Abstract
Interactive learning is vital to schooled learning because it encourages and enables the exploration and application of knowledge. The difficulty of providing for this learning-based interaction among students who never meet in person has been a continuing concern in online education. This paper describes six different interactive structures (whole group discussions, break-out groups, show-and-tell, independent small groups, online conferences, and virtual poster sessions) developed to allow students in online courses to interact virtually face-to-face using free video conferencing programs and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each. Student response to these video conferencing structures in 18 fully online classes was overwhelmingly positive, based on data from anonymous end-of-course evaluations. Student comments emphasized increased engagement and enjoyment from being able to see and talk with each other in both large and small groups, and the value of the relationships and learning community they believed such interaction fostered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14.
Allen I. E., Seaman J. (2015) Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States, Boston, MA: Sloan consortium, Babson survey research group. Retrieved 12–30-16 from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradelevel.pdf.
Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2013). Tracing successful online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–41.
Bergman, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom. Eugene. In Or: ISTE.
Berrett, D. (2012). How "flipping" the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 12–30-16 from http://chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857/
Chaudhury, S. J. (2011). The lecture. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (128), 13–20.
Keengwe, J., Adjei-Boateng, E., & Diteeyont, W. (2013). Facilitating active social presence and meaningful interactions in online learning. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 597–607.
Kim, K. J., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. (2005). Online MBA students' perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 335–344.
Knapp, N. F., Pagnani, A. R, & O'Shea, B. P. (2013). "Flipping" an introductory educational psychology course for teachers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Lambert (2012). Twilight of the lecture. Harvard Magazine. Retrieved 12–30-16 from http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/03/twilight-of-the-lecture.
McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73–81.
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48.
National Institute of Education (1984). Involvement in learning: Realizing the potential of American higher education. Final report of the Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, US Dept. of Education.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
Roberts, T. S., & McInnerney, J. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 257–268.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, (Winter, 2012), 82-83.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2014). Guidelines for facilitating the development of learning communities in online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 220–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author, Dr. Nancy Knapp, declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Because only data from anonymous course evaluations that are public records were reported in this article, this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knapp, N.F. Increasing Interaction in a Flipped Online Classroom through Video Conferencing. TechTrends 62, 618–624 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0336-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0336-z