Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Invasive ductal breast cancer: preoperative predict Ki-67 index based on radiomics of ADC maps

  • BREAST RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to develop a radiomics model for predicting the Ki-67 proliferation index in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively.

Materials and methods

A total of 128 patients who were clinicopathologically diagnosed with invasive ductal breast cancer were recruited. This cohort included 32 negative Ki67 expression (Ki67 proliferation index < 14%) and 96 cases with positive Ki67 expression (Ki67 proliferation index ≥ 14%). All patients had undergone diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI before surgery on a 3.0T MRI scanner. Radiomics features were extracted from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps which were obtained by DWI-MRI from patients with invasive ductal breast cancer. 80% of the patients were divided into training set to build radiomics model, and the rest into test set to evaluate its performance. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to select radiomics features, and then, the logistic regression (LR) model was established using fivefold cross-validation to predict the Ki-67 index. The performance was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Quantitative imaging features (n = 1029) were extracted from ADC maps, and 11 features were selected to construct the LR model. Good identification ability was exhibited by the ADC-based radiomics model, with areas under the ROC (AUC) values of 0.75 ± 0.08, accuracy of 0.71 in training set and 0.72, 0.70 in test set.

Conclusions

The ADC-based radiomics model is a feasible predictor for the Ki-67 index in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer. Therefore, we proposed that three-dimensional imaging features from ADC maps could be used as candidate biomarker for preoperative prediction the Ki-67 index noninvasively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2017) Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 67:7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacCallum DE, Hall PA (2000) The location of pKi67 in the outer dense fibrillary compartment of the nucleolus points to a role in ribosome biogenesis during the cell division cycle. J Pathol 190:537–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D, Gao D, Leung S, Snider J et al (2009) Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:736–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petrelli F, Viale G, Cabiddu M, Barni S (2015) Prognostic value of different cut-off levels of Ki-67 in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64,196 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153:477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park SH, Choi HY, Hahn SY (2015) Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 41:175–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Molinari C, Clauser P, Girometti R, Linda A, Cimino E, Puglisi F et al (2015) MR mammography using diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating breast cancer: a correlation with proliferation index. Radiol Med (Torino) 120:911–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB et al (2012) Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1234–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S et al (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:4006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Itakura H, Achrol AS, Mitchell LA, Loya JJ, Liu T, Westbroek EM et al (2015) Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities. Sci Transl Med 7:303ra138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang YQ, Liang CH, He L, Tian J, Liang CS, Chen X et al (2016) Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 34:2157–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fusco R, Sansone M, Filice S, Granata V, Catalano O, Amato DM et al (2015) Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative parameters for breast lesion classification. Biomed Res Int 2015:237863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang C, Huang Y, He L, Chen X, Ma Z, Dong D et al (2016) The development and validation of a CT-based radiomics signature for the preoperative discrimination of stage I-II and stage III-IV colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 7:31401–31412

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Y, Kim J, Balagurunathan Y, Li Q, Garcia AL, Stringfield O et al (2016) Radiomic features are associated with EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Lung Cancer 17(441–8):e6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kickingereder P, Gotz M, Muschelli J, Wick A, Neuberger U, Shinohara RT et al (2016) Large-scale radiomic profiling of recurrent glioblastoma identifies an imaging predictor for stratifying anti-angiogenic treatment response. Clin Cancer Res 22:5765–5771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ouyang FS, Guo BL, Zhang B, Dong YH, Zhang L, Mo XK et al (2017) Exploration and validation of radiomics signature as an independent prognostic biomarker in stage III–IVb nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget 8:74869–74879

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang C, Cheng Z, Huang Y, He L, Chen X, Ma Z et al (2018) An MRI-based radiomics classifier for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 status in breast cancer. Acad Radiol 25:1111–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Freedman D, Pisani R, Purves R (2007) Statistics: fourth international student edition. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 9780393930436

  20. Wu J, Tha KK, Xing L, Li R (2018) Radiomics and radiogenomics for precision radiotherapy. J Radiat Res 59:i25–i31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Azambuja E, Cardoso F, de Castro G, Colozza M, Mano MS, Durbecq V et al (2007) Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients. Br J Cancer 96:1504–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Altay C, Balci P, Altay S, Karasu S, Saydam S, Canda T et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: role in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. JBR-BTR: organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR) 97:211–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin G, An N, Jacobs MA, Li K (2010) The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results. Acad Radiol 17:456–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li L, Wang K, Sun X, Wang K, Sun Y, Zhang G et al (2015) Parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as imaging markers for angiogenesis and proliferation in human breast cancer. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res 21:376–382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ye XH, Gao JY, Yang ZH, Liu Y (2014) Apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility of the pancreas measured at different MR scanners using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson imaging JMRI 40:1375–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomassin-Naggara I, De Bazelaire C, Chopier J, Bazot M, Marsault C, Trop I (2013) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the breast: advantages and pitfalls. Eur J Radiol 82:435–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P et al (2012) Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48:441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gillies RJ (2015) Abstract CN01-01: The radiology reading room of the future. Mol Cancer Ther 14:CN01-CN

    Google Scholar 

  29. Joseph C, Papadaki A, Althobiti M, Alsaleem M, Aleskandarany MA, Rakha EA (2018) Breast cancer intra-tumour heterogeneity: Current status and clinical implications. Histopathology 73:717–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fusco R, Di Marzo M, Sansone C, Sansone M, Petrillo A (2017) Breast DCE-MRI: lesion classification using dynamic and morphological features by means of a multiple classifier system. Eur Radiol Exp 1:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma W, Ji Y, Qi L, Guo X, Jian X, Liu P (2018) Breast cancer Ki67 expression prediction by DCE-MRI radiomics features. Clin Radiol 73:909

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liang M, Cai Z, Zhang H, Huang C, Meng Y, Zhao L, et al. (2019) Machine learning-based analysis of rectal cancer MRI radiomics for prediction of metachronous liver metastasis. Acad Radiol 26:1495–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sui H, Liu L, Li X, Zuo P, Cui J, Mo Z (2019) CT-based radiomics features analysis for predicting the risk of anterior mediastinal lesions. J of Thorac Dis 11:1809–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang H, Hu D, Yao H, Chen M, Li S, Chen H, et al. (2019) Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for the preoperative evaluation of pathological grade in bladder cancer tumors. Eur Radiol 29:6182–6190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fusco R, Sansone M, Filice S, Carone G, Amato DM, Sansone C et al (2016) Pattern recognition approaches for breast cancer DCE-MRI classification: a systematic review. J Med Biol Eng 36:449–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#81771804).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaowu Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing financial interests exist.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. IRB approval was obtained. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhang, K. et al. Invasive ductal breast cancer: preoperative predict Ki-67 index based on radiomics of ADC maps. Radiol med 125, 109–116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01100-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01100-1

Keywords

Navigation