Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating Systems: the History of Systems from von Bertalanffy to Profound Learning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the role and history of systems theory and thinking in the fields of instructional/educational technology and design. The foundations of ID/ET as fields are rich in behavioral, systematic, and positivist notions of process, but we assert that it is weaker in the reflective, thoughtful, deep and meaningful orientations. Woven into the history of the role of systems in ID/ET are connections to constructivism, learning sciences, qualitative research, holistic ontological and epistemic philosophy as foundations to the impact of systems theories on our field. Understanding systems theory histories without the broader contexts of the other similarly focused and highly influential movements in educational change keeps the perceptions within the field as unidimensional. A more complete and textured analysis of the history of systems theory and thinking is offered through the interdisciplinary lens of intersective, but heretofore rarely integrated, perspectives on related disciplines and their force upon the implementation of systems thinking and theories in our field. The ultimate assertion here is to push the envelope of the history of our field toward interpretive or anti-positivist boundaries.

Our purpose in this paper, however, goes beyond just history. While historical perspective is useful and important in and of itself, we are interested in a different kind of generativity. Specifically, we wish to begin to explore the edges of where we might go next. Ideally, the proper integration of systems theory within ID/ET can gradually move us toward anti-positivist approaches which we believe will then lead us out of the philosophical desert toward a form of ID/ET for human flourishing and profound living. With the foundations and backdrops of the history of systems theories including those mentioned above, we believe that the intellectual history can then feed a synthetic activity and a potential new direction. We believe that the recent work in profound learning can offer a new direction where we can see beyond our current milieu. We assert that Educational Technology, Instructional Design, Learning Sciences are all in a bit of a philosophical desert at present. A potential endpoint in profound learning and living can help to inform and expand the broader sense of systems thinking. This paper adds significantly to the theoretical discussions of systems theory and thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. W., & Adey, G. (1976). The positivist dispute in German sociology. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • AECT (2019). Special issue in ETRD: Call for Papers. Retrieved June 5, 2020 from https://aect.org/news_manager.php?page=17359.

  • Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems Design of Education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1992a). A systems view of education: Concepts and principles for effective practice. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1992b). Comprehensive systems design in education: Building a design culture. Educational Technology, 22(3), 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social Systems in a Changing World. N.Y: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1983). Standing by words: Essays. San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. V. (1969). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.

  • Capra, F. (1975). The Tao of physics : An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and eastern mysticism. Berkeley: [New York]: Shambhala; Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. A. (1996). Distinguishing systemic from systematic. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 41(1), 16–20. Retrieved June 4, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/164920/.

  • Carr, A. A. (1997). User-design in the creation of human learning sys-tems.Educational. Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (2001). Soft systems methodology. In J. Rosenhead & J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2015). Knowledge and human interests. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroth, M., & Carr-Chellman, D. J. (2018). Preparing profound learners. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 30(3), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J., Kuliy, C.-L., & Bangert-Drowns, R. (1985). The importance of outcome studies: A reply to Clark. Educational Computing Systems, 1, 381–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Califórnia: SAGE Publication.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1969). Modern system theories as a form of society-wide analysis. In German Sociology Day Late “Capitalism or Industrial Society?” (pp. 253–266). Stuttgart, Germany: Ferdinand Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, S. A. (2018). Jean piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology, (June 06) Retrieved June 4, 2020 from https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html.

  • Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, Efficient and Engaging Instruction. San Frisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. J., & Kwean, H. J. (2010). An analysis of structural relationships between metacognition, flow, and mathematics creative problem solving ability. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 13(2), 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M., & Garfinkle, R. (1994). Systemic change in education. Englewood Cliffs N.J: Educational Technology Publications.

  • Reiss, M., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. London: IoE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J., & White, J. (2014). An aims-based curriculum illustrated by the teaching of science in schools. Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2020). Introduction to An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. Academia.edu https://www.academia.edu/35323763/An_Aims-based_Curriculum_The_Significance_of_Human_Flourishing_for_Schools_2013_?email_work_card=abstract-read-more. .

  • White, J. (2006, April). The aims of school education. In curriculum, assessment and pedagogy: Beyond the ‘standards Agenda’ Conference at the IPPR 3rd April.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davin J. Carr-Chellman.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carr-Chellman, D.J., Carr-Chellman, A. Integrating Systems: the History of Systems from von Bertalanffy to Profound Learning. TechTrends 64, 704–709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00540-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00540-1

Keywords

Navigation