Abstract
This exploratory research project characterised the degree of adoption of mobile learning devices among 149 fourth year pre-service teachers (PST) studying education. It also examined the impact of perceptions about possibilities and constraints in the adoption of mobile devices in schools. The findings reveal that pre-service teachers were generally at the fourth of a six-stage continuum of technological adoption that can be characterized as familiarity and confidence which was one level higher than academic staff. Some of those constraints appear to reside on equity issues, lack of mobile learning support resources, pedagogically unproductive use of mobile tools and student distractedness. Gender did not have a major impact on participants’ opinions but access to a mobile tablet did.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai, H. (2019). Preparing teacher education students to integrate mobile learning into elementary education. TechTrends, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00424-z.
Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 17–32.
Bei, L., & Simpson, E. (1995). The determinants of consumers' purchase decisions for recycled products: An application of acquisition-transaction utility theory. In F. Kardes & M. Sujan (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 257–261). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.
Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., Jasilek, S., Biddulph, J., Fenyvesi, K., Durning, L., & Rolls, L. (2018). The art of creating possibility spaces for fostering STEAM practices in primary education. In X. Du and T. Chemi (Eds.) Innovation and change in education cross-cultural perspectives special issue: Artsbased Methods in Education Across the World (pp. 245-279). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.37978.
Campbell, C. (2013). Pedagogies afforded by new technologies: The introduction of iPods in one secondary school. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 8(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.2013.8.3.169.
Christensen, R. (1997). Effect of technology integration on the attitudes of teachers and their students. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas. Available at http://courseweb.unt.edu/rhondac/research/dissert/index.htm. Accessed 31 Aug 2019.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Goos, M. E. & Bennison, A. (2007). Technology-enriched teaching of secondary mathematics: Factors influencing innovative practice. In J. Watson and K. Beswick, Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia. Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice, Wrest Point Hotel Casino, Hobart, TAS, (315–324). 2–6 July, 2007.
Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2008). Surveying the technology landscape: Teachers’ use of technology in secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 102–130.
Handal, B. (2015). Mobile learning makes learning free: Building conceptual, professional and institutional capacity. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Handal, B., & Cavanagh, M. (2011). Factors leading to the adoption of a learning technology: The case of graphics calculators. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 61(2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.974.
Handal, B., Chinnappan, M. & Herrington, T. (2004). Adopting graphics calculators in NSW. Proceedings of the 2 ndNational Conference on Graphing Calculators (pp. 29-43). University Sains Malaysia.Handal.pdf.
Handal, B., MacNish, J., & Petocz, P. (2013). Academics adopting mobile devices: The zone of free movement. In H. Carter, M. Gosper and J. Hedberg (Eds.), Electric Dreams. Proceedings ASCILITE 2013 Sydney. (pp.350–361). Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/sydney13/program/papers/Handal.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2019.
Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M. & Dave, K. (2014). Appraising maths apps using the TPACK model. 15th Australasian Computer Education Conference (pp. 169-187), Adelaide, South Australia.
Hwang, G., & Tsai, C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2011 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65–E70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x.
Kearney, M., Burden, K., Schuck, S., & Burke, P. (2019). Principles underpinning innovative mobile learning: Stakeholders’ priorities. TechTrends, 1–10.
Macquarie Dictionary. (2004). International English dictionary: Complete and unabridged edition. Sydney: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Merriam-Webster (2015). Merriam-Webster online dictionary. Last accessed on 30 March 2015 from: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dictionary. Accessed 31 Aug 2019.
Muijs, D. (2010). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016.
Russell, A. L. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: Naive adult email users. Computers & Education, 25(4), 173–178.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The sage handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–247). London: Sage.
Twyman, J. S., & Heward, W. L. (2018). How to improve student learning in every classroom now. International Journal of Educational Research, 87, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.007.
Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children's action. Chichester: Wiley.
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children's action: A theory of human development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Vázquez, J. P. G., Vargas, M. A. A., Ezkauriatza, M. G., Juarros, V. I. M., Corral, L. E. V., Espinoza, J. M. O., & Doolan, M. A. (2018). Instructional strategies and information technologies used for supporting the undergraduate mathematics teaching process: Scoping review protocol. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.05.002.
Vygotsky, L. (1935). Dinamika umstvennogo razvitiia shkol’nika v sviazi s obucheniem. In Umstvennoe razvitie detei v protsesse obucheniia. Moscow-Leningrad: Gosuchpedgiz.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John- Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Whalley, W. B., Mauchline, A. L., France, D., Park, J., & Welsh, K. (2018). The iPad six years on: Progress and problems for enhancing mobile learning with special reference to fieldwork education. In H. Crompton & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile Learning in Higher Education: Challenges in context (pp. 8–18). New York: Routledge.
Wong, L. H. (2012). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E19–E23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01245.x.
Zaichkowsky, J. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Handal, B., Campbell, C. & Perkins, T. Learning About Mobile Learning: Pre-Service Teachers’ Perspectives. TechTrends 63, 711–722 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00430-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00430-1