Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using Nearpod in elementary guided reading groups

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A student teacher placed at a school with a high English Language Learner population used mini iPads, and an application called Nearpod, during guided reading instruction. Groups of students in a fourth grade classroom used this application. The students and the teacher were interviewed to determine the benefits and challenges of this approach. An analysis of data revealed that all of the students found this type of guided reading to be beneficial and motivating in learning the content presented through the application. Students also explained how they could transfer the knowledge gained into their independent work. The teacher discussed how it improved organization in a guided reading group, but how careful consideration and planning must be done to ensure the technology will work properly during guided reading. It is recommended that the Nearpod application be used in guided reading lessons because of its user-friendliness, ability to engage students, and monitor their progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avalos, M. A., Plasencia, A., Chavez, C., & Rascon, J. (2007). Modified guided reading: Gateway to English as a second language and literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 61(4), 318-329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. A., & James, K. E. (2008). Powerpointbased lectures in business education: An empirical investigation of student-perceived novelty and effectiveness. Business Communication Quarterly, 71(3), 277-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brien, D. O., & Voss, S. (2011). Reading multimodally: What is afforded? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 75-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadband, E. (2012). Should schools embrace “Bring your own device”? NEA Today. Retrieved from: http://neatoday.org/2012/07/19/should-schools-embracebring-your-own-device/

  • El Khoury, R. M., & Mattar, D. M. (2012). PowerPoint in accounting classrooms: Constructive or deconstructive? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(10), 240-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. (2013). Nearpod Gets 1.5M From NewSchools, Salesforce Exec to Bring its Mobile “Powerpoint on Steroids” to Classrooms. Aol Tech. Retrieved from; http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/21/nearpod-gets-1-5m-from-newschools-salesforce-exec-tobring-its-mobile-powerpoint-on-steroidsinto-the-classroom/

  • Fawson, P. C., & Reutzel, R. D. (2000). But I only have a basal: Implementing guided reading in the early grades. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 84-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good First Teaching for all Children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (2011). Mobile digital devices. Teacher Librarian, 39(1), 22-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, I. C., & Geist, E. A. (2012). A qualitative examination of social interaction during cooperative computer activities. Education, 133(2), 383-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iaquinta, A. (2006). Guided reading: A research-based response to the challenges of early reading instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(6), 413-418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karchmer-Klein, R., & Shinas, V. H. (2012). Principles for supporting new literacies in your classroom. The Reading Teacher, 65(5), 288-293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, L. C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in e-book reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 15-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan, B., Williams, K., Kennedy, E., & Tate, S. (2012). How use of an iPad facilitated reading improvement. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 56(3), 20-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantei, E. J. (2000). Using internet class notes and Powerpoint in the physical geography lecture: Comparing the success of computer technology with traditional teaching techniques. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 301-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson (2012). American families see tablets as playmate, teacher, and babysitter. Retrieved from: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2012/american-familiessee-tablets-as-playmate-teacher-andbabysitter.html

  • Pearson Foundation (2012). Survey on students and tablets. Retrieved from: http://www.pearsonfoundation.org/pr/20120314-new-survey-finds-dramatic-increase-intablet-ownership-among-college-studentsand-high-school-seniors.html

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On The Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Readinga-z (2013). Level O Book Features. Retrieved from: http://www.readinga-z.com/book/guided-reading.php?level=o&context=guided-reading

  • Robinson, S., & Stubberud, H. A. (2012). Student preferences for educational materials: Old meets new. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 16(1), 367-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, B. R., & Schaffer, L. (2010). Guided reading approach: Teaching reading to students who are deaf and others who struggle. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(5), 52-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, S. (2007). Action research: A developmental model of professional socialization. The ClearingHouse, 80(5), 211-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2013). Nearpod. Dance Teacher, 35(2), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, D. (2012). Embracing e-books: Increasing students’ motivation to read and write. Gifted Child Today, 35(2), 137-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B. (2003). Guided reading and secondlanguage learners. Multicultural Education, 11(2), 27-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C., & Cavanaugh, T. W. (2006). Promoting reading: Using ebooks with gifted and advanced readers. Gifted Child Today, 29(4), 56-63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA

    Stacy Delacruz

Authors
  1. Stacy Delacruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stacy Delacruz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delacruz, S. Using Nearpod in elementary guided reading groups. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 58, 62–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0787-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0787-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation