Skip to main content
Log in

Catch Me If You Can: A Spatial Model for a Brake-Driven Gene Drive Reversal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Population management using artificial gene drives (alleles biasing inheritance, increasing their own transmission to offspring) is becoming a realistic possibility with the development of CRISPR-Cas genetic engineering. A gene drive may, however, have to be stopped. “Antidotes” (brakes) have been suggested, but have been so far only studied in well-mixed populations. Here, we consider a reaction–diffusion system modeling the release of a gene drive (of fitness \(1-a\)) and a brake (fitness \(1-b\), \(b\le a\)) in a wild-type population (fitness 1). We prove that whenever the drive fitness is at most 1/2 while the brake fitness is close to 1, coextinction of the brake and the drive occurs in the long run. On the contrary, if the drive fitness is greater than 1/2, then coextinction is impossible: the drive and the brake keep spreading spatially, leaving in the invasion wake a complicated spatiotemporally heterogeneous genetic pattern. Based on numerical experiments, we argue in favor of a global coextinction conjecture provided the drive fitness is at most 1/2, irrespective of the brake fitness. The proof relies upon the study of a related predator–prey system with strong Allee effect on the prey. Our results indicate that some drives may be unstoppable and that if gene drives are ever deployed in nature, threshold drives, that only spread if introduced in high enough frequencies, should be preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Depending on the construct, the brake could just convert a drive without affecting its effect on fitness (b close to a, \(b \le a\)), or at the other extreme the brake could carry a cargo gene restoring wild-type fitness (b close to 0).

  2. This is merely for algebraic convenience, and the general case will be discussed below in Sect. 4.2.

  3. With late gene conversion (typically in the germline), an \(\mathrm{OD}\)-born individual would have the fitness of an \(\mathrm{OD}\). In both cases though, only D gametes are produced by this individual.

  4. We actually observed that the extinction threshold is larger than a but smaller than 1 (Fig. 5). Nevertheless, the case \(b>a\) is beyond the scope of our assumptions and does not correspond to an relevant case in the context of the biological problem.

  5. Although this is indeed the main idea, it turns out that technical obstacles arise and therefore we will also show in the first step that v becomes uniformly smaller than a constant smaller than 1.

References

  • Barton NH, Turelli M (2011) Spatial waves of advance with bistable dynamics: cytoplasmic and genetic analogues of Allee effects. Am Nat 178(3):E48–E75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaghton A, Beaghton PJ, Burt A (2016) Gene drive through a landscape: reaction–diffusion models of population suppression and elimination by a sex ratio distorter. Theor Popul Biol 108:51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing W, Luo L, Gao XJ (2016) Cas9-triggered chain ablation of cas9 as a gene drive brake. Nat Biotechnol 34:137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deredec A, Burt A, Godfray HCJ (2008) The population genetics of using homing endonuclease genes in vector and pest management. Genetics 179(4):2013–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducrot A, Giletti T, Matano H (2019) Spreading speeds for multidimensional reaction-diffusion systems of the prey–predator type. arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1907.02592

  • Eaton JW, Bateman D, Hauberg S, Wehbring R (2019) GNU Octave version 5.1.0 manual: a high-level interactive language for numerical computations. https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v5.1.0/

  • Engineering National Academies of Sciences and Medicine (2016) Gene drives on the horizon: advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

  • Esvelt KM, Gemmell NJ (2017) Conservation demands safe gene drive. PLoS Biol 15(11):1–8 11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esvelt KM, Smidler AL, Catteruccia F, Church GM (2014) Emerging technology: concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations. eLife 3:e03401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fife PC, McLeod JB (1977) The approach of solutions of nonlinear diffusion equations to travelling front solutions. Arch Ration Mech Anal 65(4):335–361

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A, Abbott KC, Cuddington K, Francis T, Gellner G, Lai YC, Morozov A, Petrovskii S, Scranton K, Zeeman ML (2018) Transient phenomena in ecology. Science 361(6406):eaat6412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat6412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov A, Petrovskii S, Li B-L (2004) Bifurcations and chaos in a predator–prey system with the Allee effect. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271(1546):1407–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagylaki T (1975) Conditions for the existence of clines. Genetics 80(3):595–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble C, Adlam B, Church GM, Esvelt KM, Nowak MA (2018) Current CRISPR gene drive systems are likely to be highly invasive in wild populations. eLife 7:e33423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovskii SV, Morozov AY, Venturino E (2002) Allee effect makes possible patchy invasion in a predator-prey system. Ecol Lett 5(3):345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rode NO, Estoup A, Bourguet D, Courtier-Orgogozo V, Débarre F (2019) Population management using gene drive: molecular design, models of spread dynamics and assessment of ecological risks. Conserv Genet 20:671–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H, Stone HA, Nelson DR (2017) Spatial gene drives and pushed genetic waves. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:8452–8457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unckless RL, Messer PW, Connallon T, Clark AG (2015) Modeling the manipulation of natural populations by the mutagenic chain reaction. Genetics 201(2):425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vella MR, Gunning CE, Lloyd AL, Gould F (2017) Evaluating strategies for reversing CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives. Sci Rep 7(1):11038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Shi J, Wei J (2011) Dynamics and pattern formation in a diffusive predator–prey system with strong Allee effect in prey. J Differ Equ 251(4–5):1276–1304

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger HF (1975) Invariant sets for weakly coupled parabolic and elliptic systems. Rend Mat 6(8):295–310 (Collection of articles dedicated to Mauro Picone on the occasion of his ninetieth birthday)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank three anonymous referees for valuable comments which lead to an improvement of the manuscript. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No. 639638). This work was supported by a public grant as part of the Investissement d’avenir Project, Reference ANR-11-LABX-0056-LMH, LabEx LMH, and ANR-14-ACHN-0003-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Léo Girardin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Weinberger’s Maximum Principle

Below is recalled the main tool of the proof of Theorem 1.2. For clarity, we temporarily get rid of all our notations and adopt the original ones from Weinberger (1975).

Theorem A.1

(Weak maximum principle) Let D be a \(C^{1,\nu }\) domain in \({\mathbb {R}}^n\) with \(\nu \in \left( 0,1\right) \), S be a closed convex subset of \({\mathbb {R}}^m\), \({\mathbf {f}}\left( {\mathbf {u}},x,t\right) \) be Lipschitz-continuous in \({\mathbf {u}}\in S\) and uniformly Hölder-continuous in \(x\in D\) and \(t\in \left[ 0,T\right] \), with the property that for any outward normal \({\mathbf {p}}\) at any boundary point \({\mathbf {u}}^\star \) of S,

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {p}}\cdot {\mathbf {f}}\left( {\mathbf {u}}^\star ,x,t\right) \le 0\text { for all }\left( x,t\right) \in D\times \left( 0,T\right] . \end{aligned}$$

Let

$$\begin{aligned} L=\frac{\partial }{\partial t}-\sum _{i,j=1}^n a^{ij}\left( x,t\right) \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x_i \partial x_j} -\sum _{i=1}^n b_i\left( x,t\right) \frac{\partial }{\partial x_i} \end{aligned}$$

be uniformly parabolic with coefficients uniformly Hölder-continuous with Hölder exponent greater than \(\frac{1}{2}\).

If \({\mathbf {u}}\) is any solution in \(D\times \left( 0,T\right] \) of the system

$$\begin{aligned} Lu_{\alpha }=f_{\alpha }\left( {\mathbf {u}},x,t\right) \text { for }\alpha =1,2,\dots ,m \end{aligned}$$

which is continuous in \(\overline{D}\times \left[ 0,T\right] \), and if the values of \({\mathbf {u}}\) on \(\overline{D}\times \left\{ 0\right\} \cup \partial D\times \left[ 0,T\right] \) are bounded and Hölder-continuous and lie in S, then \({\mathbf {u}}\left( x,t\right) \in S\) in \(D\times \left( 0,T\right] \).

Theorem A.2

(Strong maximum principle) Let D be an arbitrary domain in \({\mathbb {R}}^n\) and S be a closed convex subset of \({\mathbb {R}}^m\) such that every boundary point of S satisfies a slab condition. Let \({\mathbf {f}}\left( {\mathbf {u}},x,t\right) \) be Lipschitz-continuous in \({\mathbf {u}}\), and suppose that if \({\mathbf {p}}\) is any outward normal at a boundary point \({\mathbf {u}}^\star \), then

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {p}}\cdot {\mathbf {f}}\left( {\mathbf {u}}^\star ,x,t\right) \le 0\text { for all }\left( x,t\right) \in D\times \left( 0,T\right] . \end{aligned}$$

Let

$$\begin{aligned} L=\frac{\partial }{\partial t}-\sum _{i,j=1}^n a^{ij}\left( x,t\right) \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x_i \partial x_j} -\sum _{i=1}^n b_i\left( x,t\right) \frac{\partial }{\partial x_i} \end{aligned}$$

be locally uniformly parabolic, and let its coefficients be locally bounded.

If \({\mathbf {u}}\) is any solution in \(D\times \left( 0,T\right] \) of the system

$$\begin{aligned} Lu_{\alpha }=f_{\alpha }\left( {\mathbf {u}},x,t\right) \text { for }\alpha =1,2,\dots ,m \end{aligned}$$

with \({\mathbf {u}}\left( x,t\right) \in S\) and if \({\mathbf {u}}\left( x^\star ,t^\star \right) \in \partial S\) for some \(\left( x^\star ,t^\star \right) \in D\times \left( 0,T\right] \), then \({\mathbf {u}}\left( x,t\right) \in \partial S\) in \(D\times \left( 0,t^\star \right] \).

Appendix B: Numerical Scheme

The various numerical simulations presented earlier are all produced by the following Octave code or slight variants of it.

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Girardin, L., Calvez, V. & Débarre, F. Catch Me If You Can: A Spatial Model for a Brake-Driven Gene Drive Reversal. Bull Math Biol 81, 5054–5088 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-019-00668-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-019-00668-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation