Skip to main content
Log in

Socio-Economic Status and Prevalence of Self-Reported Osteoporosis in Tehran: Results from a Large Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study (Urban HEART-2)

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a widespread disease among older peoples. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of self-reported osteoporosis and assessing its association with socio-economic status. A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Tehran, Iran in 2011. Participants were 45,990 individuals aged above 20 years from 22 urban districts. Osteoporosis was measured by self-administrative questionnaire. Wealth index was constructed using principal component analysis based on household assets. Chi-square test, chi square test for trend, and crude odds ratio were used to assess associations in univariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression utilized to estimate adjusted associations between self-reported osteoporosis and socio-economic status.

The overall estimated prevalence of self-reported osteoporosis was 4% (95% CI 3.88–4.13), 1.19% in men, and 6.84% in women (P < 0.001). The prevalence increased considerably as age increased (P for trend < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, education and wealth status were negative, and smoking was positively associated with the prevalence of self-reported osteoporosis. No association was found between participants’ skill levels and Townsend deprivation index with the prevalence of self-reported osteoporosis.

The findings of the present study have improved understanding of the association between socioeconomic status and osteoporosis in the Iranian population. It is important to consider socioeconomic status in screening and prevention programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanis J A. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. World Health [Internet]. 2007;339. Available from: http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/pdfs/WHO_Technical_Report.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.

  2. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. Springer-Verlag. 2006;17:1726–33. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  3. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide Projections for Hip Fracture. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. Springer-Verlag London Limited. 1997;7:407–13. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/PL00004148. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  4. Ahmadi-Abhari S, Moayyeri A, Abolhassani F. Burden of Hip Fracture in Iran. Calcif. Tissue Int. [Internet]. Springer-Verlag. 2007;80:147–53. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00223-006-0242-9. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  5. Holroyd C, Cooper C, Dennison E, Conference CD, Cooper AP, Cooper C, et al. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. [Internet]. Elsevier. 2008;22:671–85. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1521690X08000766. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  6. Graham H. Unequal lives: health and socioeconomic inequalities. Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education; 2007.

  7. Brennan SL, Pasco JA, Urquhart DM, Oldenburg B, Hanna F, Wluka AE. The association between socioeconomic status and osteoporotic fracture in population-based adults: a systematic review. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. Springer-Verlag. 2009;20:1487–97. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-008-0822-9. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  8. Quah C, Boulton C, Moran C. The influence of socioeconomic status on the incidence, outcome and mortality of fractures of the hip. Bone Joint J. 2011;93–B.

  9. Zingmond DS, Soohoo NF, Silverman SL. The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. Springer-Verlag. 2006;17:1562–8. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-006-0161-7. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  10. Farahmand BY, Persson P-G, Michaëlsson K, Baron JA, Parker MG, Ljunghall S, et al. Socioeconomic status, marital status and hip fracture risk: a population-based case-control study. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. Springer-Verlag London Limited. 2000;11:803–8. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s001980070060. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  11. Bacon WE, Hadden WC. Occurrence of hip fractures and socioeconomic position. J. Aging Health [Internet]. SAGE Publications. 2000;12:193–203. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11010696. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  12. Perez Cano R, Galan Galan F, Dilsen G. Risk factors for hip fracture in Spanish and Turkish women. Bone Elsevier. 1993;14:69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Filmer D, Pritchett L. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in States of India. Demography [Internet]. Springer-Verlag. 2001;38:115–32. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1353/dem.2001.0003. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  14. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J. Epidemiol. Community Health [Internet]. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2006;60:7–12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16361448. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  15. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Smith GD. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2). J Epidemiol Community Heal [Internet]. 2006;60:95–101. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40795178. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.

  16. Frost M, Wraae K, Gudex C, Nielsen T, Brixen K, Hagen C, et al. Chronic diseases in elderly men: underreporting and underdiagnosis. Age Ageing [Internet]. Oxford University Press. 2012;41:177–83. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22146130. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  17. Bergmann MM, Jacobs EJ, Hoffmann K, Boeing H. Agreement of self-reported medical history: comparison of an in-person interview with a self-administered questionnaire. Eur. J. Epidemiol. [Internet]. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2003;19:411–6. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000027350.85974.47. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  18. Peeters GMEE, Tett SE, Dobson AJ, Mishra GD. Validity of self-reported osteoporosis in mid-age and older women. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. Springer-Verlag. 2013;24:917–27. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-012-2033-7. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  19. Phillipov G, Phillips P, Leach G, Taylor A. Public perceptions and self-reported prevalence of osteoporosis in South Australia. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/TY4FR7YCCXW5W6VG.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2017.

  20. Martini LA, Moura EC de, Santos LC dos, Malta DC, Pinheiro M de M. Prevalência de diagnóstico auto-referido de osteoporose, Brasil, 2006. Rev. Saude Publica [Internet]. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo. 2009;43:107–16. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102009000900014&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  21. Baccaro LF, de Souza Santos Machado V, Costa-Paiva L, Sousa MH, Osis MJ, Pinto-Neto AM. Factors associated with osteoporosis in Brazilian women: a population-based household survey. Arch. Osteoporos. [Internet]. Springer London. 2013;8:138. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11657-013-0138-z. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  22. Werner P. Self-reported prevalence and correlates of osteoporosis: results from a representative study in Israel. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. [Internet]. 2003;37:277–92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14511853. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  23. Crandall CJ, Han W, Greendale GA, Seeman T, Tepper P, Thurston R, et al. Socioeconomic status in relation to incident fracture risk in the study of women’s health across the nation. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. Springer London. 2014;25:1379–88. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-013-2616-y. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  24. Asomaning K, Bertone-Johnson ER, Nasca PC, Hooven F, Pekow PS. The association between body mass index and osteoporosis in patients referred for a bone mineral density examination. J. Women’s Heal. [Internet]. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2 Madison Avenue Larchmont, NY 10538 USA. 2006;15:1028–34 Available from: http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/jwh.2006.15.1028. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  25. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Eisman JA, et al. Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos. Int. [Internet]. Springer-Verlag. 2005;16:155–62. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-004-1640-3. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.

  26. Hannan MT, Felson DT, Dawson-Hughes B, Tucker KL, Cupples LA, Wilson PWF, et al. Risk factors for longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis study. J. Bone Miner. Res. [Internet]. John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). 2010;15:710–20. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.710. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.

  27. Manuel DG, Schultz SE, Kopec JA. Measuring the health burden of chronic disease and injury using health adjusted life expectancy and the health utilities index. J. Epidemiol. Community Health [Internet]. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2002;56:843–50. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12388577. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.

  28. Levesque J-F, Mukherjee S, Grimard D, Boivin A, Mishra S. Measuring the prevalence of chronic diseases using population surveys by pooling self-reported symptoms, diagnosis and treatments: results from the World Health Survey of 2003 for South Asia. Int. J. Public Health [Internet]. SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel. 2013;58:435–47. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00038-013-0446-5. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project is supported by Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahman Cheraghian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asadi-Lari, M., Salimi, Y., Vaez-Mahdavi, M.R. et al. Socio-Economic Status and Prevalence of Self-Reported Osteoporosis in Tehran: Results from a Large Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study (Urban HEART-2). J Urban Health 95, 682–690 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0246-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0246-6

Keywords

Navigation