References
Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992) Theory into practice: How do we link? In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.) Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp.17–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Christensen, T. K., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (2004). How do instructional-design practitioners make instructional-strategy decisions? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(3) pp. 45–65.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.
The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10.
Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17–27.
Kirschner, P. A., Carr, C. S., & van Merrienboer, J. (2002). How expert designers design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(4) pp. 86–104.
Perez, R. S., & Emery, C. D. (1995). Designer thinking: How novices and experts think about instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), pp. 80–95.
Tripp, S. D. (1991). Two theories of design and instructional design. Proceedings of selected research presentations at the annual convention of AECT.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Real World Projects in an Advanced Instructional Design Course. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 52, 24–29 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0172-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0172-7