Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Addressing the Social and Environmental Determinants of Urban Health Equity: Evidence for Action and a Research Agenda

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban living is the new reality for the majority of the world’s population. Urban change is taking place in a context of other global challenges—economic globalization, climate change, financial crises, energy and food insecurity, old and emerging armed conflicts, as well as the changing patterns of communicable and noncommunicable diseases. These health and social problems, in countries with different levels of infrastructure and health system preparedness, pose significant development challenges in the 21st century. In all countries, rich and poor, the move to urban living has been both good and bad for population health, and has contributed to the unequal distribution of health both within countries (the urban–rural divide) and within cities (the rich–poor divide). In this series of papers, we demonstrate that urban planning and design and urban social conditions can be good or bad for human health and health equity depending on how they are set up. We argue that climate change mitigation and adaptation need to go hand-in-hand with efforts to achieve health equity through action in the social determinants. And we highlight how different forms of governance can shape agendas, policies, and programs in ways that are inclusive and health-promoting or perpetuate social exclusion, inequitable distribution of resources, and the inequities in health associated with that. While today we can describe many of the features of a healthy and sustainable city, and the governance and planning processes needed to achieve these ends, there is still much to learn, especially with respect to tailoring these concepts and applying them in the cities of lower- and middle-income countries. By outlining an integrated research agenda, we aim to assist researchers, policy makers, service providers, and funding bodies/donors to better support, coordinate, and undertake research that is organized around a conceptual framework that positions health, equity, and sustainability as central policy goals for urban management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 4.

Notes

  1. A Gini coefficient of 0 indicates perfect equality, whereas a Gini coefficient of 1 indicates perfect inequality. Generally, a Gini coefficient of between 0.2 and 0.39 indicates a relatively equitable distribution of resource. A Gini coefficient of 0.4 denotes moderately unequal distributions of income or consumption; it is the threshold at which cities and countries should address inequality as a matter of urgency—referred to in the graphs as the International Alert Line. Cities and countries with a Gini coefficient of 0.6 or higher suffer from extremely high levels of inequality which puts them at risk of instability.

References

  1. Smit W, Hancock T, Kumaresen J, Santos-Burgoa C, Sánchez-Kobashi Meneses R, Friel S. Towards a research and action agenda on urban planning/ design and health equity in cities in low and middle-income countries. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9605-2.

  2. Salgado de Snyder VN, Friel S, Fotso JC, Khadr Z, Meresman S, Monge P, Patil-Deshmukh A. Social conditions and urban health inequities: Realities, challenges and opportunities to transform the urban landscape through research and action. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9609-y.

  3. Friel S, Akerman M, Hancock T, Kumaresan J, Marmot M, Melin T, Vlahov D; GRNUHE members. Addressing the social and environmental determinants of urban health equity: evidence for action and a research agenda. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9606-1.

  4. Friel S, Hancock T, Kjellstrom T, McGranahan G, Monge P, Roy J. Urban Health Inequities and the Added Pressure of Climate Change: An Action-Oriented Research Agenda. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9607-0.

  5. Barten F, Akerman M, Becker D, Friel S, Hancock T, Mwatsama M, Rice M, Sheuya S, Stern R. Rights, knowledge and governance for improved health equity in urban settings. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9608-z.

  6. World Health Organization. http://1000cities.who.int/. Accessed May 15, 2011.

  7. CELADE. Latin America demographics: Latin American and Caribbean Center for Demography. Population División; 2009.

  8. UN-HABITAT. State of the World Cities. Harmonious Cities 2008/2009. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report. New York, NY: United Nations; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leon D. Cities, urbanization and health. Int J Epidemiol. 2008; 37: 4–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bloom D, Canning D. The health and wealth of nations. Science. 2000; 287(5456): 1207–1209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization. Cities and Public Health Crises: Report of the International Consultation 29–30 October 2008 Lyon, France. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van de Poel E, O’Donnell O, Doorslaer EV. Are urban children really healthier? Evidence from 47 developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65(10): 1986–2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uthman OA. Decomposing socio-economic inequality in childhood malnutrition in Nigeria. Matern Child Nutr. 2009; 5: 358–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. UN-HABITAT. State of the Worlds’ Cities 2006/7. The Millennium Development Goals and Urban Sustainability. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. African Population and Health Research Center. Population and Health Dynamics in Nairobi’s Informal Settlements. Nairobi, Kenya: African Population and Health Research Center; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell T, Campbell A. Emerging disease burdens and the poor in cities of the developing world. J Urban Health. 2007; 84(1): i54–i64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ezzati M, Hoorn SV, Lawes C, et al. Rethinking the “Diseases of Affluence” paradigm: global patterns of nutritional risks in relation to economic development. PLoSMed. 2005; 2(5): e148.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mendis S, Banerjee A. Social Inequities in Cardiovascular Health and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes. Background Paper of the Priority Public Health Conditions Knowledge Network of the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. World Health Organization: Geneva, Sweitzerland; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Addo J, Smeeth L, Leon D. Hypertension in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review. Hypertension. 2007; 50(6): 1012–1018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Friel S, Chopra M, Satcher D. Unequal weight: equity oriented policy responses to the global obesity epidemic. BMJ. 2007; 335(7632): 1241–1243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mendez M, Monteiro C, Popkin B. Overweight exceeds underweight among women in most developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 81: 714–721.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nantulya V, Reich M. Equity dimensions of road traffic injuries in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2003; 10(1): 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling A, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008; 372(9650): 1661–1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sen A. Development as Freedom. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marmot M. Status Syndrome. London, UK: Bloomsbury; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Social Exclusion Knowledge Network. Understanding and Tackling Social Exclusion. Final Report of the Social Exclusion Knowledge Network of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stiglitz J. Making Globalization Work. New York, NY: WW Norton and Company; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Globalisation Knowledge Network. Towards Health-Equitable Globalisation: Rights, Regulation and Redistribution. Final Report of the Globalisation Knowledge Network of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Friedmann H. The international political economy of food: a global crisis. Int J Health Serv. 1995; 25(3): 511–538.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baum F. Health, equity, justice and globalisation: some lessons from the people’s health assembly. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001; 55: 613–616.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Labonte R, Schrecker T. Introduction: Globalization’s Challenges to People’s Health. Globalization and Health: Pathways, Evidence and Policy. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Labonte R, Schrecker T, Packer C, Runnels V. Globalization and Health: Pathways, Evidence and Policy. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tannerfeldt G, Ljung P. More Urban Less Poor: An Introduction to Urban Development and Management. London, UK: Sida/Earthscan Publications; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  36. UN-HABITAT. The State of the World’s Cities 2006/7. The Millennium Development Goals and Urban Sustainability. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-HABITAT; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilkinson R, Pickett K. The Spirit Level: Why Wquality is Better for Everyone. London, UK: Penguin; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Friel S, Marmot M, McMichael A, Kjellstrom T, Vågerö D. Global health equity and climate stabilisation—need for a common agenda. Lancet. 2008; 372(9650): 1677–1683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Davies K, Hancock T. The Health Implications of Global Change: a Canadian Perspective. A Paper for the “Rio +5” Forum Prepared for Environment Canada under the Auspices of The Royal Society of Canada’s Canadian Global Change Program. Ottawa, Canada: The Royal Society of Canada; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fleischer N, Diez Roux A, Alazraqui M, Spinelli H. Social patterning of chronic disease risk factors in a Latin American city. J Urban Health. 2008; 85(6): 923–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was made possible through funding provided by the Rockefeller Foundation and undertaken as a contribution to the Global Research Network on Urban Health Equity. The views presented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the decision, policy, or views of our institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Friel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friel, S., Akerman, M., Hancock, T. et al. Addressing the Social and Environmental Determinants of Urban Health Equity: Evidence for Action and a Research Agenda. J Urban Health 88, 860–874 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9606-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9606-1

Keywords

Navigation