Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceptions of Violent Encounters between Police and Young Black Men across Stakeholder Groups

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Violence between police and young black men is a longstanding issue that has gained national attention in recent years due to high-profile violent encounters. We conducted 48 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from different groups (young black men aged 14–24 years, parents, educators, police officers, and staff in youth serving organizations). Stakeholders were asked to (1) identify causes of violent encounters between police and young black men; (2) describe police officers who serve in their communities; and (3) describe interactions between police and young black men. Data were collected and analyzed using thematic analysis and content analysis methods. All stakeholder groups except police felt that violent encounters between police and young black men were caused by officers lacking a connection with communities. Fear and distrust across stakeholder groups was also seen as a cause of violent encounters; youth feared police after having seen or heard of violent encounters, while officers feared youth due to the availability of firearms and previous assaults on officers. Several stakeholder groups recognized that racism and prejudice among police was another cause of violence between police and young black men. Positive interactions between police and youth were seen as the result of established, trusting relationships developed over time. Future efforts to prevent violent encounters between police and young black men should engage multiple stakeholder groups. One avenue for engagement is through community mobilization efforts that foster collaboration, build community trust, and encourage implementation of policies, programs, and practices that prevent future violent encounters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Washington Post. Fatal Force [database online]. 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/police-shootings-2019/. Accessed 7 Oct 2019.

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Violence and homicide among youth. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/toolstemplates/entertainmented/tips/ViolenceYouth.html. Accessed 4 June 2019.

  3. Berg MT. Accounting for racial disparities in the nature of violent victimization. J Quant Criminol. 2014;30(4):629–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson JB Jr, Brown J, Van Brakle M. Pathways to early violent death: the voices of serious violent youth offenders. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(7):e5–e16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harrell E. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: Black victims of violent crime. Darby PA: Diane Publishing; 2007:1-12.

  6. Buehler JW. Racial/ethnic disparities in the use of lethal force by US police, 2010–2014. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(2):295–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards F, Lee H, Esposito M. Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(34):16793–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bui AL, Coates MM, Matthay EC. Years of life lost due to encounters with law enforcement in the USA, 2015–2016. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(8):715–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapman C. Use of force in minority communities is related to police education, age, experience, and ethnicity. Police Pract Res. 2012;13(5):421–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crawford C, Burns R. Police use of force: assessing the impact of time and space. Polic Soc. 2008;18(3):322–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paoline EA III, Gau JM, Terrill W. Race and the police use of force encounter in the United States. Br J Criminol. 2016;58(1):54–74.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Desmond M, Papachristos AV, Kirk DS. Police violence and citizen crime reporting in the black community. Am Sociol Rev. 2016;81(5):857–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fratello J, Rengifo AF, Trone J. Coming of age with stop and frisk: experiences, self-perceptions, and public safety implications. New York NY: Vera Institute of Justice; 2013.

  14. Payne YA, Hitchens BK, Chambers DL. “Why I can’t stand out in front of my house?”: street-identified black youth and young adult’s negative encounters with police. Sociol Forum. 2017;32(4):874–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brunson RK, Miller J. Gender, race, and urban policing: the experience of African American youths. Gend Soc. 2006;20(4):531–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hurst YG, Frank J. How kids view cops: the nature of juvenile attitudes toward the police. J Crim Just. 2000;28(3):189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carr PJ, Napolitano L, Keating J. We never call the cops and here is why: a qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology. 2007;45(2):445–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaney C, Robertson RV. Racism and police brutality in America. J Afr Am Stud. 2013;17(4):480–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chronopoulos T. Police misconduct, community opposition, and urban governance in New York City, 1945–1965. J Urban Hist. 2015;44(4):643–68.

  20. Hassell KD, Archbold CA. Widening the scope on complaints of police misconduct. Polic Int J Police Strateg Manag. 2010;33(3):473–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jefferis E, Butcher F, Hanley D. Measuring perceptions of police use of force. Police Pract Res Int J. 2011;12(1):81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barthelemy JJ, Chaney C, Maccio EM, Church WT II. Law enforcement perceptions of their relationship with community: law enforcement surveys and community focus groups. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2016;26(3–4):413–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee C. But I thought he had a gun-race and police use of a deadly force. Hastings Race & Poverty LJ. 2004;2:1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendel RA. Less Hype, More Help: Reducing Juvenile Crime, What Works-and What Doesn’t. Collingdale: DIANE Publishing; 2000:1–97.

  25. Development Services Group, Inc. “Interactions between youth and law enforcement.” Literature review. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2018. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Interactions-Youth-Law-Enforcement.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  26. General US. Youth violence: a report of the surgeon general. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Boyko JA, Wathen CN, Kothari A. Effectively engaging stakeholders and the public in developing violence prevention messages. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0390-2. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  28. Payne BK, Button DM. Developing a citywide youth violence prevention plan: perceptions of various stakeholders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2009;53(5):517–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: the Search for Meaning. New York NY: Wiley; 1984.

  30. Comparative Case Studies, Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 9. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research; 2014:1–17.

  31. Chappell, B. Police stop ends in black man’s death; aftermath is live-streamed on Facebook. Washington DC: National Public Radio; 2016.

  32. Walsh, P. Jany, L. Anger builds after police shoot assault suspect in Minneapolis. Star Tribune. November 16, 2015. http://www.startribune.com/police-officer-shoots-north-minneapolis-assault-suspect-during-physical-struggle/349730171/. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  33. Goodman LA. Snowball sampling. Ann Math Stat. 1961:148–70.

  34. Martin PY, Turner BA. Grounded theory and organizational research. J Appl Behav Sci. 1986;22(2):141–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sivasubramaniam D, Goodman-Delahunty J. Ethnicity and trust: perceptions of police bias. International Journal of Police Science & Management. 2008;10(4):388–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lawson K. Police shooting of black men and implicit racial bias: can’t we all just get along. U Haw L Rev. 2015;37:339.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nix J, Campbell BA, Byers EH, Alpert GP. A bird’s eye view of civilians killed by police in 2015: further evidence of implicit bias. Criminology & Public Policy. 2017;16(1):309–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith BW, Holmes MD. Police use of excessive force in minority communities: a test of the minority threat, place, and community accountability hypotheses. Soc Probl. 2014;61(1):83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Russell-Brown K. The academic swoon over implicit racial bias: costs, benefits, and other considerations. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. 2018;15(1):185–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Center for Healthy African American Men (NIH U54MD008620) and by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32CA163184 (Michele Allen, MD, MS; PI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Collin M. Calvert.

Ethics declarations

All study procedures were approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calvert, C.M., Brady, S.S. & Jones-Webb, R. Perceptions of Violent Encounters between Police and Young Black Men across Stakeholder Groups. J Urban Health 97, 279–295 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00417-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00417-6

Keywords

Navigation