Abstract
This paper explores the role and history of systems theory and thinking in the fields of instructional/educational technology and design. The foundations of ID/ET as fields are rich in behavioral, systematic, and positivist notions of process, but we assert that it is weaker in the reflective, thoughtful, deep and meaningful orientations. Woven into the history of the role of systems in ID/ET are connections to constructivism, learning sciences, qualitative research, holistic ontological and epistemic philosophy as foundations to the impact of systems theories on our field. Understanding systems theory histories without the broader contexts of the other similarly focused and highly influential movements in educational change keeps the perceptions within the field as unidimensional. A more complete and textured analysis of the history of systems theory and thinking is offered through the interdisciplinary lens of intersective, but heretofore rarely integrated, perspectives on related disciplines and their force upon the implementation of systems thinking and theories in our field. The ultimate assertion here is to push the envelope of the history of our field toward interpretive or anti-positivist boundaries.
Our purpose in this paper, however, goes beyond just history. While historical perspective is useful and important in and of itself, we are interested in a different kind of generativity. Specifically, we wish to begin to explore the edges of where we might go next. Ideally, the proper integration of systems theory within ID/ET can gradually move us toward anti-positivist approaches which we believe will then lead us out of the philosophical desert toward a form of ID/ET for human flourishing and profound living. With the foundations and backdrops of the history of systems theories including those mentioned above, we believe that the intellectual history can then feed a synthetic activity and a potential new direction. We believe that the recent work in profound learning can offer a new direction where we can see beyond our current milieu. We assert that Educational Technology, Instructional Design, Learning Sciences are all in a bit of a philosophical desert at present. A potential endpoint in profound learning and living can help to inform and expand the broader sense of systems thinking. This paper adds significantly to the theoretical discussions of systems theory and thinking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. W., & Adey, G. (1976). The positivist dispute in German sociology. London: Heinemann.
AECT (2019). Special issue in ETRD: Call for Papers. Retrieved June 5, 2020 from https://aect.org/news_manager.php?page=17359.
Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems Design of Education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
Banathy, B. H. (1992a). A systems view of education: Concepts and principles for effective practice. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
Banathy, B. H. (1992b). Comprehensive systems design in education: Building a design culture. Educational Technology, 22(3), 33–35.
Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social Systems in a Changing World. N.Y: Plenum.
Berry, W. (1983). Standing by words: Essays. San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1969). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.
Capra, F. (1975). The Tao of physics : An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and eastern mysticism. Berkeley: [New York]: Shambhala; Random House.
Carr, A. A. (1996). Distinguishing systemic from systematic. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 41(1), 16–20. Retrieved June 4, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/164920/.
Carr, A. A. (1997). User-design in the creation of human learning sys-tems.Educational. Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 5–22.
Checkland, P. B. (2001). Soft systems methodology. In J. Rosenhead & J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited. Chichester: Wiley.
Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21–29.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7–12.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233–252.
Habermas, J. (2015). Knowledge and human interests. John Wiley & Sons.
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 5–14.
Kozma, R. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 7–19.
Kroth, M., & Carr-Chellman, D. J. (2018). Preparing profound learners. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 30(3), 64–71.
Kulik, J., Kuliy, C.-L., & Bangert-Drowns, R. (1985). The importance of outcome studies: A reply to Clark. Educational Computing Systems, 1, 381–386.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Califórnia: SAGE Publication.
Luhmann, N. (1969). Modern system theories as a form of society-wide analysis. In German Sociology Day Late “Capitalism or Industrial Society?” (pp. 253–266). Stuttgart, Germany: Ferdinand Enke.
McLeod, S. A. (2018). Jean piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology, (June 06) Retrieved June 4, 2020 from https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html.
Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, Efficient and Engaging Instruction. San Frisco: Pfeiffer.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Park, H. J., & Kwean, H. J. (2010). An analysis of structural relationships between metacognition, flow, and mathematics creative problem solving ability. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 13(2), 205–224.
Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Reigeluth, C.M., & Garfinkle, R. (1994). Systemic change in education. Englewood Cliffs N.J: Educational Technology Publications.
Reiss, M., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. London: IoE Press.
Reiss, M. J., & White, J. (2014). An aims-based curriculum illustrated by the teaching of science in schools. Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 76–89.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
White, J. (2020). Introduction to An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. Academia.edu https://www.academia.edu/35323763/An_Aims-based_Curriculum_The_Significance_of_Human_Flourishing_for_Schools_2013_?email_work_card=abstract-read-more. .
White, J. (2006, April). The aims of school education. In curriculum, assessment and pedagogy: Beyond the ‘standards Agenda’ Conference at the IPPR 3rd April.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carr-Chellman, D.J., Carr-Chellman, A. Integrating Systems: the History of Systems from von Bertalanffy to Profound Learning. TechTrends 64, 704–709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00540-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00540-1