Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

320-row coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with automatic exposure control (AEC): effect of 100 kV versus 120 kV on image quality and dose exposure

  • CARDIAC RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the impact of a 100 kV tube voltage protocol to 120 kV in terms of image quality and radiation dose by a 320 row coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with automatic exposure control (AEC).

Materials and methods

Using a propensity matched analysis we compared a group of 135 patients scanned using a 100 kV tube voltage protocol with a group of 135 subjects scanned employing a 120 kV tube voltage setting. In all subjects the heart rate (HR) was <65 bpm and all CT scans were acquired using a prospective ECG gating and AEC strategy. Mean effective radiation dose and subjective and objective (Noise or N, signal to noise ratio or SNR, contrast to noise ratio or CNR) image quality, were evaluated. Subjective quality was assessed by two experienced radiologists using a 5-point scale (0: non diagnostic—4: excellent) using the 15-segment American Heart Association (AHA) coronary artery classification.

Results

Mean effective dose and noise were non significantly different between the two groups: mean effective dose was 2.89 ± 0.7 mSv in the 100 kV group and 2.80 ± 0.57 mSv in the 120 kV group (p = 0.25) while noise was 28.9 ± 3.3 in the 120 kV group and 29.05 ± 3.6 in the 100 kV group (p = 0.72). Both SNR and CNR were significantly higher in the 100 kV group than in the 120 kV group. This data agrees with the evidence that subjective quality was significantly higher in the 100 kV group in the middle and distal segmental classes.

Conclusion

Our study shows that, in using a 320 row CCTA with AEC strategy it is better to employ a 100 kV tube voltage protocol because compared to 120 kV tube voltage setting, it appears to significantly improve both subjective and objective image quality without decreasing the mean effective radiation dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K, Gillespie C, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho PM, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott MM, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino M, Nichol G, Roger VL, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J, American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee (2010) Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 121(7):948–954. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298(3):317–23

  3. Di Cesare E, Gennarelli A, Di Sibio A, Felli V, Splendiani A, Gravina GL, Barile A, Masciocchi C (2014) Assessment of dose exposure and image quality in coronary angiography performed by 640-slice CT: a comparison between adaptive iterative and filtered back-projection algorithm by propensity analysis. Radiol Med 119(8):642–649. doi:10.1007/s11547-014-0382-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Cesare E, Carbone I, Carriero A, Centonze M, De Cobelli F, De Rosa R, Di Renzi P, Esposito A, Faletti R, Fattori R, Francone M, Giovagnoni A, La Grutta L, Ligabue G, Lovato L, Marano R, Midiri M, Natale L, Romagnoli A, Russo V, Sardanelli F, Cademartiri F; Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) (2012) Clinical indications for cardiac computed tomography. From the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM). Rad Med 117(6):901–938

  5. Di Cesare E, Gennarelli A, Di Sibio A, Felli V, Splendiani A, Gravina GL, Masciocchi C (2015). Image quality and radiation dose of single heartbeat 640-slice coronary CT angiography: A comparison between patients with chronic Atrial Fibrillation and subjects in normal sinus rhythm by propensity analysis. Eur J Radiol 84(4): 631–636. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.035

  6. Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ, Ye SJ, Park CM, Chun EJ, Im JG (2008) Radiation dose modulationtechniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 28(5):1451–1459. doi: 10.1148/rg.285075075

  7. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB (1975). A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51(4 Suppl):5–40

  8. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, Taylor C, Dunning A, Earls JP (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(3):649–654. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park EA, Lee W, Kim KW, Kim KG, Thomas A, Chung JW, Park JH (2012) Iterative reconstruction of dual-source coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(7):1775–1786. doi:10.1007/s10554-011-0004-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chun EJ, Lee W, Choi YH, Koo BK, Choi SI, Jae HJ, Kim HC, So YH, Chung JW, Park JH (2008) Effects of nitroglycerin on the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(1):86–92. doi: 10.1097/rct.0b013e318059befa

  11. Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M, Muschiol G, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2011) Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1081–1087.doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9756-3

  12. Yoo RE, Park EA, Lee W, Shim H, Kim YK, Chung JW, Park JH (2013) Image quality of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(3):669–676. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0113-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(3):764–771. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2397

  14. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG et al (2004). European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography. Funded by the European Commission; EUR 16262 EN

  15. Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127(8 Pt 2):757–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. EducPsycholMeas 20:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, Schoemig A, Hausleiter J (2009) Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the protection I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(8):940–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S (2008) Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. EurRadiol 18(9):1809–1817

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang C, Zhang Z, Yan Z, Xu L, Yu W, Wang R (2011) 320-row CT coronary angiography: effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1059–1068. doi:10.1007/s10554-010-9754-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Baumuller S, Plass A, Genoni M, Marincek B, Leschka S (2008) Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source ct: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters. Eur J Radiol 68(3):385–391. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blankstein R, Bolen MA, Pale R, Murphy MK, Shah AB, Bezerra HG, Sarwar A, Rogers IS, Hoffmann U, Abbara S, Cury RC, Brady TJ (2011) Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:579–586. doi:10.1007/s10554-010-9683-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Szucs-Farkas Z, Verdun FR, von Allmen G, Mini RL, Vock P (2008) Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study. Invest Radiol 43(6):374–381. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181690042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA et al (2006) Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W430–W433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. LaGrutta L, Galia M, Gentile G et al (2013) Comparison of iodinated contrast media for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque attenuation values by CT coronary angiography: observations in an ex vivo model. Br J Radiol 86:20120238. doi:10.1259/bjr.20120238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Palumbo A et al (2007) Imaging techniques for the vulnerable coronary plaque. Radiol Med. 112(5):637–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Makaryus JN, Makaryus AN (2009) Coronary calcification: Achilles’ heel in the assessment for coronary artery disease in patients with symptomatic angina? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(8): 855–857. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9535-1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy

    Ernesto Di Cesare, Antonio Gennarelli, Alessandra Di Sibio, Valentina Felli, Marco Perri, Alessandra Splendiani, Giovanni Luca Gravina, Antonio Barile & Carlo Masciocchi

Authors
  1. Ernesto Di Cesare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Gennarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandra Di Sibio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Valentina Felli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marco Perri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alessandra Splendiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Giovanni Luca Gravina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Antonio Barile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carlo Masciocchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Di Cesare.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Cesare, E., Gennarelli, A., Di Sibio, A. et al. 320-row coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with automatic exposure control (AEC): effect of 100 kV versus 120 kV on image quality and dose exposure. Radiol med 121, 618–625 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0643-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0643-4

Keyword

Search

Navigation