Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Texture analysis as a predictor of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck patients undergoing IMRT

  • COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Image texture analysis (TA) is a heterogeneity quantifying approach that cannot be appreciated by the naked eye, and early evidence suggests that TA has great potential in the field of oncology. The aim of this study is to evaluate parotid gland texture analysis (TA) combined with formal dosimetry as a factor for predicting severe late xerostomia in patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancers.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated at our Radiation Oncology Unit between January 2010 and December 2015, and selected the patients whose normal dose constraints for the parotid gland (mean dose < 26 Gy for the bilateral gland) could not be satisfied due to the presence of positive nodes close to the parotid glands. The parotid gland that showed the higher V30 was contoured on CT simulation and analysed with LifeX Software©. TA parameters included features of grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), neighbourhood grey-level dependence matrix (NGLDM), grey-level run length matrix (GLRLM), grey-level zone length matrix (GLZLM), sphericity, and indices from the grey-level histogram. We performed a univariate and multivariate analysis between all the texture parameters, the volume of the gland, the normal dose parameters (V30 and Mean Dose), and the development of severe chronic xerostomia.

Results

Seventy-eight patients were included and 25 (31%) developed chronic xerostomia. The TA parameters correlated with severe chronic xerostomia included V30 (OR 5.63), Dmean (OR 5.71), Kurtosis (OR 0.78), GLCM Correlation (OR 1.34), and RLNU (OR 2.12). The multivariate logistic regression showed a significant correlation between V30 (0.001), GLCM correlation (p: 0.026), RLNU (p: 0.011), and chronic xerostomia (p < 0.001, R2:0.664).

Conclusions

Xerostomia represents an important cause of morbidity for head and neck cancer survivors after radiation therapy, and in certain cases normal dose constraints cannot be satisfied. Our results seem promising as texture analysis could enhance the normal dose constraints for the prediction of xerostomia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dirix P, Nuyts S (2010) Evidence-based organ-sparing radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol 11(1):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70231-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Retel VP, van der Molen L, Hilgers FJ, Rasch CR, L’Ortye AA, Steuten LM, van Harten WH (2011) A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 11:475. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vissink A, Jansma J, Spijkervet FK, Burlage FR, Coppes RP (2003) Oral sequelae of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med Off Publ Am Assoc of Oral Biol 14(3):199–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chao KS, Ozyigit G, Blanco AI, Thorstad WL, Deasy JO, Haughey BH, Spector GJ, Sessions DG (2004) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: impact of tumor volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chao KS, Deasy JO, Markman J, Haynie J, Perez CA, Purdy JA, Low DA (2001) A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: initial results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49(4):907–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisbruch A, Ship JA, Dawson LA, Kim HM, Bradford CR, Terrell JE, Chepeha DB, Teknos TN, Hogikyan ND, Anzai Y, Marsh LH, Ten Haken RK, Wolf GT (2003) Salivary gland sparing and improved target irradiation by conformal and intensity modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. World J Surg 27(7):832–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisbruch A, Ten Haken RK, Kim HM, Marsh LH, Ship JA (1999) Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45(3):577–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vissink A, Burlage FR, Spijkervet FK, Jansma J, Coppes RP (2003) Prevention and treatment of the consequences of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med Off Publ Am Assoc of Oral Biol 14(3):213–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein JB, Emerton S, Kolbinson DA, Le ND, Phillips N, Stevenson-Moore P, Osoba D (1999) Quality of life and oral function following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Head Neck 21(1):1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blanco AI, Chao KS, El Naqa I, Franklin GE, Zakarian K, Vicic M, Deasy JO (2005) Dose-volume modeling of salivary function in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62(4):1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pow EH, Kwong DL, McMillan AS, Wong MC, Sham JS, Leung LH, Leung WK (2006) Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(4):981–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McMillan AS, Pow EH, Kwong DL, Wong MC, Sham JS, Leung LH, Leung WK (2006) Preservation of quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results of a prospective longitudinal study. Head Neck 28(8):712–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhide SA, Gulliford S, Schick U, Miah A, Zaidi S, Newbold K, Nutting CM, Harrington KJ (2012) Dose-response analysis of acute oral mucositis and pharyngeal dysphagia in patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemo-IMRT for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 103(1):88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Colangelo LA (1997) Speech and swallowing rehabilitation for head and neck cancer patients. Oncology 11(5):651–656 (discussion 659, 663–654)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, Ten Haken RK, Constine LS, Eisbruch A, Bentzen SM, Nam J, Deasy JO (2010) Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(3 Suppl):S10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Davnall FYCSP, Ljungqvist G et al (2012) Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? Insights Imaging 3:573–589

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nardone V, Tini P, Carbone SF, Grassi A, Biondi M, Sebaste L, Carfagno T, Vanzi E, De Otto G, Battaglia G, Rubino G, Pastina P, Belmonte G, Mazzoni LN, Banci Buonamici F, Mazzei MA, Pirtoli L (2017) Bone texture analysis using CT-simulation scans to individuate risk parameters for radiation-induced insufficiency fractures. Osteoporos Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3968-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nardone V, Tini P, Sebaste L, Biondi M, Banci Buonamici F, Pirtoli L (2016) Bone structure texture analysis as a potential tool to estimate radiation induced insufficiency fracture risk. Radiother Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alobaidli S, McQuaid S, South C, Prakash V, Evans P, Nisbet A (2014) The role of texture analysis in imaging as an outcome predictor and potential tool in radiotherapy treatment planning. Br J Radiol 87(1042):20140369. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140369

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coroller TP, Agrawal V, Narayan V, Hou Y, Grossmann P, Lee SW, Mak RH, Aerts HJ (2016) Radiomic phenotype features predict pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.004

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scalco E, Fiorino C, Cattaneo GM, Sanguineti G, Rizzo G (2013) Texture analysis for the assessment of structural changes in parotid glands induced by radiotherapy. Radioth Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 109(3):384–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fruehwald-Pallamar J, Czerny C, Holzer-Fruehwald L, Nemec SF, Mueller-Mang C, Weber M, Mayerhoefer ME (2013) Texture-based and diffusion-weighted discrimination of parotid gland lesions on MR images at 3.0 Tesla. NMR Biomed 26(11):1372–1379. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.2962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang X, Tridandapani S, Beitler JJ, Yu DS, Yoshida EJ, Curran WJ, Liu T (2012) Ultrasound GLCM texture analysis of radiation-induced parotid-gland injury in head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy: an in vivo study of late toxicity. Med Phys 39(9):5732–5739. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4747526

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Eisbruch A, Kim HM, Terrell JE, Marsh LH, Dawson LA, Ship JA (2001) Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50(3):695–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meirovitz A, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Schipper M, Pan C, Eisbruch A (2006) Grading xerostomia by physicians or by patients after intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(2):445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Schaaf A, Xu CJ, van Luijk P, Van’t Veld AA, Langendijk JA, Schilstra C (2012) Multivariate modeling of complications with data driven variable selection: guarding against overfitting and effects of data set size. Radiother Oncol 105(1):115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. van Acker F, Flamen P, Lambin P, Maes A, Kutcher GJ, Weltens C, Hermans R, Baetens J, Dupont P, Rijnders A, Maes A, van den Bogaert W, Mortelmans L (2001) The utility of SPECT in determining the relationship between radiation dose and salivary gland dysfunction after radiotherapy. Nucl Med Commun 22(2):225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Buus S, Grau C, Munk OL, Rodell A, Jensen K, Mouridsen K, Keiding S (2006) Individual radiation response of parotid glands investigated by dynamic 11C-methionine PET. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 78(3):262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.02.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Braam PM, Roesink JM, Moerland MA, Raaijmakers CP, Schipper M, Terhaard CH (2005) Long-term parotid gland function after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62(3):659–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pellegrino F, Groff E, Bastiani L, Fattori B, Sotti G (2015) Assessment of radiation-induced xerostomia: validation of the Italian version of the xerostomia questionnaire in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 23(4):925–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2438-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee TF, Fang FM (2013) Quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC) guideline validation using quality of life questionnaire datasets for parotid gland constraints to avoid causing xerostomia during head-and-neck radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 106(3):352–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beetz I, Steenbakkers RJ, Chouvalova O, Leemans CR, Doornaert P, van der Laan BF, Christianen ME, Vissink A, Bijl HP, van Luijk P, Langendijk JA (2014) The QUANTEC criteria for parotid gland dose and their efficacy to prevent moderate to severe patient-rated xerostomia. Acta Oncol 53(5):597–604. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2013.831186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Miah AB, Gulliford SL, Clark CH, Bhide SA, Zaidi SH, Newbold KL, Harrington KJ, Nutting CM (2013) Dose-response analysis of parotid gland function: what is the best measure of xerostomia? Radiother Oncol 106(3):341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tribius S, Sommer J, Prosch C, Bajrovic A, Muenscher A, Blessmann M, Kruell A, Petersen C, Todorovic M, Tennstedt P (2013) Xerostomia after radiotherapy. What matters–mean total dose or dose to each parotid gland? Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft [et al] 189(3):216–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0257-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ, Urbano TG, Bhide SA, Clark C, Miles EA, Miah AB, Newbold K, Tanay M, Adab F, Jefferies SJ, Scrase C, Yap BK, A’Hern RP, Sydenham MA, Emson M, Hall E, group Ptm (2011) Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12(2):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70290-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Scalco E, Moriconi S, Rizzo G (2015) Texture analysis to assess structural modifications induced by radiotherapy. In: Conference proceedings : annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2015, pp 5219–5222. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2015.7319568

  38. Teshima K, Murakami R, Yoshida R, Nakayama H, Hiraki A, Hirai T, Nakaguchi Y, Tsujita N, Tomitaka E, Furusawa M, Yamashita Y, Shinohara M (2012) Histopathological changes in parotid and submandibular glands of patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy for oral cancer. J Radiat Res 53(3):492–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. van Dijk LV, Brouwer CL, van der Schaaf A, Burgerhof JG, Beukinga RJ, Langendijk JA, Sijtsema NM, Steenbakkers RJ (2016) CT image biomarkers to improve patient-specific prediction of radiation-induced xerostomia and sticky saliva. Radiother Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nardone V, Tini P, Nioche C, Biondi M, Sebaste L, Mazzei MA, Banci Buonamici F, Pirtoli L (2016) Texture analysis of parotid gland as a predictive factor of radiation induced xerostomia: a subset analysis. Radiother Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. van Dijk LV, Langendijk JA, Sijtsema NM, Steenbakkers RJHM (2017) Reply letter to “Texture analysis of parotid gland as a predictive factor of radiation induced xerostomia: a subset analysis”. Radiother Oncol 122(2):322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fiorino C, Rizzo G, Scalco E, Broggi S, Belli ML, Dell’Oca I, Dinapoli N, Ricchetti F, Rodriguez AM, Di Muzio N, Calandrino R, Sanguineti G, Valentini V, Cattaneo GM (2012) Density variation of parotid glands during IMRT for head-neck cancer: correlation with treatment and anatomical parameters. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 104(2):224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Beetz I, Schilstra C, Burlage FR, Koken PW, Doornaert P, Bijl HP, Chouvalova O, Leemans CR, de Bock GH, Christianen ME, van der Laan BF, Vissink A, Steenbakkers RJ, Langendijk JA (2012) Development of NTCP models for head and neck cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for xerostomia and sticky saliva: the role of dosimetric and clinical factors. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 105(1):86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding has been provided for this Work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerio Nardone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nardone, V., Tini, P., Nioche, C. et al. Texture analysis as a predictor of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck patients undergoing IMRT. Radiol med 123, 415–423 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0850-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0850-7

Keywords

Navigation