Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Analysis of Collaboration between Colleges of Education and Arts & Sciences in PT3

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Association for Colleges of Teacher Education. (2004). Teacher education primer 2004: Information for members of congress for the reauthorization of the higher education act. Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://www.aacte.org/Governmental_Relations/04primer.pdf

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Haycock, K. (2000). No more settling for less. Thinking K-16, 4(1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National education standards for teachers. Eugene, OR: ISTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interstate New Teachers Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for new teacher licensing, assessment and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington D.C.: INTASC. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/corestrd.pdf

  • Lloyd, D. M. (1999). Preparing exemplary teachers for the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities to use what we know. In K.A. Sirotnik & R. Soder (Eds.), The beat of a different drummer: Essays on educational renewal in honor of John I. Goodlad (pp. 45–58). New York: Peter Lang.

  • Mewborn, D. S.; Beckmann, S., Davion, V., Desmet, C.; Hudson-Ross, S., Oliver, J. P., Preissle, & J., Ruppersburg, H., (2002). Expanding the “great conversation” to include arts & sciences faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 27(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michigan teachers’ technology education network. (n.d.). Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://www.umd.umich.edu/mitten/MITTEN%20Project.doc

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2000). NCATE 2000 unit standards. Washington, D.C.: NCATE.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

  • Resta, P. E. (2004). Inventing new strategies for Integrating technology into education: Project INSITE evaluation report. University of Texas-Austin, Learning Technology Center.

  • Southworth, S. A. (2000, January/February). Wanted: Two million teachers. Instructor, 25–27.

  • Trubowitz, S. (2004). On balance: The marriage of liberal arts departments and schools of education [Electronic version]. Educational Horizons 82(2), 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wizer, D. R. & Ryan, T. (2004). A standards-based technology integration path at Towson University. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1). Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol4/iss1/general/article4.cfm

Download references

Authors
  1. Laurie Brantley-Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brendan Calandra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steve W. Harmon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mary B. Shoffner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brantley-Dias, L., Calandra, B., Harmon, S.W. et al. An Analysis of Collaboration between Colleges of Education and Arts & Sciences in PT3. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 50, 32–37 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-7601-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-7601-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation