Skip to main content
Log in

Polite plurals and adjective agreement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When an agreement controller such as a subject NP is a hybrid of contrasting syntactic and semantic features, the choice of syntactic versus semantic agreement depends on both the type of agreement target and the type of agreement controller. Two types of controller are contrasted: hybrid pronouns such as polite uses of the second person plural to refer to one addressee; and hybrid common nouns such as plurale tante. In some languages the pronoun type triggers singular on a predicate adjective and plural on the verb, while the common noun type triggers plural on both adjectives and verbs. The former pattern is explained in terms of underspecification of the pronoun: it is unspecified for the Concord number feature, to which adjectives are sensitive; but it carries a number feature on its referential Index, to which finite verbs are sensitive. An Agreement Marking Principle is proposed, according to which an agreement target checks the trigger for a syntactic phi feature, assigning that feature’s semantic interpretation to the trigger denotation if no syntactic feature is found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avram, M. (1986). Gramatica pentru toti. Ed. Acad. Rep. Soc. România.

  • Badecker W. (2007) A feature principle for partial agreement. Lingua 117 9: 1541–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan J. (2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan J., Mchombo S.A. (1987) Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewa. Language 63(4): 741–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G. (1998) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In: Rothstein S. (eds) Events and grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 53–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie B. (1975) Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language 51(2): 406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A. (1992). The representation of lexical semantic information. PhD dissertation, University of Sussex.

  • Copestake A. (1995) The representation of group denoting nouns in a lexical knowledge base. In: Saint-Dizier P., Viegas E. (eds) Computational lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 207–231

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G. (1983) Hierarchies, targets and controllers: Agreement patterns in Slavic. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G. (1991) Gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G. (2000) Number. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G. (2004) The Russian adjective: A pervasive yet elusive category. In: Dixon R.M.W., Aikhenvald A.Y. (eds) Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 199–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G. (2006) Agreement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple M. (2001) Lexical functional grammar. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dončeva-Mareva L. (1978) Sǎglasuveaneto na učtivoto Vie sǎs skazuemoto v bǎlgarskija i ruskija ezik ot kvantitativno gledište. Sǎpostavitelno ezikoznanie 3: 70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahm, H.-J. (2006a). Uniform or mixed agreement due to the personal pronouns. Paper presented at Midwest Slavic Conference, Ohio State University.

  • Hahm, H.-J. (2006b). Number agreement in Russian predicates. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 402–420). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Hahm, H.-J., & Wechsler, S. (2007). Untangling the Russian predicate agreement knot. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 07 conference (pp. 233–249). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Johannessen J.B. (1998) Coordination. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • King T.H., Dalrymple M. (2004) Determiner agreement and noun conjunction. Journal of Linguistics 40(01): 69–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka M. (1995) Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In: Carlson G.N., Pelletier F.J. (eds) The generic book. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 398–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, J., Sadler, L., Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2007). Single conjunct agreement and the formal treatment of coordination in LFG. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of LFG07 (p. 302).Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://csli-publications.edu.

  • Lascarides A., Briscoe T., Asher N., Copestake A. (1995) Order independent and persistent typed default unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 1–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link G. (1983) The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In: Bäerle R., Schwarze C., Stechow A. (eds) Meaning, use and interpretation of language. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 302–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarski W. (1973) Konstrukcje pluralis maiestatis w gwarach Rzeszowszczyzny. Poradnik Jezykowy 1: 30–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning C.D. (2003) Probabilistic syntax. In: Bod R., Hay J., Jannedy S. (eds) Probabilistic linguistics. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey J. (1991) There, it, and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 22(3): 563–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard C., Sag I. (1994) Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CSLI Publications and University of Chicago Press, Stanford and Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewierska A. (2004) Person. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler S. (2004) Number as person. In: Bonami O., Hofherr P.C. (eds) Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 5. Academic Press, New York, pp 255–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler S. (2008a) Elsewhere in gender resolution. In: Hanson K., Inkelas S. (eds) The nature of the word—essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 567–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, S. (2008b). Agreement features. In Language and linguistics compass. Blackwell Publishers (online publications).

  • Wechsler S., Zlatić L. (2000) A theory of agreement and its application to Serbo-Croatian. Language 76(4): 799–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler S., Zlatić L. (2003) The many faces of agreement. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatić, L. (1996). Syntactico-semantic approach to binding: Evidence from Serbian. In First LINGUIST electronic conference on geometric and thematic structure in binding. http://www.linguistlist.org/linconf/zlatic.

  • Zlatić, L. (1997a). Process nominals and anaphor binding in Serbian. In Proceedings of the fourth conference on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics (pp. 464–487). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

  • Zlatić, L. (1997b). The structure of the Serbian noun phrase. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Wechsler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wechsler, S., Hahm, HJ. Polite plurals and adjective agreement. Morphology 21, 247–281 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9168-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9168-z

Keywords

Navigation