Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Synchronous and Asynchronous Text-Based CMC in Educational Contexts: A Review of Recent Research

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effects of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classroom in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7. Retrieved March 5, 2005, from (http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/index.asp

  • Berge, Z. L. (1999, January/February). Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology. Retrieved February 25, 2005, from http://www.saskschools.ca/~parkland/interaction.htm

  • Bernard, R. M., Abram, P. C., Lou, Y, Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branon, R. F., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education: A survey of instructors. TechTrends, 45, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, C. (2003). Learning to chat: Tutor participation in synchronous online chat. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Muilenburg, L. Y, & Tanner, E. J. (2001). How do students participate in synchronous and asynchronous online discussions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C., & Kremer, A. (1999). Increasing students’ participation via multiple interactive media. Inventio, I. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from http://www.doit.gmu.edu/Archives/feb98/dede_l.htm

  • Dickey, M. D. (2003). Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education, 24, 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duemer, L., Fontenot, D., Gumfory, K., Kallus, M., Larsen, J., Schafer, S., et al., (2002). The use of online synchronous discussion groups to enhance community formation and professional identity development. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1. Retrieved Marchl, 2005,fromhttp://www.ncolr.org/jiol/ARCHIVES/2002/2/04/index.html

  • Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S. R., & Zhang, Y. (2005). Effectiveness for students: Comparisons of “in-seat” and ALN courses. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 39–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, E. B. (2002). Use of distance education in dental hygiene programs. Journal of Dental Education, 66, 1136–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, R. A., & Pearl, C. E. (2004). Increasing interaction in web-based instruction: Using synchronous chats and asynchronous discussions. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 23, 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W. Y, & Wang, C. Y. (2004). A study of learning time patterns in asynchronous learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning — the quality of discussion and stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10,1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. M. (2005). Student alienation, academic achievement, and WebCT use. Educational Technology and Society, 8, 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. M., & Howell, A. J. (2005). Attitude toward instructional technology following required vs. optional WebCT usage. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 643–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. M., & Howell, A. J. (2006). The impact of Internet learning technology: Experimental methods of determination. In B. L. Mann (Ed.), Selected styles in web-based educational research (pp. 282–301). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. M., Howell, A. J., & Code, J. R. (2005). Online discussion and college student learning: Toward a model of influence. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kear, K. (2004). Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education. Open Learning, 19, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koory, M. A. (2003). Differences in learning outcomes for the online and F2F versions of “An Introduction to Shakespeare.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n2/v7n2_koory.asp

  • Ligorio, M. B. (2001). Integrating communication formats: Synchronous versus asynchronous and text-based versus visual. Computers & Education, 37, 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, M., Neubauer, M., & Swedburg, R. (2002). Elements of group interaction in a real-time synchronous online learning-by-doing classroom without F2F participation. USDLA Journal. 16. Retrieved March 5, 2005, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/APR02_Issue/article01.html

  • Locatis, C., Fontelo, P., Sneiderman, C., Ackerman, M., Uijtdehaage, S., Candler, C. et al., (2003). Webcasting videoconferences over IP: A synchronous communication experiment. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 150–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. (2002). Is “as good as faceto-face” as good as it gets? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v6n2/v6n2_macdonald.asp

  • McIntosh, S., Braul, B., & Chao, T. (2003). A case study in asynchronous voice conferencing for language instruction. Educational Media International, 40, 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_meyer.asp

  • Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2001). Barriers to distance education: A factoranalytic study. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Accessible Media (2005). Guidelines for developing accessible synchronous communication and collaboration tools. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from http://ncam.wgbh.org/salt/guidelines/sec7.html

  • Ohlund, B., Yu, C. H., Jannssch-Pennell, A., & Digangi, S. A. (2000). Impact of asynchronous and synchronous internetbased communication on collaboration and performance among K-12 teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, L. C. (2003). Foreign language productivity in synchronous versus asynchronous computer-medicated communication. CAICO Journal, 21, 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciano, A. G. (2001). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6. Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/v6n1_picciano.asp

  • Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 397–432). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Rovai (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovy, B., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education. TechTrends, 45, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabau, I. (2005). Effective asynchronous communication online. Retrieved February 11, 2005, from http://breeze.ucalgary.ca/p52308523.

  • Schwienhorst, K. (2003). Learner autonomy and tandem learning: Putting principles into practice in synchronous and asynchronous telecommunications environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2001). Teaching with Internet and multimedia technologies: Insights from an online seminar on industrial modernization. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotsberger, P. G. (2000, January/February). The human touch: Synchronous communication in web-based learning. Educational Technology, 53–55.

  • Tu, C. H., & Corry, M. (2003). Designs, management tactics, and strategies in asynchronous learning discussions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., & Wosnitza, M. (2004). Social affordances and students’ engagement in cross-national online learning: An exploratory study. Journal of Research in International Education, 3, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., & Arnold, I. (2004). Introducing group-based asynchronous learning to business Education: Reflections on effective course design and delivery. Educational Media International, 41, 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. (2004). Correlational analysis of student visibility and performance in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n4/index.asp

  • Wu, D., & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8. Retrieved March 5, 2005, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n4/index.asp

  • Yang, H. L., & Tang, J. H. (2003). Effects of social network on students performance: a web-based forum study in Taiwan. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7. Retrieved March 5, 200,5 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_yang.asp

Download references

Authors
  1. Genevieve Marie Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

In 1990, Genevieve Marie Johnson was awarded a doctoral degree in educational psychology from the University of Alberta, Canada. Her current research program involves exploration of Internet technology and student attitudinal, behavioral and learning outcomes. For more information on the professional work of Genevieve Marie Johnson, visit: http://www.artsci.gmcc.ab.ca/people/johnsong/

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, G.M. Synchronous and Asynchronous Text-Based CMC in Educational Contexts: A Review of Recent Research. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 50, 46–53 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0046-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0046-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation