Abstract
Between 2000 and 2009, 243 students in 11 cohort groups participated in the Internet-Based Masters in Educational Technology (iMet) Program. iMet is a hybrid masters program in education with an emphasis in educational technology. Students in the program work collaboratively in a problem-based approach to the integration of technology into instruction. The program completion rates are higher than other online programs and even higher than traditional face-to-face masters programs. In addition, program graduates go on to become successful educational technology leaders. A key to the program’s success is the use of a community of practice model for its participants. An analysis of 78 student course reflections and 92 post-program surveys revealed that the community building strategies used in the program were instrumental in enhancing students’ experiences and boosting program completion rates. This article describes the key strategies used to develop and maintain a successful hybrid community of practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, S. (2002). Do not pass go: Why do learners leave online courses before finishing them? And should it matter if they do? Online Learning Magazine, 6(3) 15-17.
A’Vila De Lima, J. (2003) Trained for isolation: the impact of departmental cultures on student teachers’ views and practices of collaboration. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29(3) 197-219.
Fallahi, M. & Gulley, B. (2008). Impact of graduate program delivery models on teacher candidates’ success and perception. College Teaching Methods & Styles, 4(1) 39-44.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hsieh, H., Hsien, K. & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9) 1277-1288 DOI:10.1177/1049732305276687
Hubbell, L. (2010). When a class becomes a mob. College Student Journal, 4(42).
Johnson, C. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(1) 45-60.
Kirschnera, P. & Laib, K. (2007). Online communities of practice in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2) 127-131.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mandzuk, D., Hasinoff, S. & Seifert, K. (2003) Inside a student cohort: Teacher education from a social capital perspective. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1) 168-184.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2007). The path through graduate school: A longitudinal examination 10 years after bachelor’s degree. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007162.pdf.
Pomson, A. (2005). One classroom at a time? Teacher isolation and community viewed through the prism of the particular. Teachers College Record, 107(4) 783-802.
Radencich, M. C., et al. (1998). The culture of cohorts: Preservice teacher education teams at a southeastern university in the United States. Journal of Education for Teaching, 24(2) 109-127.
Renninger, A. & Shumar (2002). Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives) New York: Cambridge University Press
Schlichte, J, Yssel, N, Merbler, J. (2005) Pathways to burnout: Case studies in teacher isolation and alienation. Preventing School Failure, 50(1) 35-40.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowan, J.E. Strategies for Developing a Community of Practice: Nine Years of Lessons Learned in a Hybrid Technology Education Master’s Program. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 56, 12–18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0549-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0549-x