We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing Teacher Education with Simulations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As calls for accountability in our schools increase, teaching quality faces scrutiny and, often, criticism. These realities challenge teacher education programs to find new ways to ensure that their graduates will be effective in highly demanding work settings. In this article the authors draw on literature and practice examples to highlight ways that simulations can strengthen critical aspects of teacher preparation as teacher education programs look for ways to better equip their graduates for future challenges. Experience shows that simulations can support screening for program admission, practice for improving teaching and classroom management skills and development of teaching dispositions. Their potential is increasing as technological advances provide greater realism, distributed access and simulation applications for mobile devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi, S., & Trollip, S. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M., Coble, C., & Crowe, E. (2014). Building an evidence-based system for teacher preparation. Washington, DC: Teacher Preparation Analytics. Retrieved February 14, 2015 from https://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/building_an_evidence_based_system_for_teacher_preparation_201409151.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, S. E., & Freeburg, B. W. (2008). Family and consumer sciences pre-service teachers: impact of an early field experience[electronic version]. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 26(1), 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aten Intelligent Educational Systems Inc. (2015). Classroom teacher training 3D simulation. Durham, NC: Aten, Inc.. Retrieved from http://www.a10ed.com/explore/professional-development/classroom-teacher-training-3d-simulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiee, F., & Kaufman, D. (2014). Effectiveness of an online simulation for teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. doi:10.1177/0022487109348479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, G. M., & Scheuermann, B. K. (2014). Using virtual technology to enhance field experiences for pre-service special education teachers [electronic version]. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(3), 255–272. doi:10.1177/0888406414530413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulet, J. R. (2008). Summative assessment in medicine: the promise of simulation for high-stakes evaluation [electronic version]. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 1017–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00228.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, E. G., & Kendall, B. (2014). A review of computer simulations in teacher education [electronic version]. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(1), 3–12. doi:10.2190/ET.43.1.b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butvilofsky, S. A., Escamilla, K., Soltero-González, L., & Aragon, L. (2012). Promoting reflective teaching through simulation in a study in México program [electronic version]. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11(2), 197–212. doi:10.1177/1538192711435561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, L., Kervin, L., & Ferry, B. (2011). Enhancing the development of pre-service teacher professional identity via an online classroom simulation [electronic version]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 351–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I., & Lee, K. (2009). Designing and implementing a case-based learning environment for enhancing ill-structured problem solving: classroom management problems for prospective teachers [electronic version]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 99–129. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9089-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R., Knezek, G., Tyler-Wood, T., & Gibson, D. (2011). SimSchool: an online dynamic simulator for enhancing teacher preparation [electronic version]. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(2), 201–220. doi:10.1504/IJLT.2011.042649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crookall, D. (2010). Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline [electronic version]. Simulation and Gaming, 41(6), 898–920. doi:10.1177/1046878114559879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 310–314. doi:10.1177/0022487105285962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation [electronic version]. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deale, D., & Pastore, R. (2014). Evaluation of simSchool, an instructional simulation for pre-service teachers [electronic version]. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 197–219. doi:10.1080/07380569.2014.932650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning [electronic version]. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMuth, L. (2012). Teaching dispositions: Shared understandings for teacher preparation. Ed.D. dissertation. Retrieved March 1, 2015 from ProQuest Dissertations database (UMI 3532736).

  • Dieker, L. A., Rodruiguez, J. A., Lignugaris/Kraft, B., Hynes, M. C., & Hughes, C. E. (2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: current and future possibilities [electronic version]. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33. doi:10.1177/0888406413512683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotger, B. H. (2009). From a medicinal to educational context: implementing a signature pedagogy for enhanced parent–teacher communication [electronic version]. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 35(1), 93–94. doi:10.1080/02607470802587186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotger, B., & Alger, A. (2012). Challenging parent, challenged curricula: utilizing simulated interactions to enhance school leader preparation [electronic version]. Planning and Changing, 43(3/4), 344–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews, F. A., & Backdash, J. D. (2013). Simulation training in health care. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 8(1), 191–234. doi:10.1177/1557234X13492977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eduSIMS. (2015). What are Sims? Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University School of Education. Retrieved February 12, 2015 from http://edusims.syr.edu/what-are-sims/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppich, W., Howard, V., Vozenilek, J., & Curran, I. (2011). Simulation-based team training in healthcare [electronic version]. Simulation in Healthcare, 6(7 suppl.), s14–s19. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e318229f550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., Reiter, H. I., & Norman, G. R. (2004). An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview [electronic version]. Medical Education, 38(3), 314–326. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01776.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Cambourne, B., Turbill, J., Puglisi, S., Jonassen, D., et al. (2004). Online classroom simulation: the ‘next wave’ for pre-service teacher education? In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE conference (pp. 294–302). Perth, Western Australia: Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved March 11, 2013 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/ferry.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Hedberg, J. G., Turbill, J., Cambourne, B., & Jonassen, D. (2005). In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Communication (EdMedia) (pp. 3096–3103). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: learning from the past [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357–368. doi:10.1177/0022487114533800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaba, D. M. (2007). The future vision of simulation in healthcare [electronic version]. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2), 126–135. doi:10.1097/01.SIH.0000258411.38212.32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. (2007). SimSchool and the conceptual assessment framework. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: research & development frameworks (pp. 308–322). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. (2013). Assessing teaching skills with a mobile simulation. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(1), 4–10. doi:10.1080/21532974.2013.10784720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. & Halverson, B. (2004). Simulation as a framework for preservice assessment. In R. Ferdig et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 3322–3325). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Girod, G. R. (2002). Connecting teaching and learning: a handbook for teacher educators on teacher work sample methodology. Washington, DC: AACTE publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girod, M., & Girod, G. R. (2006). Exploring the efficacy of the cook school district simulation [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(5), 481–497. doi:10.1177/0022487106293742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod, M., & Girod, G. (2008). Simulation and the need for quality practice in teacher preparation [electronic version]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girod, G., Girod, M., & Denton, J. (2007). Lessons learned modeling “connecting teaching and learning”. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: research and development frameworks (pp. 206–222). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching [electronic version]. Education Next, 2(1), 50–55. Retrieved February 15, 2015 from http://educationnext.org/the-mystery-of-good-teaching/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Re-defining teaching, re-imagining teacher education [electronic version]. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (2014). Boosting teacher effectiveness. In C. E. Finn Jr. & R. Sousa (Eds.), What lies ahead for America’s children and their schools (pp. 23–35). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., Smithey, G., McAffey, H., & Weiner, C. (2006). Assessing candidate disposition for admission into teacher education: can just anyone teach? [electronic version]. Action in Teacher Education, 27(4), 72–80. doi:10.1080/01626620.2006.10463403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs, W. L., Youngblood, P., Harter, P. M., & Dev, P. (2008). Simulation for team training and assessment: case studies of online training with virtual worlds [electronic version]. World Journal of Surgery, 32(2), 161–170. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9354-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, C. M. (2006a). Teacher dispositions as predictors of good teaching [electronic version]. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas, 79(3), 117–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, C. M. (2006b). The assessment of teacher dispositions [electronic version]. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas, 79(6), 237–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixon, E., & So, H.-J. (2009). Technology’s role in field experiences for preservice teacher training [electronic version]. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 294–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, T. L., Bensfield, L. A., Sojka, S., & Schmitt, A. (2014). Multiple-patient simulations: guidelines and examples [electronic version]. Nurse Educator, 39(6), 311–315. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, A. C. (2012). Primary connections: simulating the classroom in initial teacher education [electronic version]. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 551–565. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9210-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Gordon, D. L., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28. doi:10.1080/01421590500046924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J., & Bridges, S. M. (2014). Educational technologies in problem-based learning in health sciences education: a systematic review [electronic version]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), e251–e269. doi:10.2196/jmir.3240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, K. Z., Gaunt, K., Ramachandran, R., & Pushkar, P. (2013). The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide No. 81. Part II: organisation & administration [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 35(9), e1447–e1463. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.818635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J., Kerr, K. A., & Pianta, R. C. (Eds.). (2014). Designing teacher evaluation systems: new guidance from the measures of effective teaching project. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D., & Ireland, A. (2015). The potential of simulation for teacher assessment. In N. Maynes & B. E. Hatt (Eds.), When the interview is not enough: examining new teacher hiring practices in the Canadian context. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association for Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanal, P., Vankipuram, A., Ashby, A., Vankipuram, M., Gupta, A., Drumm-Gurnee, D., et al. (2014). Collaborative virtual reality based advanced cardiac life support training simulator using virtual reality principles [electronic version]. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 51, 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. L., Lloyd, G. M., Arbagh, F., Gamson, D. A., McDonald, S. P., Nolan, J., Jr., et al. (2015). Taking stock in 2015 [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 3–6. doi:10.1177/0022487114561741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project. Retrieved March 1, 2015 from http://www.edschools.org/pdf/educating_teachers_report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston, D. P. (2012). Reconsidering university-based teacher education [electronic version]. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 14(1–2), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Hallinger, P., & Showanasai, P. (2014). Simulation-based learning in management education: a longitudinal quasi-experimental evaluation of instructional effectiveness [electronic version]. Journal of Management Development, 33(3), 218–244. doi:10.1108/JMD-11-2011-0115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (2012). Learning with technology: Theoretical foundations underpinning simulations in higher education. In M. Brown, M. Hartnett, & T. Stewart (Eds.), Future challenges, sustainable futures, proceedings Ascilite Wellington 2012, p. 582–586.

  • Maier, F. H., & Grössler, A. (2000). What are we talking about? - a taxonomy of computer simulations to support learning [electronic version]. System Dynamics Review, 16(2), 135–148. doi:10.1002/1099-1727(200022)16:2<135::AID-SDR193>3.0.CO;2-P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, M., Brazil, V., & Johnson, P. (2014). How we “breathed life” into problem-based learning cases using a mobile application [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 36(10), 849–852. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.886771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster University (2015). Standardized patient program. Retrieved March 10, 2015 from http://simulation.mcmaster.ca/spp.html.

  • McPherson, R., Tyler-Wood, T., Mcenturff, A., & Peak, P. (2011). Using a computerized classroom simulation to prepare pre-service teachers [electronic version]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(1), 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnick, D. (1990). Computer-based clinical simulation: state of the art [electronic version]. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 13(1), 104–120. doi:10.1177/016327879001300106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappano, L. (2011). Using research to predict great teachers. Harvard Education Letter, 27(3). Retrieved February 15, 2015 from http://hepg.org/hel-home/issues/27_3/helarticle/using-research-to-predict-great-teachers_501.

  • Pell, G., Fuller, R., Homer, M., & Roberts, T. (2010). How to measure the quality of the OSCE: a review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49 [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 32(10), 802–811. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.507716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? [electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C., & Fluck, A. (2014). Pre-service teacher’s perceptions of simSchool as preparation for inclusive education: a pilot study [electronic version]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 212–227. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2014.927825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D., & Marquis, J.-S. (2007). Distinguishing between games and simulations: a systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schools, C. (2015). Teaching fellowship application process. Boston, MA: Citizen Schools. Retrieved February 10, 2015 from http://www.citizenschools.org/careers/teaching-fellowship/application-process/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroffel, A. (2012). The use of in-basket exercises for the recruitment of advanced social service workers [electronic version]. Public Personnel Management, 41(1), 151–160. doi:10.1177/009102601204100108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., & Slavin, S. (2007). Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions [electronic version]. Academic Medicine, 82(1), 74–82. doi:10.1097/01.ACM.0000249963.93776.aa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford University (2014). Screening of international teaching assistants. Retrieved February 1, 2015 from https://web.stanford.edu/group/efs/tascreen.html.

  • Stearns, J. M., Ronald, K., Greenlee, T. B., & Crespy, C. T. (2003). Contexts for communication: teaching expertise through case-based in-basket exercises [electronic version]. Journal of Education for Business, 78(4), 213–219. doi:10.1080/08832320309598603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? a cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355. doi:10.1177/0022487111404241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturpe, D. A., & Schaivone, K. A. (2014). A primer for objective structured teaching exercises [electronic version]. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(5), 104. doi:10.5688/ajpe785104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambouris, E., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., Ryberg, T., Buus, L., Peristeras, V., et al. (2012). Enabling problem based learning through web 2.0 technologies: PBL 2.0 [electronic version]. Educational Technology and Society, 15(4), 238–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach for America (2015). The full-day interview. Retrieved March 1, 2015 from https://www.teachforamerica.org/why-teach-for-america/how-to-apply/preparation-tips.

  • Trowbridge, R. L., Snydman, L. K., Skolfield, J., Hafler, J., & Bing-You, R. G. (2011). A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of the objective structured teaching encounter [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 33(11), 893–903. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.577463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. F., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: current knowledge, recommendations, and priorities for the future. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved March 1, 2015 from https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Note

Limited portions of this article have been published as part of a discussion of simulations for teacher assessment in Canada, in Kaufman and Ireland (2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada, V5A 1S6

    David Kaufman & Alice Ireland

Authors
  1. David Kaufman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alice Ireland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Kaufman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaufman, D., Ireland, A. Enhancing Teacher Education with Simulations. TechTrends 60, 260–267 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0049-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0049-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation