflict of interest

Stefan Bisplinghoff, Christoph Hänisch, Michael Becker, Klaus Radermacher and Matias de la Fuente declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bisplinghoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bisplinghoff, S., Hänisch, C., Becker, M. et al. Fusion of coronary angiography and stress echocardiography for myocardial viability evaluation. Int J CARS 10, 11–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1063-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1063-3

Keywords

Navigation