Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Barriers to Knowledge Production, Knowledge Translation, and Urban Health Policy Change: Ideological, Economic, and Political Considerations

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider social forces that affect the processes of both knowledge production and knowledge translation in relation to urban health research. First, we briefly review our conceptual model, derived from a social-conflict framework, to outline how unequal power relations and health inequalities are causally linked. Second, we critically discuss ideological, political, and economic barriers that exist within academia that affect knowledge production related to urban health and health inequalities. Third, we broaden the scope of our analysis to examine how the ideological, political, and economic environment beyond the academy creates barriers to health equity policy making. We conclude with some key questions about the role that knowledge translation can possibly play in light of these constraints on research and policy for urban health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the most extreme case, the government may even take strict steps to silence researchers and stop the production of equity-oriented knowledge. Powerful examples of this can be found in authoritarian regimes which subject academics with egalitarian views to various penalties such as labor market discrimination.19 A particularly notorious example is Franco's regime in Spain (1936–1977), where university professors were jailed and tortured for teaching egalitarian perspectives.

References

  1. Braveman P, et al. When do we know enough to recommend action on the social determinants of health? Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(1S1): S58–S66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. About Knowledge Translation. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html. Accessed December 20, 2011.

  3. Dickinson HD. A sociological perspective on the transfer and utilization of social scientific knowledge for policy-making. In: Lemieux-Charles L, Champagne F, eds. Using knowledge and evidence in health care: multidisciplinary perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004: 41–69.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Navarro V, Muntaner C. Political and economic determinants of population health and well-being: controversies and developments. Amiytyville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Muntaner C. Commentary: social capital, social class, and the slow progress of psychosocial epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2004; 33(4): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadri A. Max Weber's sociology of intellectuals. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weber M. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons; 1958. (orig. 1904-5).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demerath NJ III. Who now debates functionalism? From system, change, and conflict to ‘culture, choice, and praxis’. Sociol Forum. 1996; 11(2): 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Navarro V. Politics and health: a neglected area of research. Eur J Pub Health. 2008; 18(4): 354–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. CSDH. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilkinson RG, Pickett K. The spirit level: why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muntaner C, et al. Against unjust global distribution of power and money: the report on the WHO commission on the social determinants of health: global inequality and the future of public health policy. J Public Health Policy. 2009; 30: 163–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Navarro V. The importance of politics in policy. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2011; 35: 313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coburn D. Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: class, neo-liberalism, and health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 58: 41–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Muntaner C, Chung H. Teaching social inequalities in health: barriers and opportunities. In: Hofrichter R, Bhatia R, eds. Tackling health inequities through public health practice: theory to action. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010: 517–525.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Foundation Fact Sheet, Funding from 1994 to Present. Accessed on December 20, 2011 (http://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/Pages/foundation-fact-sheet.aspx).

  17. Birn AE. Gates's grandest challenge: transcending technology as public health ideology. The Lancet. 2005; 366(9484): 514–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gates, B. (July 31, 2008) How to fix capitalism. TIME. July 31, 2008; 26-33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krieger N. Proximal, distal, and the politics of causation: what's level got to do with it? Am J Publ Health. 2008; 98(2): 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muntaner C, Gomez MB. Anti-egalitarian, legitimizing myths, racism, and ‘neo-McCarthyism’ in social epidemiology and public health: a review of Sally Satel's PC, MD. Int J Health Serv. 2002; 32(1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kovel J. Hunting in the promised land: anticommunism and the making of America. London: Cassell; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cote M, et al. Utopian pedagogy: radical experiments against neoliberal globalization. Toronto: University of Toronto Publishing; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lomas J. Using ‘linkage and exchange’ to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff. 2000; 19(3): 236–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Coser LA. Men of ideas. New York: The Free Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Navarro V, Muntaner C, Borrell C, et al. Politics and health outcomes. The Lancet. 2006; 368: 1033–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gilson L, Doherty J, Loewenson R, Francis V. Challenging inequity through health systems: final report of the health systems knowledge network of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  27. OECD. Reviews of Labour Market and Social Policies: Chile. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2009

  28. Gonzalez R. Tackling health inequities in Chile: maternal, newborn, infant, and child mortality between 1990 and 2004. Am J Publ Health. 2009; 99(7): 1220–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Puska P, Stahl T. Health in all policies-the Finnish initiative: background, principles, and current issues. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31(31): 315–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. WHO, Government of South Australia. Adelaide statement on health in all policies. Adelaide: WHO; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ollila E. Health in all policies: from rhetoric to action. Scand J Publ Health. 2010. doi:10.1177/1403494810379895. Published online 2 September 2010.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments provided by the Journal of Urban Health's reviewers.

This work has been funded in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under grant no. 101693, entitled, “Power, Politics, and the Use of Health Equity Research” and by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea under grant no. R1010861, entitled, “Social Risks.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haejoo Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muntaner, C., Chung, H., Murphy, K. et al. Barriers to Knowledge Production, Knowledge Translation, and Urban Health Policy Change: Ideological, Economic, and Political Considerations. J Urban Health 89, 915–924 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9699-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9699-1

Keywords

Navigation