Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of incidental pulmonary nodule in CT: a survey by the Italian College of Chest Radiology

  • CHEST RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to present the results of the Italian survey on the management of pulmonary nodules incidentally identified at computed tomography (CT).

Materials and methods

An online electronic survey, consisting of 23 multiple-choice questions, was created using the SurveyMonkey web-based tool. The questionnaire was developed by the Board of the Italian College of Chest Radiology of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) and by an experienced group of Italian Academic Chest Radiologists. The link to the online electronic survey was submitted by email to all the SIRM members.

Results

A total of 767 radiologists, corresponding to 7.5% of all the SIRM members, participated in the online survey. The majority of participants (92%) routinely describe the attenuation of pulmonary nodules in the report, and 84.1% recommend the further follow-up, with 92.7% of respondents taking CT nodule morphological features into consideration. The 57.7% of participants adhere to the Fleischner Society guidelines for the management of incidental pulmonary nodules. However, 56.6% and 75.6% of respondents have a more cautious approach than that recommended by the guidelines and tend to use a shorter follow-up for both solid and ground-glass nodules, respectively. Finally, 94.5% of participants favor congresses and refresher courses dedicated to insights on lung nodule diagnosis and management.

Conclusions

This survey demonstrates that the management of pulmonary nodules incidentally detected on CT is still complex and controversial. The majority of SIRM members express a need for an update on this topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gould MK, Tang T, Liu IL, Lee J, Zheng C, Danforth KN, Kosco AE, Di Fiore JL, Suh DE (2015) Recent trends in the identification of incidental pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 192(10):1208–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, Mehta AC, Ohno Y, Powell CA, Prokop M, Rubin GD, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Travis WD, Van Schil PE, Bankier AA (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284(1):228–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin DR, Callister ME, Guideline Development Group (2015) The British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 70(8):794–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, Mazzone PJ, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, Wiener RS (2013) Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143(5 Suppl):e93S–e120S

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Survey Monkey web-based survey tool. https://www.surveymonkey.com. Accessed Apr 2018

  6. Bankier AA, MacMahon H, Goo JM, Rubin GD, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Naidich DP (2017) Recommendations for measuring pulmonary nodules at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 285(2):584–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohno Y, Nishio M, Koyama H, Miura S, Yoshikawa T, Matsumoto S, Sugimura K (2014) Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for pulmonary nodule assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(3):515–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gariani J, Martin SP, Botsikas D, Becker CD, Montet X (2018) Evaluating the effect of increased pitch, iterative reconstruction and dual source CT on dose reduction and image quality. Br J Radiol 15:20170443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang M, Qi W, Sun Y, Jiang Y, Liu X, Hong N (2017) Screening for lung cancer using sub-millisievert chest CT with iterative reconstruction algorithm: image quality and nodule detectability. Br J Radiol 5:20170658

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kubo T, Ohno Y, Kauczor HU, Hatabu H (2014) Radiation dose reduction in chest CT—review of available options. Eur J Radiol 83(10):1953–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iezzi R, Larici AR, Franchi P, Marano R, Magarelli N, Posa A, Merlino B, Manfredi R, Colosimo C (2017) Tailoring protocols for chest CT applications: when and how? Diagn Interv Radiol 23(6):420–427

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Eisenberg RL, Bankier AA, Boiselle PM (2010) Compliance with Fleischner Society guidelines for management of small lung nodules: a survey of 834 radiologists. Radiology 255(1):218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Powell HA, Baldwin DR (2014) Multidisciplinary team management in thoracic oncology: more than just a concept? Eur Respir J 43(6):1776–1786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Groheux D, Quere G, Blanc E, Lemarignier C, Vercellino L, de Margerie-Mellon C, Merlet P, Querellou S (2016) FDG PET-CT for solitary pulmonary nodule and lung cancer: literature review. Diagn Interv Imaging 97(10):1003–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coppola F, Bibbolino C, Grassi R, Pierotti L, Silverio R, Lassandro F, Neri E, Regge D (2016) Results of an Italian survey on teleradiology. Radiol Med 121(8):652–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Silvestri E, Barile A, Albano D, Messina C, Orlandi D, Corazza A, Zugaro L, Masciocchi C, Sconfienza LM (2018) Interventional therapeutic procedures in the musculoskeletal system: an Italian Survey by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Radiol Med 123(4):314–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tambor SE, Chase GA, Faden RR, Geller G, Hofman KJ, Holtzman NA (1993) Improving response rate through incentive and follow-up: the effect on a survey of physicians’ knowledge of genetics. Am J Public Health 83(11):1599–1603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sibbald B, Addington J, Brenneman D, Freeling P (1994) Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations. Br J Gen Pract 44:297–300

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the President and all the members of the SIRM who participated in this survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristiano Rampinelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Questionnaire with the results for each question

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rampinelli, C., Cicchetti, G., Cortese, G. et al. Management of incidental pulmonary nodule in CT: a survey by the Italian College of Chest Radiology. Radiol med 124, 602–612 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01011-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01011-1

Keywords

Navigation