Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Community-Based Support among African American Public Housing Residents

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent shifts from federally owned public housing toward tenant-based housing assistance in the form of vouchers raise important questions about the health and wellbeing of rent-assisted households. In particular, little is known about how these shifts in housing policy will affect access to critical sources of community-based social support among those who receive rent assistance. Using the Survey of Income and Program Participation, we estimate the relationship between residence in a federally owned public housing project and the reported presence of social support among a nationally representative sample of blacks who receive rent assistance. We find that in comparison to other rent-assisted households, public housing residents are significantly more likely to report that people in their neighborhood count on each other, watch each other’s children, and have access to help from a family nearby. We also find that these measures of community-situated social support are associated with reduced odds of school expulsion among children and food insecurity among adults. In conclusion, we find evidence suggesting that public housing communities contain social resources that are important to the wellbeing of their residents and are less accessible to other rent-assisted households.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crump J. The end of public housing as we know it: public housing policy, labor regulation and US City. Int J Urban Reg. 2003; 27(1): 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ranney D, Wright P. Race, class and the abuse of state power: the case of public housing in Chicago. SAGE Race Relat Abstr. 2000; 25(2): 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Popkin S, Katz B, Cunningham M. A decade of HOPE VI: research findings and policy challenges. Available at: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411002_HOPEVI.pdf. Accessed Jan 19, 2011.

  4. Currie J, Yelowitz A. Are public housing projects good for kids? J Public Econ. 2000; 75(1): 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Housing Law Project. False HOPE: a critical assessment of the HOPE VI public housing redevelopment program (June 2002). Available at: http://www.novoco.com/low_income_housing/resource_files/research_center/FalseHOPEExecSumm.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2010.

  6. Newman S, Harkness J. Assisted housing and the educational attainment of children. J Hous Econ. 2000; 9: 40–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Newman S, Harkness J. The long-term effects of public housing on self-sufficiency. J Policy Anal Manage. 2002; 21(1): 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Venkatesh S. American project: the rise and fall of a modern ghetto. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett L, Reed A. The new face of urban renewal: the near North Redevelopment Initiative and the Cabrini-Green. In: Reed A, ed. Without justice for all: the new liberalism and our retreat from racial equality. Boulder: Westview; 1999: 176–192.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clampet-Lundquist S. No more ’bois ball: the effect of relocation from public housing on adolescents. J Adolesc Res. 2007; 22(3): 298–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenbaum S, Hathaway W, Rodriguez C, Spalding A, Ward B. Deconcentration and social capital: contradictions of a poverty alleviation policy. J Poverty. 2008; 12(2): 201–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullings L, Wali A. Stress and resilience: the social context of reproduction in Central Harlem. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manzo L, Kleit R, Couch D. “Moving three times is like having your house on fire once”: the experience of place and impending displacement among public housing residents. Urban Stud. 2008; 45(9): 1855–1878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kleit R, Manzo L. To move or not to move: relationships to place and relocation in HOPE VI. Hous Policy Debate. 2006; 17(2): 271–306.

    Google Scholar 

  15. US Department of Housing and Urban Development. A picture of subsidized households. Available at: http://www.huduser.org/picture2000/. Accessed July 29, 2010.

  16. Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, et al. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(6): 843–857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. House JS, Umberson D, Landis KR. Structures and processes of social support. Annu Rev Sociol. 1988; 14: 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. James S, Schulz A, van Olphen J. Social capital, poverty and community health: an exploration of linkages. In: Saegert S, ed. Social capital and poor communities. New York: Russell Sage; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stack C. All our kin. New York: Basic Books; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Edin K, Lein L. Making ends meet: how single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen S. Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychol. 1988; 7(3): 269–297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Geronimus AT, Thompson JP. To denigrate, ignore or disrupt: racial inequality in health and the impact of a policy induced breakdown of African American communities. Du Bois Rev. 2004; 1(2): 247–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. James SA. Racial and ethnic differences in infant mortality and low-birth weight: a psychosocial critique. Ann Epidemiol. 1993; 3(2): 130–136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Austin Turner M. Moving out of poverty expanding mobility and choice through tenant based housing assistance. Hous Policy Debate. 1998; 9(2): 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beck P. Fighting section 8 discrimination: the fair housing act’s new frontier. Harv CRCL Law Rev. 1996; 31(1): 155–185.

    Google Scholar 

  26. US Census Bureau. Survey of income and program participation. January 2, 2009. http://www.census.gov/sipp/. Accessed February 13, 2009.

  27. Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Children in neighborhood contexts. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003; 12: 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cook JT, Frank DA, Berkowitz C, et al. Food insecurity is associated with adverse health outcomes among human infants and toddlers. J Nutr. 2004; 134(6): 1432–1438.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. UCLA: Academic Technology Services SCG. Available at: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/. Accessed March 8, 2009.

  30. Crowder K, South SJ. Neighborhood distress and school dropout: the variable significance of community context. Soc Sci Res. 2003; 32(4): 659–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Corcoran M, Heflin CM. Barriers to work among recipients of housing assistance. Cityscape. 2003; 6(2): 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Austin Turner M, Popkin S, Kingsley T, Kaye D. Distressed public housing-what it costs to do nothing. Available at: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/41159_Costs_of_Inaction.pdf. Accessed Jan 19, 2011.

  33. Venkatesh S, Celimli I, Miller D, Murphy A, Turner B. Chicago Public Housing Transformation: a research report. Available at: http://www.curp.columbia.edu/publications2/PH_Transformation_Report.pdf. Accessed Jan 19, 2011.

  34. Acevedo-Garcia D, Osypuk T, Werbel R, et al. Does housing mobility improve health? Hous Policy Debate. 2004; 15(1): 49–98.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Keene D, Padilla M, Geronimus AT. Leaving Chicago for Iowa’s “fields of opportunity”: community dispossession, rootlessness and the quest for somewhere to “be ok”. Hum Organ. 2010; 69(3): 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Briggs X. Brown kids in white suburbs: housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Hous Policy Debate. 1998; 9(1): 177–214.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Clampet-Lundquist S. HOPE VI relocation: moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Hous Policy Debate. 2004; 15(2): 415–447.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Oakley D, Ruel E, Reid L. Testimony to the United States House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development, Hearing on “Legislative Proposals to Preserve Public Housing.” Washington, DC April 28 2010. Available at: http://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/oakley_testimony_4_28_10.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2010.

  39. Manjarrez C, Popkin S, Guernsey E. Poor health: adding insult to injury for HOPE VI families. Urban Institute Metropolitan Housing and Community Center Brief. July, 2007. Available at: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311489_HOPEVI_Health.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Danya E. Keene & Arline T. Geronimus

Authors
  1. Danya E. Keene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arline T. Geronimus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danya E. Keene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keene, D.E., Geronimus, A.T. Community-Based Support among African American Public Housing Residents. J Urban Health 88, 41–53 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9511-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9511-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation