Skip to main content
Log in

Reduplication in Harmonic Serialism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In standard Optimality Theory, faithfulness constraints are defined in terms of an input-output correspondence relation, and similar constraints are applied to the correspondence relation between a stem and its reduplicative copy. In Harmonic Serialism, a derivational version of Optimality Theory, there is no input-output correspondence relation, and instead faithfulness violations are based on which operations the candidate-generating Gen component has applied.

This article presents a novel theory of reduplication, situated within Harmonic Serialism, called Serial Template Satisfaction. Reduplicative correspondence constraints are replaced by operations that copy strings of constituents. Depending on the constraint ranking, phonological processes may precede or follow copying, with different effects. Serial Template Satisfaction and reduplicative correspondence theory make different predictions about partial reduplication, prosodic constituent copying, skipping effects, and reduplication-phonology interactions. The predictions of Serial Template Satisfaction are argued to be superior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelaar, K. A. & Himmelmann, N. (Eds.) (2005). The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adomako, K. (2008). Vowel epenthesis and consonant deletion in loanwords: a study of Akan. Master’s thesis, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway.

  • Ahn, S.-C. (1998). An introduction to Korean phonology. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R. (1975). On the interaction of phonological rules of various types. Journal of Linguistics, 11, 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, R. B. (1976). Reduplication in Chumash. In M. Langdon & S. Silver (Eds.), Hokan studies (pp. 271–283). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, M., Arsyad, A., Basri, H., & Broselow, E. (1987). Tier configuration in Makassarese reduplication. In A. Bosch, E. Schiller, & B. Need (Eds.), CLS 23: parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology (pp. 1–15). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, P. (1981). A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, K. (1999). Reduplication in Yapese: a case of syllable copying. In C. Kitto & C. Smallwood (Eds.), Proceedings of AFLA VI (pp. 17–24). Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. (2008). Phonological trends in the lexicon: the role of constraints. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA.

  • Benua, L. (1997). Transderivational identity: phonological relations between words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA.

  • Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 206–244). Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, J. (1996). Mokilese reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(3), 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (2005). Nias. In K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 562–589). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, E. (1997). Integrity and correspondence in Manam double reduplication. Proceedings of NELS, 28, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, E. (1998). Alignment in Manam stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 475–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, G. (2006). ‘Templatic backcopying’ in Guarijio abbreviated reduplication. Morphology, 16(2), 273–289. doi:10.1007/s11525-007-9108-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier-Duncan, J. (1984). Some problems with prosodic accounts of reduplication. In M. Aronoff & R. T. Oehrle (Eds.), Language sound structure (pp. 260–286). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y.-M. Y. (1990). Parameters of consonantal assimilation. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Chung, C. W. (1999). Reduplication in Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

  • Chung, C. W. (2003). An Optimality-Theoretic approach to full reduplication in Korean. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 11(2), 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchward, C. M. (1940). Rotuman grammar and dictionary. Sydney: Australasia Medical Publishing Co. (Repr. 1978, New York: AMS Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G. N. (1986). Syllabification and epenthesis in the Barra dialect of Gaelic. In K. Bogers, H. van der Hulst, & M. Mous (Eds.), The phonological representation of suprasegmentals (pp. 317–336). Dordrecht: Foris

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A. (1989). Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 7, 167–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowhurst, M. (2004). Mora alignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 22(1), 127–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, T. (1978). The Middle Clarence dialects of Bandjalang. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, T. (1982). In The Paamese language of Vanuatu. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, the Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. F. (1976). Some notes on Luiseño phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics, 42(3), 192–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demers, R. A., Escalante, F., & Jelinek, E. (1999). Prominence in Yaqui words. International Journal of American Linguistics, 65(1), 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W. (1972). The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W. (1977). A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1980). Ngiyambaa: the language of the Wangaaybuwan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, M. (1999). A grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, L. (2000). Morphological and prosodic constraints on Kinande verbal reduplication. Phonology, 17, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudas, K. (1976). The phonology and morphology of Modern Javanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.

  • Elfner, E. (to appear). Stress-epenthesis interactions in Harmonic Serialism. In J. J. McCarthy & J. Pater (Eds.), Harmonic grammar and Harmonic Serialism. London: Equinox Publishing.

  • Fabricius, A. H. (1998). A comparative survey of reduplication in Australian languages. München: Lincom Europa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick-Cole, J. (1996). Reduplication meets the phonological phrase in Bengali. The Linguistic Review, 13(3–4), 305–356. doi:10.1515/tlir.1996.13.3-4.305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flack, K. (2007). Templatic morphology and indexed markedness constraints. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 749–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, G. (1959). Yaqui phonemics. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(5), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, J. (2009). Distributed reduplication. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gafos, A. (1998). Eliminating long-distance consonantal spreading. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16, 223–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghomeshi, J., Jackendoff, R., Rosen, N., & Russell, K. (2004). Contrastive focus reduplication in English (The Salad-Salad paper). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 22(2), 307–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouskova, M. (2007). The reduplicative template in Tonkawa. Phonology, 24, 367–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich, N. (2000). Reduplication in Southern Paiute and correspondence theory. In R. Billerey & B. D. Lillehaugen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 167–177). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. (1973). Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: an Australian example. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 9. Diachronic, areal and typological linguistics (pp. 401–458). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, G. Ó. (2001). Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

  • Harvey, M. (1991). Glottal stop, underspecification and syllable structure among the Top End languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 67–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, J. D. (2003). Allomorphy in Yaqui reduplication. In L. M. Barragan & J. D. Haugen (Eds.), MIT working papers on endangered and less familiar languages 5 (pp. 75–103). Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, J. D. (2008). Morphology at the interfaces: reduplication and noun incorporation in Uto-Aztecan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, J. D. (2009). What is the base for reduplication? Linguistic Inquiry, 40(3), 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B., & Abad, M. (1989). Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano. Lingua, 77, 331–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. (1980). Pacific linguistics: Basic materials in Ritharngu: grammar, texts, and dictionary. Canberra: Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. (1981) Pacific linguistics: Vol. 60. Basic materials in Mara: grammar, texts, and dictionary. Canberra: Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelmann, N. (2001). Pacific linguistics: Vol. 511. Sourcebook on Tomini-Tolitoli languages: general information and word lists. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, the Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelmann, N. (2005). The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 110–181). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, E. C. (1990). Yale linguistic series: Vol. 3. Beginning Javanese / by Elinor C. Horne. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurch, B. (2005 et seq.). Graz Database on Reduplication.

  • Hyman, L. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S., Orgun, O., & Zoll, C. (1997). The implications of lexical exceptions for the nature of grammar. In I. Roca (Ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology (pp. 393–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, J. (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  • Ito, J. (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 7, 217–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, J., & Mester, A. (2003). Lexical and postlexical phonology in Optimality Theory: evidence from Japanese. Linguistische Berichte, 11, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D., & Joseph, B. D. (2002). Sanskrit as she has been misanalyzed prosodically. In R. Singh (Ed.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics (pp. 59–90). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. T. (1977). Yapese reference grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesney, K. (to appear). Positional faithfulness, non-locality, and the Harmonic Serialism solution. In S. Lima, K. Mullin, & B. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North East linguistic society. Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Kager, R. (2009). Lexical irregularity and the typology of contrast. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (Eds.), The nature of the word: studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky (pp. 397–432). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. (2003). Confluence in phonology: evidence from Micronesian reduplication. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

  • Kennedy, R. (2005). The binarity effect in Kosraean reduplication. Phonology, 22, 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. (2008). Evidence for morphoprosodic alignment in reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(4), 589–614. doi:10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz, M. (1981). Functional explanations in generative phonology. In D. L. Goyvaerts (Ed.), Phonology in the 1980’s (pp. 431–444). Ghent: E. Story-Scientia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz, M., & Banksira, D. P. (1999). Reduplicative identity in Chaha. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 573–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimper, W. (2008). Syntactic reduplication and the spellout of movement chains. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimper, W. (2011). Locality and globality in phonological variation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 423–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimper, W. (to appear). Harmony is myopic. Linguistic Inquiry.

  • Kiparsky, P. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 421–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (1986). The phonology of reduplication. Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (1993). Blocking in non-derived environments. In S. Hargus & E. Kaisse (Eds.), Studies in lexical phonology (pp. 277–313). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (2010). Reduplication in stratal OT. In L. Uyechi & L. H. Wee (Eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: pattern interaction in language & life (pp. 125–142). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, M. (2005). Kambera. In K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 709–734). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinken, C. L. v. (1999). Pacific linguistics: Vol. 155. A grammar of the Fehan dialect of Tetun, an Austronesian language of West Timor. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, the Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klokeid, T. (1976). Topics in Lardil grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

  • Kuipers, A. H. (1967). The Squamish language, grammar, texts, dictionary: 2 parts. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-D. (1975). Kusaiean reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberk, F. (1983). A grammar of Manam. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunden, S. L. A. (2006). Reduplicant placement, anchoring, and locality. Williamsburg: College of William and Mary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, A. (1982). Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 483–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascaró, J. (1987). A reduction and spreading theory of voicing and other sound effects. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (1993). A case of surface constraint violation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 38, 169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2000). Harmonic Serialism and parallelism. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East linguistics society (Vol. 30, pp. 501–524). Amherst: GLSA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2002). Research surveys in linguistics: A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2003). Sympathy, cumulativity, and the Duke-of-York gambit. In C. Féry & R. v. d. Vijver (Eds.), The syllable in Optimality Theory (pp. 23–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2007a). Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2007b). Restraint of analysis. In S. Blaho, P. Bye, & M. Krämer (Eds.), Studies in generative grammar: Vol. 95. Freedom of analysis (pp. 203–231). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2008a). The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology, 25, 271–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2008b). The serial interaction of stress and syncope. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 26, 499–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2009). Studying Gen. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 13(2), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2010a). Autosegmental spreading in Optimality Theory. In J. Goldsmith, E. Hume, & L. Wetzels (Eds.), Tones and features (pp. 195–222). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2010b). Doing Optimality Theory supplement on Harmonic Serialism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2010c). An introduction to Harmonic Serialism. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 1001–1018. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00240.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2011). Perceptually grounded faithfulness in Harmonic Serialism. Linguistic Inquiry, 42(1).

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1986/1996). Prosodic morphology 1986. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 8, 209–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1993). Prosodic morphology: constraint interaction and satisfaction. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1994a). The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. In M. Gonzàlez (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East linguistic society (Vol. 24, pp. 333–379). Amherst: GLSA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1994b). Two lectures on prosodic morphology (Utrecht, 1994). Part I: Template form in prosodic morphology. Part II: Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst and Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1995a). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics (Vol. 18, pp. 249–384). Amherst: GLSA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1995b). Prosodic morphology. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 318–366). Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1999). Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), The prosody-morphology interface (pp. 218–309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, J. (1987). Concerning the nature of certain consonants in Southern Paiute, … Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, W. (1990). A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, L. (1990). Multiplanar reduplication: evidence from Sesotho. In A. Halpern (Ed.), The proceedings of the West Coast conference on formal linguistics (Vol. 9, pp. 331–346). Stanford: Stanford Linguistic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlan, F. (1982). Lingua descriptive series: Mangarayi. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, A. (1986). Studies in tier structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  • Moravcsik, E. (1978). Reduplicative constructions. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 293, pp. 297–334). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphy, F. (1983). Djapu, a Yolngu dialect. In R. M. W. Dixon & B. J. Blake (Eds.), Handbook of Australian languages (Vol. III, pp. 1–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, P., & Benson, P. (1973). Reduplication and rule ordering in Luiseño. International Journal of American Linguistics, 39, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, D. (1980). Topics in Warlpiri grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

  • Nelson, N. (2003). Asymmetric anchoring. Doctoral dissertation. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

  • Nelson, N. (2005). Wrong side reduplication is epiphenomenal: evidence from Yoruba. In B. Hurch (Ed.), Studies on reduplication (pp. 135–160). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odden, D., & Odden, M. (1985). Ordered reduplication in Kihehe. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 497–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onn, F. M. (1980). Aspects of Malay phonology and morphology: a generative approach. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pater, J. (2008). Morpheme-specific phonology: constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In S. Parker (Ed.), Phonological argumentation: essays on evidence and motivation, London: Equinox Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. (1981). The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. Arlington: The Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poedjosoedarmo, S. (1969). Wordlist of Javanese non-Ngoko vocabularies. Indonesia, 7, 65–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poser, W. J. (1982). Phonological representations and action-at-a-distance. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Vol. 2, pp. 121–158). Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poser, W. J. (1989). The metrical foot in Diyari. Phonology, 6, 117–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, A. (2002). Arguing optimality. In A. Carpenter, A. Coetzee, & P. de Lacy (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics: Vol. 26. Papers in Optimality Theory II (pp. 269–304). Amherst: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993/2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, K. (2010). Serialism and locality in constraint-based metrical parsing. Phonology, 27, 481–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimy, E. (2000). Studies in generative grammar: Vol. 52. The phonology and morphology of reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimy, E. (2011). Reduplication. In M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume, & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (pp. 2383–2413). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, D. V., & Dong, M.-N. (2005). Yami reduplication. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 31(2), 57–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, J. (2004). Nonlocal reduplication. Proceedings of NELS, 34, 485–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Walker, R. (2004). A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Language, 80, 475–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubino, C. (2005). Iloko. In K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 326–349). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, K. (1997). Optimality Theory and morphology. In D. Archangeli & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Optimality Theory: an overview (pp. 102–133). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1930). Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean language. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 65(1–3).

  • Sapir, E. (1931). Southern Paiute dictionary. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 65(3), 537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics: Vol. 18. Papers in Optimality Theory (pp. 439–470). Amherst: GLSA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P. (1980). Dakota phonology and morphology. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P. (2005). Non-adjacency in reduplication. In B. Hurch (Ed.), Studies on reduplication (pp. 161–210). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetler, J. (1976). Language data: Asian-Pacific series: Vol. 9. Notes on Balangao grammar. Huntington Beach: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sietsema, B. (1988). Reduplication in Dakota. In G. L. L. McCleod & D. Brentari (Eds.), CLS: Vol. 24. Papers from the 24th annual regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society. Part one: The general session (pp. 337–352). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2002). Dynamic versus static phonotactic conditions in prosodic morphology. Linguistics, 40(1), 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaelti, P. (1995). A constraint-based theory of reduplication patterns. In J. Camacho, L. Choueiri, & M. Watanabe (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourteenth West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 477–492). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaelti, P. (1997). Dimensions of variation in multi-pattern reduplication. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Spring, C. (1990). Implications of Axininca Campa for prosodic morphology and reduplication. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

  • Staubs, R. (to appear). Pathologies of feature-driven stress. In Proceedings of NELS (Vol. 41). Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Staubs, R., Becker, M., Potts, C., Pratt, P., McCarthy, J. J., & Pater, J. (2010). OT-Help 2.0 [computer program]. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, D. (1988). Reduplication and syllable transfer in Sanskrit and elsewhere. Phonology, 5, 73–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, D. (2001/2008). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (Eds.), The nature of the word: studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky (pp. 151–180. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. M. (1968). American oriental series: Vol. 52. Madurese phonology and morphology. New Haven: American Oriental Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, B. S. (1988). Aspects of Malay phonology revisited—a non-linear approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.

  • Thurgood, E. (1997). Bontok reduplication and prosodic templates. Oceanic Linguistics, 36(1), 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsukida, N. (2005). Seediq. In K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 291–325). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbanczyk, S. (2006). Reduplicative form and the root-affix asymmetry. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 24, 179–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Engelenhoven, A., & Williams-van Klinken, C. (2005). Tetun and Leti. In K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 735–768). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (2010). Nonmyopic harmony and the nature of derivations. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, R. (2001). The structure of the German vocabulary: edge marking of categories and functional considerations. Linguistics, 39, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, R. (1973a). The phonology of reduplication. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.

  • Wilbur, R. (1973b). Reduplication and rule ordering. In CLS (Vol. 9, pp. 679–687). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K. (1986). Prosodic structure and Lardil phonology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K. (1988). Prosodic structure and Lardil phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. (2000). Targeted constraints: an approach to contextual neutralization in Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

  • Wilson, C. (2001). Consonant cluster neutralization and targeted constraints. Phonology, 18, 147–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2008). Optimal interleaving: serial phonology-morphology interaction in a constraint-based model. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA.

  • Zobel, E. (2005). Buol. In K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 625–648). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoll, C. (2002). Vowel reduction and reduplication in Klamath. Linguistic Inquiry, 33(3), 520–527.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John J. McCarthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarthy, J.J., Kimper, W. & Mullin, K. Reduplication in Harmonic Serialism. Morphology 22, 173–232 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-012-9203-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-012-9203-3

Keywords

Navigation