Abstract
Purpose
This study was done to evaluate the feasibility, sensitivity and specificity of 64-slice computed tomography (CT) in identifying haemodynamically significant (>50%) coronary artery stenoses in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by correlating the CT findings with the clinical event and data provided by conventional coronary angiography (CCA).
Materials and methods
Sixty-four patients (38 men and 26 women; mean age 65 years; range±10 years) presenting to our hospital’s emergency department with a clinical suspicion of ACS were studied with 64-slice CT followed by CCA within 24 h of arrival.
Results
Two patients (3.1%) were excluded from the analysis due to artefacts. Per-patient analysis in the remaining 62 patients identified 24 cases (38.7%) of negative CT findings (no stenoses or stenoses <50%), 35 cases of positive CT findings (56.4%) with identification of the culprit lesion, two cases in which the culprit lesion was not identified and one patient with unconfirmed stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity were 94.6% and 96%, respectively. Per-vessel analysis (186 vessels) revealed 17 non-evaluable vessels (9.1%) due to motion artefacts, 61 vessels (32.8%) with stenosis >50%, seven overestimated vessels (3.7%) due to extensive calcifications, three vessels (1.6%) with underestimated stenosis and 98 vessels (52.6%) without stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity were 95.3% and 93.3%, respectively.
Conclusions
In this type of emergency, coronary CT angiography could lead to considerably lower healthcare costs by identifying patients without coronary disease and allowing immediate discharge without any need for further diagnostic procedures.
Riassunto
Obiettivo
Scopo di questo lavoro è stato valutare fattibilità, sensibilità e specificità della tomografia computerizzata (TC)-volumetrica a 64 strati nell’identificazione di stenosi emodinamicamente significative (>50%) delle arterie coronarie in soggetti con sospetta sindrome coronarica acuta (SCA), correlando il reperto TC con l’evento clinico del paziente e confrontando successivamente i dati ottenuti con quelli della coronarografia convenzionale (CC).
Materiali e metodi
Sessantaquattro pazienti (38 maschi e 26 femmine, età 65±10 anni) pervenuti presso il Pronto Soccorso (PS) del nostro policlinico universitario con sospetta SCA sono stati sottoposti a TC-volumetrica a 64strati e a successiva CC entro 24 ore dalla presentazione in PS.
Risultati
Due pazienti (3,1%) sono stati totalmente esclusi per artefatti. L’analisi per paziente dei rimanenti 62 ha visto 24 pazienti (38,7%) negativi allo studio TC (stenosi assenti o <50%), 35 pazienti (56,4%) positivi, con identificazione della lesione culprit, 2 pazienti dove non è stato possibile identificare la lesione culprit ed 1 paziente con stenosi non confermata; sensibilità e specificità sono risultate del 94,6% e del 96%. L’analisi globale per coronaria (186 vasi) ha evidenziato 17 vasi (9,1% non valutabili per artefatti da movimento, 61 vasi (32,8%) con stenosi>50%, 7 vasi (3,7%) sovrastimati per presenza di estese calcificazioni, 3 vasi (1,6%) sottostimati circa la significatività della stenosi e 98 vasi (52,6%) privi di stenosi. I valori della sensibilità e della specificità sono risultati del 95,3% e del 93,3%.
Conclusioni
L’utilizzo della coronaro-TC nella pratica clinica, in questo tipo di emergenze, potrebbe incidere in maniera ragguardevole sui costi del Sistema Sanitario, stratificando i pazienti privi di patologia coronarica o di altra patologia e consentendone la dimissione in tempi immediati, senza necessità di ulteriori indagini diagnostiche.
Similar content being viewed by others
References/Bibliografia
McCaig LF, Burt CW (2005) National hospital ambulatory medical care survey 2003. Emergency department summary:advance data from vital and health statistics, no. 358. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville
Olivetti L, Mazza G, Volpi D et al (2006) Multislice CT in emergency room management of patients with chest pain and medium-low probability of acute coronary syndrome. Radiol Med 111:1054–1063
Erhardt L, Herlitz J, Bossaert L et al (2002) Task force on the management of chest pain. Eur Heart J 23:1153–1176
Hamm CW, Bertrand M, Braunwald E (2001) Acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: implementation of new guidelines. Lancet 358:1533–1538
White CS, Kuo D (2007) Chest pain in the emergency department: role of multidetector CT. Radiology 245:672–681
Nikolaou K, Flohr R, Knez A et al (2004) Advances in cardiac CT imaging: 64-slice scanner. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:535–540
Fox KA, Goodman SG, Klein W et al (2002) Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the global registry of acute coronary events (grace). Eur Heart J 23:1177–1189
Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenosis by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively elettrocardiographycally-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103:2535–2538
Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599–603
Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A et al (2004) Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 25:1043–1048
Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123–127
Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK et al (2005) Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector ct with 16 × 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J 26:1978–1986
Cademartiri F, Romano M, Seitun S et al (2008) Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery disease in a population with suspected ischaemic heart disease using CT coronary angiography: correlations with cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation. Radiol Med 113:363–372
Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo A et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low-to-intermediate risk. Radiol Med 112:969–981
Deetjen AG, Conradi G, Mollmann S et al (2007) Diagnostic value of the 16 row multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis in comparison to invasive coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol 30:118–123
Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 115:1762–1768
Musto C, Simon P, Nicol E et al (2007) 64-multislice computed tomography in consecutive patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease: initial single center experience. Int J Cardiol 114:90–97
Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F et al (2006) Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 114:2251–2260
Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2007) 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with non-st elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart 93:1386–1392
Shishehbor M, Lauer M, Singh I et al (2007) In unstable angina or non-st-segment acute coronary syndrome, should patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergo multivessel or culprit-only-stenting? J Am Coll Cardiol 49:849–854
Iriart X, Brunot S, Coste P et al (2007) Early characterization of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multidetector computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound. Eur Radiol 17:2581–2588
Coles DR, Wilde P, Oberhoff M et al (2007) Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients admitted with a suspected acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23:603–614
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romagnoli, A., Martuscelli, E., Sperandio, M. et al. Role of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Radiol med 115, 341–353 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0482-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0482-7