Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MDCT in diagnosing acute aortic syndromes: reviewing common and less common CT findings

Utilizzo della TC multidetettore nella diagnosi delle sindromi aortiche a cute: revisione dei segni TC più e meno comuni

  • Vascular and Interventional Radiology / Radiologia Vascolare e Interventistica
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nontraumatic acute thoracic aortic syndromes (AAS) describe a spectrum of life-threatening aortic pathologies with significant implications on diagnosis, therapy and management. In this context, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the gold standard due to its intrinsic diagnostic value; its performance approaches 100% sensitivity and specificity, and it is accepted as a first-line modality for suspected acute aortic disease. MDCT allows early recognition and characterisation of acute aortic syndromes as well as the presence of any associated complications — findings that are essential for optimising treatment and improving clinical outcomes. Although classic CT findings have long been known, other unusual signs are continually reported in the medical literature. We reviewed the classic and less common CT findings, correlating them with pathophysiology, timing and management options, to achieve a definite and timely diagnostic and therapeutic definition.

Riassunto

Di recente sistematizzazione, le sindromi aortiche acute rappresentano uno spettro di condizioni patologiche assai temibili per le notevoli implicazioni diagnostiche, terapeutiche e gestionali. In questo contesto, la tomografia computerizzata multidetettore (TCMD) è attualmente il gold standard per il suo intrinseco valore diagnostico, con sensibilità e specificità vicine al 100%, e costituisce la tecnica di imaging di scelta per sospetta patologia aortica acuta. La TCMD consente il riconoscimento precoce e la caratterizzazione delle sindromi aortiche acute, nonché la presenza di eventuali complicanze associate, con risultati essenziali per ottimizzare il trattamento e migliorare la prognosi. La semeiotica TC classica è nota da tempo, costituita da alcuni segni frequenti ed altri certamente più insoliti. Lo scopo di questo lavoro è rivedere la semeiotica classica e soprattutto evidenziare gli aspetti TC meno frequenti, correlandoli alla fisiopatologia, al timing e alle opzioni gestionali al fine di raggiungere una più precisa e tempestiva definizione diagnostica e terapeutica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. Vilacosta I, San Ramon JA (2001) Acute aortic syndrome. Heart 85:265–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Romano L, Pinto A, Gagliardi N (2007) Multidetector-row CT evaluation of nontraumatic acute thoracic aortic syndromes. Radiol Med 112:1–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation 121:e266–e369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Elefteriades JA (1999) Pathologic variants of thoracic aortic dissections: Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers and intramural hematomas. Cardiol Clin 17:637–657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sebastia C, Pallisa E, Quiroga S et al (1999) Aortic dissection: diagnosis and follow-up with helical CT. Radiographics 19:45–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Castaner E, Andreu M, Gallardo X et al (2003) CT in nontraumatic acute thoracic aortic disease: typical and atypical features and complications. Radiographics 23(Spec No):S93–S110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saadi EK (2010) Multidetector computed tomography scanning is still the gold standard for diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes. ICVTS 11:359

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith AD, Schoenhagen P (2008) CT imaging for acute aortic syndrome. Clev Clin J Med 75:7–9. DOI 10.3949/ ccjm.75.1.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McMahon MA, Squirrell CA (2010) Multidetector CT of aortic dissection: a pictorial review. Radiographics 30:445–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salvolini L, Renda P, Fiore D et al (2008) Acute aortic syndromes: role of multidetector row CT. Eur J Radiol 65:350–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamilton MCK, Nightingale AK, Masey S et al (2010) A case report of a normal aorta misdiagnosed as type A dissection by modern multidetector computed tomography. Eur Radiol 20:1856–1858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson PT, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2010) Aortic valve and ascending thoracic aorta: evaluation with isotropic MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1072–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raptopoulos VD, Boiselle PB, Michailidis N et al (2006) MDCT angiography of acute chest pain: evaluation of ECG-gated and nongated techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:S346–S356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Savino G, Herzog C, Costello P, Schoepf UJ (2006) 64 slice cardiovascular CT in the emergency department: concepts and first experiences. Radiol Med 111:481–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones MR (2009) The imaging of acute chest pain with multidetector computed tomography. Imaging 21:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel PD, Arora RR (2008) Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of aortic dissection. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2:439–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Urbania TH, Hope MD, Huffaker SD, Reddy GP (2009) Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of acute chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomog 3(Suppl 1):S13–S22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stillman AE, Oudkerk M, Ackerman M et al (2007) Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:2196–207

    Google Scholar 

  19. LePage MA, Quint LE, Sonnad SS et al (2001) Aortic dissection: CT features that distinguish true lumen from false lumen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:207–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee D, Williams D, Abrams G (1997) The dissected aorta. II. Differentiation of the true from the false lumen with intravascular US. Radiology 203:32–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Williams DM, Joshi A, Dake MD et al (1994) Aortic cobwebs: an anatomic marker identifying the false lumen in aortic dissection — imaging and pathologic correlation. Radiology 190:167–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ledbetter S, Stuk JL, Kaufman JA (1999) Helical (spiral) CT in the evaluation of emergent thoracic aortic syndromes. Radiol Clin North Am 37:575–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rubin GD (1997) Helical CT angiography of the thoracic aorta. J Thorac Imaging 12:128–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kazerooni EA, Bree RL, Williams DM (1992) Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta: evaluation with CT and distinction from aortic dissection. Radiology 183:759–765

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee WMM, Wong OF, Fung HT (2009) Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer — an increasingly recognized entity of the acute aortic syndrome: case report and literature review. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 16:246–251

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chughtai A, Kazerooni EA (2007) CT and MRI of acute thoracic cardiovascular emergencies. Crit Care Clin 23:835–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho KR, Stanson AW, Potter DD et al (2004) Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the descending thoracic aorta and arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1393–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Title RS, Harper K, Nelson E et al (2005) Observer performance in assessing anemia on thoracic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1240–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morita S, Ueno E, Masukawa A et al (2010) Hyperattenuating signs at unenhanced CT indicating acute vascular disease. Radiographics 30:111–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Demos TC, Posniak HV, Churchill RJ (1986) Detection of the intimal flap of aortic dissection on unenhanced CT images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:601–603

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. New PF, Aronow S (1976) Attenuation measurements of whole blood and blood fractions in computed tomography. Radiology 121:635–640

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Batra P, Bigoni B, Manning J et al (2000) Pitfalls in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection at CT angiography. Radiographics 20:309–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nelsen KM, Spizarny DL, Kastan DJ (1994) lntimointimal intussusception in aortic dissection: CT Diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:813–814

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Orrit J, Kalangos A, Trindade PT, Christenson JT (2003) Circumferential dissection with intimal intussusception: an unusual case acute of aortic type A dissection. Cardiovasc Surg 11:173–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. DeBakey ME, Lawrie G (1984) Intimal intussusception: unusual complication of dissecting aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 1:566–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kastan DJ, Sharma AP, Keith F et al (1988) Intimointimal intussusception: an unusual presentation of aortic dissection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151:603–604

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Reitknecht FL, Bhayana JN, Lajos TZ (1988) Circumferential intimal tear causing obstruction of the aortic arch: an unusual complication of aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 46:100–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Touati G, Carmi D, Trojette F et al (2003) Author’s reply: Intimo-intimal intussusception: a rare clinical form of aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shiau MC, Godoy MCB, de Groot PM, Ko JP (2010) Thoracic aorta: acute syndromes. App Radiol 39:6–16

    Google Scholar 

  40. Macura KJ, Szarf G, Fishman EK et al (2003) Role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of acute aortic syndromes. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 24:232–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kussman BD, Geva T, McGowan FX (2004) Cardiovascular causes of airway compression. Paediatr Anaesth 14:60–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kimura-Hayama ET, Meléndez G, Mendizábal AL et al (2010) Uncommon congenital and acquired aortic diseases: role of multidetector CT angiography. Radiographics 30:79–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shuford WH, Sybers RG (1974) The aortic arch and its malformations. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  44. Atkin GK, Grieve PP, Vattipally VR et al (2007) The surgical management of aortic root vessel anomalies presenting in adult. Ann Vasc Surg 21:525–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schlesinger AE, Krishnamurthy R, Sena LM et al (2005) Incomplete double aortic arch with atresia of the distal left arch: distinctive imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1634–1639

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dillman JR, Yarram SG, D’Amico AR et al (2008) Interrupted aortic arch: spectrum of MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1467–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ann KS, Yong HS, Lee JW et al (2007) Right circumflex retroesophageal aortic arch with coarctation of a highpositioned right arch. Pediatr Radiol 37:584–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Macura KJ, Corl FM, Fishman EK et al (2003) Pathogenesis in acute aortic syndromes: aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic aortic ulcer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:309–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kadir S (1986) Arteriography of the thoracic aorta. In: Kadir S (ed) Diagnostic angiography. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 124–171

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ishikawa S, Hasegawa T, Fuse K et al (1995) Three-channeled aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 60:1816–1818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. McReynolds RA, Shin MS, Sims RD (1978) Three-channeled aortic dissection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 130:549–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ando M, Okita Y, Tagusari O et al (2000) Surgery in three-channeled aortic dissection. A 31-patient review. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 48:339–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Williams DM, Cronin P, Dasika N et al (2006) Aortic branch artery pseudoaneurysms accompanying aortic dissection. Part I. Pseudoaneurysm anatomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:765–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu MT, Wang YC, Huang YL et al (2011) Intramural blood pools accompanying aortic intramural hematoma: CT appearance and natural course. Radiology 258:705–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Williams DM, Cronin P, Dasika N et al (2006) Aortic branch artery pseudoaneurysms accompanying aortic dissection. Part II. Distinction from penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:773–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Song JK, Yim JH, Ahn JM et al (2009) Outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic intramural hematoma. Circulation 120:2046–2052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chao CP, Walker TG, Kalva SP (2009) Natural history and CT appearances of aortic intramural hematoma. Radiographics 29:791–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Welch TJ, Stanson AW, Sheedy PF et al (1990) Radiologic evaluation of penetrating aortic atherosclerotic ulcer. Radiographics 10:675–685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Sueyoshi E, Matsuoka Y, Imada T et al (2002) New development of an ulcerlike projection in aortic intramural hematoma: CT evaluation. Radiology 224:536–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Williams DM, Lee DY, Hamilton BH et al (1997) The dissected aorta. Part III. Anatomy and radiologic diagnosis of branch-vessel compromise. Radiology 203:37–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Bhalla S, West OC (2005) CT of nontraumatic thoracic aortic emergencies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26:281–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Willoteaux S, Lions C, Gaxotte V et al (2004) Imaging of aortic dissection by helical computed tomography (CT). Eur Radiol 14:1999–2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gaxotte V, Cocheteux B, Haulon S et al (2003) Relationship of intimal flap postition to endovascular treatment of malperfusion syndromes in aortic dissection. J Endovasc Ther 10:719–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Scaglione.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valente, T., Rossi, G., Lassandro, F. et al. MDCT in diagnosing acute aortic syndromes: reviewing common and less common CT findings. Radiol med 117, 393–409 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0747-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0747-9

Keywords

Parole chiave

Navigation