Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiation dose during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): upgrade of an angiographic system from standard to Eco mode

  • RADIOBIOLOGY AND SAFETY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the radiation dose reduction during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) after the reconfiguration of a Philips AlluraXper FD20 X-ray system.

Methods

Between 2013 and 2015, we implemented a low-dose protocol (Eco dose) increasing the filtration with 1 mm of Al and 0.1 of Cu on both fluoroscopy and fluorography and halving the frames per second in fluoroscopy. The switch was complemented by hybrid operating room staff education and training in radiation protection. We compared two samples of 50 patients treated before the switch (normal dose) with 50 patients treated after the switch (Eco dose). Procedures were categorized into two different grades of complexity, standard and complex, intended as fenestrated/chimney/snorkel and EVAR plus additional embolization to prevent endoleak type II. We evaluated patient demographics, Air Kerma (AK), dose area product (DAP), and procedural data (fluoroscopy time, number of fluorographies, and iodinated contrast). Staff radiation dose was measured with film badge dosimeter on C-arm.

Results

The Eco-dose protocol witnessed a DAP reduction of 53% in standard EVARs and of 57% in complex EVARs and an AK reduction of 45% in standard and 57% in complex EVAR. The image quality in 2016 was perceived acceptable, as proven by the fact that fluoroscopy time, number of fluorographies, and contrast medium volumes did not have to be increased. We achieved a reduction in staff dose of 25.6%.

Conclusions

Optimized angiographic system setting significantly reduced the radiation dose both to the patients and to the staff assuring safe EVAR procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dua A, Kuy S, Lee CJ et al (2014) Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010. J Vasc Surg 59:1512–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Santosa F, Moysidis T, Nowak T et al (2012) Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair: trends in Germany. VASA Z Gefasskrankheiten 41:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weerakkody RA, Walsh SR, Cousins C et al (2008) Radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 95:699–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Summary of the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom: essentials for health professionals in radiology. Insights Imaging 6:411–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0410-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Valentin J (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 30:7–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6453(01)00004-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van den Haak RFF, Hamans BC, Zuurmond K et al (2015) Significant radiation dose reduction in the hybrid operating room using a novel X-ray imaging technology. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg 50:480–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.06.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkwood ML, Arbique GM, Guild JB et al (2013) Surgeon education decreases radiation dose in complex endovascular procedures and improves patient safety. J Vasc Surg 58:715–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haqqani OP, Agarwal PK, Halin NM, Iafrati MD (2012) Minimizing radiation exposure to the vascular surgeon. J Vasc Surg 55:799–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fetterly KA, Mathew V, Lennon R et al (2012) Radiation dose reduction in the invasive cardiovascular laboratory: implementing a culture and philosophy of radiation safety. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5:866–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peach G, Sinha S, Black SA et al (2012) Operator-controlled imaging significantly reduces radiation exposure during EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 44:395–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.08.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell EL, Furey P (2011) Prevention of radiation injury from medical imaging. J Vasc Surg 53:22S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB et al (2009) Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR 20:S263–S273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walker TG, Kalva SP, Ganguli S et al (2012) Image optimization during endovascular aneurysm repair. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:200–206. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.6608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller DL, Balter S, Noonan PT, Georgia JD (2002) Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures. Radiology 225:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2252011414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Dijk JD, Ottervanger JP, Delnoy PPHM et al (2017) Impact of new X-ray technology on patient dose in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantations. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 48:105–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0200-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gislason-Lee AJ, Keeble C, Malkin CJ et al (2016) Impact of latest generation cardiac interventional X-ray equipment on patient image quality and radiation dose for trans-catheter aortic valve implantations. Br J Radiol 89:20160269. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkwood ML, Guild JB, Arbique GM et al (2016) New image-processing and noise-reduction software reduces radiation dose during complex endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 64:1357–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Ruiter QMB, Moll FL, Gijsberts CM, van Herwaarden JA (2016) Allura Clarity radiation dose-reduction technology in the hybrid operating room during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther Off J Int Soc Endovasc Spec 23:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602815622433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryckx N, Sans-Merce M, Meuli R et al (2016) System upgrade on philips allura FD20 angiography systems: effects on patient skin dose and static image quality. Radiat Prot Dosim 169:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv484

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Fronda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruffino, M.A., Fronda, M., Discalzi, A. et al. Radiation dose during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): upgrade of an angiographic system from standard to Eco mode. Radiol med 123, 966–972 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0924-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0924-1

Keywords

Navigation