Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Living in Low-Cost Housing Settlements in Cape Town, South Africa—The Epidemiological Characteristics Associated with Increased Health Vulnerability

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the epidemiological characteristics of a representative sample of subsidized low-cost housing communities in the City of Cape Town in relation to their living conditions and their health status. Four subsidized low-cost housing communities were selected within the City of Cape Town in this cross-sectional survey. Structured interviews were administered in 336 dwellings on 173 plots. Data was obtained from 1,080 persons with a response rate of 100%. Almost all of the state-subsidized houses had one or more shacks in the backyard, increasing the occupation density and putting the municipal sanitation infrastructure under pressure. In 40% of main houses, one or more cases of diarrhea were reported during the two weeks preceding the survey, in contrast to 23% of shacks (p < 0.0007). Of the total group, 1.7% willingly disclosed that they were HIV positive, while 3.5% reported being tuberculosis (TB) positive. One of them reported having multiple drug-resistant TB. None of the HIV positive or TB positive persons was on any treatment. A reported 6.3% of the families admitted regularly eating only one meal per day, whereas 18.5% reported having only two meals per day. The shack dwellers had significantly higher education and employment status (p < 0.01), since they had to pay rent. Improvements in health intended by the rehousing process did not materialize for the recipients of low-cost housing in this study. The health vulnerability of individuals in these communities had considerable implications for the curative health services. Sanitation failures, infectious disease pressure, and environmental pollution in these communities represent a serious public health risk. The densification caused by backyard shacks, in addition, has municipal service implications and needs to be better managed. Urgent intervention is needed to allow the state-funded housing schemes to deliver the improved health that was envisaged at its inception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-HABITAT). The Challenge of Slums. Global Report on Human Settlements. London: Earthscan Publications Limited; 2003. http://www.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/GRHS.2003.0.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2009.

  2. Erguden S. Low-cost housing: policies and constraints in developing countries. Paper presented at: International Conference on Spatial Information for Sustainable Development; October 2–5, 2001; Nairobi, Kenya. http://www.fig.net/pub/proceedings/nairobi/erguden-CMTS1-1.pdf. Accessed February 7, 2010.

  3. Ndegwa D, Horner D, Easu F. The links between migration, poverty and health: evidence from Khayelitsha and Mitchell’s plain. Soc Indic Res. 2006; 81: 223–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Satterthwaite D. Will most people live in cities? BMJ. 2000; 321: 1143–1145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rauh VA, Landrigan PJ, Claudio L. Housing and health: intersection of poverty and environmental exposures. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008; 1136: 276–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomson H, Pettigrew M, Morrison D. Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies. BMJ. 2001; 323: 187–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: World Medical Association; 2000. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/06p0147/06p-0147-c000001-02-vol1.pdf. Accessed January 24, 2009.

  8. Department of Health. Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials in Human Participants in South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Health, 2000. http://www.doh.gov.za/docs/policy/trials/trials_01.html. Accessed October 3, 2009.

  9. Statistics South Africa. Statistics South Africa Income and Expenditure of households 2005/06—Analysis of results. Report no. 01-00-01. Pretoria, South Africa: Statistics South Africa, 2008. http://www.statssa.gov.za/Publications/Report-01-00-01/Report-01-00-012005.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2009.

  10. McMichael AJ. The urban environment and health in a world of increasing globalization: issues for developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78: 1117–1126.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mechanic D, Tanner J. Vulnerable people, groups and populations: societal view. Health Aff Millwood. 2007; 26: 1220–1230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bomela N. Child nutritional status and household patterns in South Africa. AJFAND. 2007;16:1–18. Available at: http://www.ajfand.net/Issue16/PDFs/Bomela_2140.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomson GW, Wilson NA, O’Dea D, Reid PJ, Howden-Chapman P. Tobacco spending and children in low income households. Tob Control. 2002; 11: 372–375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perry CB, Roberts JAF. Study of the variability and incidence of rheumatic heart disease within the city of Bristol. BMJ. 1937; 2: 154–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker M, McNicholas A, Garrett N, Jones N, Stewart J, Koberstein V, et al. Household crowding a major risk factor for epidemic meningococcal disease in Auckland children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000; 19: 983–990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnes JM. The impact of water pollution from formal and informal urban development’s along the Plankenbrug River on water quality and health risk [PhD thesis]. Western Cape, University of Stellenbosch; 2003.

  17. D’Souza RM. Housing and environmental factors and their effects on the health of children in the slums of Karachi, Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci. 1997; 29: 271–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawachi I, Wamala S. Globalization and health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007: 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Connolly MA, Gayer M, Ryan MJ, Salama P, Spiegel P, Heymann DL. Communicable diseases in complex emergencies: impact and challenges. Lancet. 2004; 364: 1974–1983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Harry Crossley Foundation, the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), the National Research Foundation, and Stellenbosch University for the funding of this project, Sister N. Lethuka for help in administering the survey, and Professor M. Kidd from the Centre for Statistical Consultation at Stellenbosch University for statistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thashlin Govender.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Govender, T., Barnes, J.M. & Pieper, C.H. Living in Low-Cost Housing Settlements in Cape Town, South Africa—The Epidemiological Characteristics Associated with Increased Health Vulnerability. J Urban Health 87, 899–911 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9502-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9502-0

Keywords

Navigation