Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Issues in Software Engineering of Relevance to Instructional Design

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2002). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.inf.vtt.fi/pdf/publications/2002/P478

  • Advanced Distributed Learning. (2005). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.adlnet.org

  • Agile Alliance. (2001). The agile manifesto. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.agilemanifesto.org/

  • Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G. (1999). UML in action. Communications of the ACM, 44(10), 26–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostok, S. (1998). Courseware engineering: An overview of the course development process. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/cs/Stephen_Bostock/docs/atceng.htm

  • Fowler, M. (2000, December). Put processes on a diet. Software Development Online. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.sdmagazine.com/documents/s=737/sdm0012a/

  • Goodyear, P. (1995). Infrastructure for course-ware engineering. In R.D. Tennyson & A. E. Barron (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools (pp. 11–31). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Goodyear, P. (1997). Instructional design environments: Methods and tools. In S. Dijkstra, N.Seel, F. Schott & D. Tennyson, (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 2) (pp. 83–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training, 37(4), 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Rational Software. (2005). New to Rational. etrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www-128.ibm.com/developer-works/rational/newto/

  • IMS global learning consortium. (2005). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/

  • Nandigam, J. Lakhotia, A. & Cech C., (1999). Experimental evaluation of agreement between programmers in applying the rules of cohesion. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 11, 35–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Source Initiative. (2005). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.opensource.org/

  • Paulk, C. V., Weber, C. V., Curtis, B., & Chrissis, M. B. (1995). The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedagogical Patterns Project. (2005). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.pedagogicalpatterns.org/current/right.html

  • Pressman, R. S. (2000). Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1997). Automating instructional design. In S. Dijkstra, N.Seel, F. Schott & Tennyson, D. (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 2) (pp. 59–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Standish Group International. (1999). CHAOS: A recipe for success. Research report. West Yarmouth, Massachusetts. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/PDFpages/chaos199%9.pdf

  • Wilson, B., Jonassen, D., & Cole, P. (1993). Cognitive approaches to instructional design. In G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), The ASTD handbook of instructional technology (pp. 21.1–21.22). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Yourdon, E., & Constantine, L. (1979). Structured design: Fundamentals of a discipline of computer program and systems design. Englewood

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Learning Systems Institute and the College of Information, Florida State University, Florida

    Ian Douglas PhD, MA, MSc (Professor)

Authors
  1. Ian Douglas PhD, MA, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Ian Douglas has a PhD in computer science, an MA in psychology and an MSc in computing and cognition. He is a professor with a joint appointment between the Learning Systems Institute and the College of Information at Florida State University. Dr Douglas’s research interests are in human-computer interaction, human performance technology, knowledge management and IT systems in support of systems design. He has a number of publications relating to training and technology and has received three awards for innovations in the use of educational technology. He is currently the principal investigator on a research project investigating software models for the management of human performance knowledge in the military.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Douglas, I. Issues in Software Engineering of Relevance to Instructional Design. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 50, 28–35 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0035-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0035-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation