Skip to main content
Log in

Early post-procedural patients compliance and VAS after UAE through transradial versus transfemoral approach: preliminary results

  • VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study is to verify VAS and patient compliance in the immediate post-procedural time, in patients undergoing UAE through radial approach versus femoral procedure.

Methods

Between January and September 2017, 30 consecutive patients (age range 28–47, average 32 years) were enrolled for the study. UAE was performed by two interventional radiologists with more than 10 years of experience and more than 100 cases of UAE done. Patients were divided into two groups: transfemoral approach (group a, n = 15 patients) and transradial approach (group b, n = 15 patients). After procedure, patients were questioned about the compliance using the questionnaire at 24 h and VAS rating at 6, 12, 18 and 24 h.

Results

The average of VAS in group b was lower than in group a in each evaluation at 6 h (p < 0.20), 12 h (p < 0.07), 18 h (p < 0.02) and 24 h (p < 0.22) on the basis of Mann–Whitney U test, however, without a clear scientific evidence. Also the compliance score at 24 h had better results in the group b (average 14.0, range 13.0–16.0) in comparison with group a (average 18.0, range 17.0–21.4) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Transradial approach improves the compliance and VAS of patients undergone to UAE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

UAE:

Uterine artery embolization

VAS:

Visual analog score

TR:

Transradial

TF:

Transfemoral

IRB:

Institutional review board

INR:

International normalized ratio

NSAID:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

RA:

Radial artery

US:

Ultrasound

References

  1. Michael TT, Alomar M, Papayannis A et al (2013) A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6(11):1138–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper CJ, El-Sheiekn RA, Cohen DJ et al (1999) Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization; a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 138:430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Resnick NJ, Kim E, Patel RS, Lookstein RA, Nowkowski SF, Fischman MA (2014) Uterine artery embolization using a transradial approach: initial experience and technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:443–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hibbert B, Simard S, Wilson KR et al (2012) Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese. J Am Coll Cariol Interv 5:819–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbeau GR, Arsenault F, Dugas L, Simard S, Larivière MM (2004) Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen’s test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J 147(3):489–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL (2017) Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the cirse classification system. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 40(8):1141–1146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY et al (2008) Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 1(4):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR (2009) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 157(1):132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iezzi R, Pompili M, Posa A et al (2017) Transradial versus transfemoral access for hepatic chemoembolization: intrapatient prospective single-center study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28(9):1234–1239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar AJ, Jones LE, Kollmeyer KR et al (2017) Radial artery access for peripheral endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 66(3):820–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Posham R, Biederman DM, Patel RS et al (2016) Transradial approach for noncoronary interventions: a single-center review of safety and feasibility in the first 1,500 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 27(2):159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cartwright SL, Knudson MP (2008) Evaluation of acute abdominal pain in adults. Am Family Phys 77(7):971–978

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Boncoraglio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basile, A., Rebonato, A., Failla, G. et al. Early post-procedural patients compliance and VAS after UAE through transradial versus transfemoral approach: preliminary results. Radiol med 123, 885–889 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0920-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0920-5

Keywords

Navigation