Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling affix order

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Allen, M. (1978). Morphological investigations. PhD thesis, University of Conneticut.

  • Alsina A. (1999) Where’s the mirror principle?. The Linguistic Review 16(1): 1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S.R. (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff M. (1992) Noun classes in Arapesh. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1991. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff M., Fuhrhop N. (2002) Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen R.H. (1992) Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1991. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 109–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen R.H. (2008) Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, H. R., Kryuchkova, T., & Vickerman, A. (2009). Ordering constraints in English derivation and compounds. Paper presented at the Second Vienna workshop on affix order, Vienna, June 5–6, 2009. Abstract available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/2nd_workshop_abstracts/abstract_baayen_et_al.pdf.

  • Baayen R.H., Lieber R. (1991) Productivity and English derivation: A corpus based study. Linguistics 29: 801–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gullikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Baker M. (1985) The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel B., Banjade G., Gaenszle M., Lieven E., Paudyal N.P., Rai P.I. et al (2007) Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83: 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee J.L. (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, G. (2010). Scope, phonology and morphology in an agglutinating language: Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) variable suffix ordering. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9147-4

  • Dressler W.U. (1989) Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft and Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W. U., Aksu-Koç, A., Laalo, K., & Pfeiler, B. (2009). Early phases in the acquisition of affix order. Paper presented at the Second Vienna workshop on affix order, Vienna, June 5–6, 2009. Abstract available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/2nd_workshop_abstracts/abstract_dressler_et_al.pdf.

  • Fabb N. (1988) English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaeta L. (2005) Combinazioni di suffissi in Italiano. In: Grossmann M., Thornton A. (eds) La Formazione delle Parole. Atti del XXXVII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Societa di Linguistica Italiana (SLI). Roma, Bulzoni, pp 229–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Giegerich H.J. (1999) Lexical strata in English. Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Givón T. (1971) Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip, CLS #7. University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J. (1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In: Greenberg J. (eds) Universals of language. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay J. (2001) Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?. Linguistics, 39: 1041–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay J. (2002) From speech perception to morphology: Affix-ordering revisited. Language 78(3): 527–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay J. (2003) Causes and consequences of word structure. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay J., Baayen H. (2002) Parsing and productivity. In: Booij G.E., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2001. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 203–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay J., Plag I. (2004) What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 565–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman L. (2003) Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2002. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 245–281

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L. (2006). Affixation by place of articulation: Rare and mysterious. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab annual report (2006). Available at http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/phonlab/annual_report/documents/2006/Hyman_Tiene.pdf.

  • Inkelas S. (1993) Nimboran position class morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 559–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova-Mirčeva D., Xaralampiev I. (1999) Istorija na bălgarskija ezik [A history of Bulgarian Language]. Veliko Tărnovo, Faber

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2010). Phonological and morphological conditions on affix order in Huave. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9149-2

  • Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 1–91). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.

  • Manova S. (2005) Derivation versus inflection in three inflecting languages. In: Dressler W.U., Kastovsky D., Pfeiffer O., Rainer F. (eds) Morphology and its demarcations. Selected papers from the eleventh International morphology meeting, Vienna, pp 233–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Manova S. (2008) Closing suffixes and the structure of the Slavic word: Movierung. In Austrian contributions to the fourteenth international congress of Slavists, Ohrid, Macedonia, September, 2008, Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch 54: 91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Manova, S. (2009a). Closing suffixes in Bulgarian, Russian and German: the role of semantics. In: Farkas Baráthi, Mónika (Eds), Bulgarian language and literature in Slavic and non-Slavic contexts. Available at: http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/manova_szeged2009.pdf (to appear) .

  • Manova, S. (2009b). A cognitive approach to SUFF1-SUFF2 combinations. Manuscript of a paper given at the Second Vienna workshop on affix order. Vienna, June 5–6, 2009. Abstract available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/2nd_workshop_abstracts/abstract_manova.pdf.

  • Manova S. (2010a) Understanding morphological rules Conversion and Subtraction in Bulgarian, Russian and Serbo-croatian. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Manova, S. (2010b). Suffix combination in Bulgarian: Parsability and hierarchy-based ordering. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9148-3

  • Mirčev K. (2000) Starobălgarski ezik [Old Bulgarian]. Veliko Tărnovo, Faber

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithun M. (1999) The languages of native North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan K.P. (1986) The theory of lexical phonology. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Narrog, H. (2010). The order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9150-9

  • Paster M. (2005) Pulaar verbal extensions and phonologically driven affix order. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2005. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 155–199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plag I. (1996) Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisited. A reply to Fabb (1988). Linguistics 34: 769–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag I. (1999) Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag I. (2002) role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2001. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 285–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag I., Baayen H. (2009) Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85: 109–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice K. (2000) Morpheme order and semantic scope. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, K. (2009). Principles of affix ordering: An overview. Paper presented at the Second Vienna workshop on affix order, Vienna, June 5–6, 2009. Handout available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/Keren_Rice_Principles_of_Affix_Ordering_Handout.pdf.

  • Selkirk E. (1982) The syntax of words. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel D. (1974) Topics in English morphology. Cambridge, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J., Withgott M. (1986) Pronominal clitic clusters and templates. In: Borer H. (eds) The syntax of pronominal clitics Syntax and semantics vol. 19. Academic Press, New York, pp 149–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer A. (1991) Morphological theory. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer A. (2006) Morphological universals. In: Mairal R., Gil J. (eds) Linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–129

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stump G.T. (1992) On the theoretical status of position class restriction in inflectional affixes. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1991. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 211–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump G.T. (1997) Template morphology and inflectional morphology. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1996. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 217–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirkel, L. (2010). Prefix combinations in English: structural and processing factors. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9151-8

Articles to appear in the second issue of Morphology, 20:

  • Aronoff, M., & Xu, Z. (to appear). A realization OT approach to affix order.

  • Korotkova, N., & Lander, Y. (to appear). Deriving affix ordering in polysynthesis: Evidence from Adyghe.

  • Melissaropoulou, D., & Ralli, A. (to appear). Structural combinatorial properties of Greek derivational suffixes.

  • Mykhaylyk, R. (to appear). Diachronic universal and morpheme order in the Ukrainian synthetic imperfective future.

  • Nordlinger, R. (to appear). Verbal morphology in Murrinh-Patha: Evidence for templates.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stela Manova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manova, S., Aronoff, M. Modeling affix order. Morphology 20, 109–131 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9153-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9153-6

Keywords

Navigation